![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#76 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
Quote:
Even the Soviets did not believe they had the conventional strength alone to just attack Lop Nor. That battle plan was nuke based. While there would also be a second thrust through the Beijing and Nanjing Military Regions, this would be exactly the war that Mao had envisioned for the People's War. In fact, looking at this from Mao's perspective, he couldn't go wrong. The bulk of Soviet action and attention would in the West, not East. No nukes had ensured that the Soviets could not take Fortress Beijing and even if his attack would go wrong and invite a counter-Soviet invasion, it would be exactly the kind of war he would be looking for.
__________________
Chimo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 (permalink) |
|
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
|
"It was to show that ground base AD was not a show stopper."
Ok. But the show stopper could have been VVS/WP fighters. There would have been a lot flying in big numbers, bigger numbers then the VPAF were able to put up and keep up. One needs a lot of missions flown by the smaller transport planes (doubt the heavies would be on that mission) flying all the time to keep a surronded force that is under pressure able to keep in the fight. But no point in arguing this seeing with you on this aspect as I am sure you know much more then me on the subject of NATO plans during WW-3 (not really my area and I never faced down the Soviets ). "However, I had a reply all mapped out until I realized I was barking up the wrong tree. I was still thinking a nuke scenario where the war must be over within 30 days. So, my assumptions would not be valid." Without nukes this topic is wierd. The lack of SEAD for the USSR was partly on the assumption nuclear strikes (EMP) would cripple NATO radars. By 1973 they had been working on a SEAD force but no progress had been made other then getting a missile (Kh-28) but not having a shooter. It was not really until about the 1980s that they had a decent (and very large) SEAD force. Plus of course the CF-104s and Mirage-IVs would have lost a big part of their role. But if it not to much work could I hear your mapped out scenario with the nukes and a 30 day war? Even if you have to send it in a PM, as it would be very interseting to hear. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
Remember, you asked for it.
Quote:
I will have to retype my scenario tomorrow. I need some sleep before work in the morning. Will reply when ready. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 (permalink) | |||
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#80 (permalink) |
|
New Member
|
I don't think we're looking at a war that has any real chance of becoming protracted, especially if China were to invade the Soviets.
I think that this would be a quick and decisive war in the west- one way or another, and whatever happened on the Chinese side of things would be a sideshow to the real fight in the West. If the Soviet Union wins in the West, China is of course ultimately doomed. But if NATO blunts the initial Soviet advance, and launches a counter-offensive, it would get very ugly, very quickly for the Soviets. Without China in the fight, the Soviets have a huge strategic reserve force to counter any NATO counter-offensive with massive force(even if it's deep in WP territory). With China in the fight, that force is one hell of a lot smaller, and it has too be divided into two fronts. We've seen how poorly that works for the Germans, i don't expect it would be any better for the Soviets. Now, after a joint NATO-Chinese victory, what do the Chinese get out of it? LOTS. Huge risk, huge reward. |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 (permalink) | |||
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
Quote:
Quote:
1) The Soviets were going to rely on nukes to take Manchuria. 2) The Chinese had set up several Stalingrad type fortresses. 3) Only the strategic reserves would be annihalated, the main forces would still be viable and still had to be overcome. 4) Without nukes, Soviet manpower and firepower requirements just jumped through the roof - 45 divisions just ain't going to cut it. 5) It is still 100 miles from the Sino-Soviet border to a main force engagement. Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#84 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
What about replacing lost equipment..Planes tanks and the rest...I think it would depend on how much Russia can destroy US factories on the mainland,and how much effect NATO raids would have on Russian wartime production...
__________________
"They want to test our feelings.They want to know whether Muslims are extremists or not. Death to them and their newspapers." Protester |
|
|
|
|
|
#85 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
|
Quote:
-Tink |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
|
Quote:
Everything would basically have come down to training. -Tink |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
|
Quote:
No one has ever fully conquered Russia. -Tink |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Turkey turning cool to NATO | Ray | The Field Mess | 32 | Today 13:17 PM |
| Baku - NATO Membership? | Ironduke | The Western Alliance | 64 | 08-26-2008 03:21 AM |
| The Causes & Consequences of Strategic Failure in Afghanistan & Iraq | lulldapull | The War in Iraq | 35 | 05-20-2008 03:48 AM |
| For global security increase the NATO | Ray | The Western Alliance | 0 | 10-13-2006 13:26 PM |
| Project Afghanistan: Pakistan and NATO | Ray | Operation Enduring Freedom | 2 | 05-21-2006 18:08 PM |