ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > History of International Conflict > Warfare in the Modern Age
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
View Poll Results: Conflict that has made the largest impact on the world we know today.
Roman Conquests leading to the Roman Empire 20 17.70%
The Viking Invasions 1 0.88%
The Crusades 1 0.88%
The Mongol Invasions leading to the Mongol Empire 3 2.65%
The Seven Years War/French Indian War 1 0.88%
World War 1 21 18.58%
The Russian Revolution/Civil War 1 0.88%
World War 2 48 42.48%
The Cold War 17 15.04%
Voters: 113. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-11-2007, 17:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
Canmoore
Senior Contributor
 
Canmoore's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-18-06
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,365
Country:
Conflict that has made the largest impact on the world we know today.

These are all conflicts that have engulfed Empires and countries, pitting Cultures, Religions, and Ideals against each other. These conflicts have, in my opinion, resulted in leaving a footprint that is not limited to one geographical area, Region or people. But a footprint that has spanned the entire globe and altered the collective history of Humans.

Which one do you believe has left the largest imprint in History?

Last edited by Canmoore : 09-11-2007 at 17:24 PM.
Canmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 17:07 PM   #2 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 17,140
Country:
Marriage
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 17:14 PM   #3 (permalink)
Canmoore
Senior Contributor
 
Canmoore's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-18-06
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,365
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Marriage
Dam missed that one ..ok i think im done editing

Last edited by Canmoore : 09-11-2007 at 17:24 PM.
Canmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 17:26 PM   #4 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 17,140
Country:
Yep, the Cold War - describes Marriage all right.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 23:28 PM   #5 (permalink)
ozjohn39
Regular
 
ozjohn39's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-05-07
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 141
Country:
The Roman Conquests, but only because the survival of Democracy in Greece was not on the list.


John
__________________
"Do unto others, as you would have them do unto you".
ozjohn39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 23:52 PM   #6 (permalink)
Canmoore
Senior Contributor
 
Canmoore's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-18-06
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,365
Country:
I say the Seven years War / French Indian War. Because, it was the first true world War. And it set the groundwork for the American Revolution.

Had France fought the British to at least a draw and New France did not fall. Than would the Americans revolt against the British? The British were needed to defend the American colonies from the French. Not to mention had the war never happened, than the extreme taxation of the colonies to fund the war would never happened. It was this "taxation without representation" that was a driving factor behind the Revolution.

The entire New World as we know it would have looked very different depending on if the French won the war, or if the war never took place at all.
Canmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007, 09:29 AM   #7 (permalink)
crooks
Croi an Dtír
Senior Contributor
 
crooks's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-17-06
Location: Blarney, County Cork, Ireland
Posts: 1,342
Country:
The World at this very moment has been most shaped by WW2, I would say - though the other wars all provided something, It's WW2 that's so encompassing, and so rooted in our mind (currently).
__________________
'I firmly believe that Ireland and history shall remember Michael Collins with reverence, pride and passion...and it shall be at my expense'- Eamon De Valera.
crooks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007, 16:20 PM   #8 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,520
Country:
In my opinion, the single most world-changing war is not listed: the Umayyad invasions into western Europe in the 8th Century. Charles The Hammer's defeat of Emir Abdul Rahman at Tours (or Poitiers) in 732 quite literally saved the entire world from Muslim conquest.

And in my opinion, it is simply the most important battle in world history for that reason.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007, 16:33 PM   #9 (permalink)
astralis
Foreign Service
Moderator
Lei Feng Protege
 
Join Date: 08-23-05
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,529
Country:
Quote:
In my opinion, the single most world-changing war is not listed: the Umayyad invasions into western Europe in the 8th Century. Charles The Hammer's defeat of Emir Abdul Rahman at Tours (or Poitiers) in 732 quite literally saved the entire world from Muslim conquest.

And in my opinion, it is simply the most important battle in world history for that reason.
that's not a bad pick. but actually, "world" here means western europe (the byzantine empire had the other end of europe), while china puttered along just fine.

i select WWI. had europe not turned on flamethrowers at two paces, many of the nasty "isms" (communism, fascism, nazism) of the 20th century would not have exploded across the world.

imperialism would probably have lived longer, but most likely the inevitable transfer of power would have been calmer.
__________________
Never let the future disturb you. You will meet it, if you have to, with the same weapons of reason which today arm you against the present.

-Marcus Aurelius, Meditations
astralis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007, 16:54 PM   #10 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Actually realistically the further you go back in history, the more of an impact each event had on future events. So the Roman Empire (the cradle of all western civilization) has far more impact then WWI. No roman empire = no WWI but not vice versa.
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007, 17:17 PM   #11 (permalink)
Shamus
WAB Court Jester
Senior Contributor
 
Shamus's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-12-07
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,379
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
Actually realistically the further you go back in history, the more of an impact each event had on future events. So the Roman Empire (the cradle of all western civilization) has far more impact then WWI. No roman empire = no WWI but not vice versa.
I agree with Feanor on this....did I just say what I thought I did? I do agree that as you go backwards in history the events increase exponentially in importance as far as overall impact.Dropping the pebble in the puddle and watching the waves move outward....in this case the Roman Empire and its' conquests are the pebble.Just my two cents worth .Did I just agree with Feanor?
__________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but
it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
Shamus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007, 17:20 PM   #12 (permalink)
Canmoore
Senior Contributor
 
Canmoore's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-18-06
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,365
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman View Post
In my opinion, the single most world-changing war is not listed: the Umayyad invasions into western Europe in the 8th Century. Charles The Hammer's defeat of Emir Abdul Rahman at Tours (or Poitiers) in 732 quite literally saved the entire world from Muslim conquest.

And in my opinion, it is simply the most important battle in world history for that reason.
That is a good one. Europe and as a result the world would be a very different place had the Franks lost... However I do not think that Europe would have stayed under Muslim rule..eventually the multi-national Muslim armies would weaken due to old rivalries and the Germanic people would retake Europe.
Canmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007, 17:22 PM   #13 (permalink)
Canmoore
Senior Contributor
 
Canmoore's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-18-06
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,365
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
Actually realistically the further you go back in history, the more of an impact each event had on future events. So the Roman Empire (the cradle of all western civilization) has far more impact then WWI. No roman empire = no WWI but not vice versa.
That is true, but the Romans were only the cradle for western civilization. Nearly all of Africa, and Asia for the most part went along to the beat of there own drum.

Last edited by Canmoore : 09-12-2007 at 17:25 PM.
Canmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007, 17:37 PM   #14 (permalink)
wkllaw
Contributor
 
wkllaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-07-07
Location: New York City or Hainan, China
Posts: 591
Country:
For me its the oldest conflict of the bunch that makes the most impact.
__________________
Those who can't change become extinct.
wkllaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007, 17:57 PM   #15 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,520
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by astralis View Post
that's not a bad pick. but actually, "world" here means western europe (the byzantine empire had the other end of europe), while china puttered along just fine.

i select WWI. had europe not turned on flamethrowers at two paces, many of the nasty "isms" (communism, fascism, nazism) of the 20th century would not have exploded across the world.

imperialism would probably have lived longer, but most likely the inevitable transfer of power would have been calmer.

Good pick, and good reasoning.

Dammit; typing that has caused the skin to peel off my fingers...
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should members of the Church of God go to war? Ray World Affairs Board Pub 22 06-19-2008 09:53 AM
Articles and links for the Military Professional Officer of Engineers The Staff College 115 11-20-2006 11:28 AM
Rebirth of ANCIENT CIVILiZATIONS veera8 Current Affairs 0 11-16-2006 01:19 AM
The problem with the Arab world is not Israel or the US. It lies within itself. Leader Current Affairs 3 06-22-2004 14:56 PM
More proof of the Saddam al Qaeda Connection Leader International Defense Topics 3 05-31-2004 21:22 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8