ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > History of International Conflict > Warfare in the Modern Age
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
View Poll Results: Conflict that has made the largest impact on the world we know today.
Roman Conquests leading to the Roman Empire 20 18.52%
The Viking Invasions 1 0.93%
The Crusades 1 0.93%
The Mongol Invasions leading to the Mongol Empire 3 2.78%
The Seven Years War/French Indian War 1 0.93%
World War 1 20 18.52%
The Russian Revolution/Civil War 1 0.93%
World War 2 44 40.74%
The Cold War 17 15.74%
Voters: 108. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-30-2008, 00:39 AM   #76 (permalink)
beansprout
Regular
 
beansprout's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-28-08
Location: Sydney
Posts: 30
Country:
Their all Big impacts =O....im think im going blonde!!!
__________________
He conquers who endures - Persius
beansprout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2008, 01:30 AM   #77 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 2,036
Country:
Conflict that has made the largest impact on the world we know today?

i think the very first one in human history, the war that killed exactly 1\4 population.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin
omon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2008, 01:33 AM   #78 (permalink)
BadKharma
Patron
 
BadKharma's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-18-08
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 231
Country:
I would agree that they were all huge impacts upon the world. I went with the early Romans although the Cold War definitely was a close second.
BadKharma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2008, 12:10 PM   #79 (permalink)
bolo121
Senior Contributor
 
bolo121's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-19-07
Location: india
Posts: 885
Country:
I voted for world war 1. Many reasons but already expressed by other members of this forum. John still said it best..

"The First World War was a tragic and unnecessary conflict. Unnecessary because the train of events that led to its outbreak might have been broken at any point during the five weeks of crisis that preceded the first clash of arms, had prudence or common goodwill found a voice; tragic because the consequences of the first clash ended the lives of ten million human beings, tortured the emotional lives of millions more, destroyed the benevolent and optimistic culture of the European continent and left, when the guns at last fell silent four years later, a legacy of political rancour and racial hatred so intense that no explanation of the causes of the Second World War can stand without reference to those roots. The Second World War, five times more destructive of human life and incalculably more costly in material terms, was the direct outcome of the First. On 18 September 1922, Adolf Hitler, the demobilised front fighter, threw down a challenge to defeated Germany that he would realise seventeen years later: "It cannot be that two million Germans should have fallen in vain... No, we do not pardon, we demand - vengeance!"
bolo121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 18:03 PM   #80 (permalink)
Silent Hunter
Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-09-07
Location: London, UK
Posts: 596
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Silent Hunter
World War I. Otherwise, no USSR or Hitler.
Silent Hunter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2008, 21:59 PM   #81 (permalink)
cuba
Regular
 
cuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Posts: 76
I voted for the Romans. Otherwise, no Latin...

Yeah, i might have to think this one over.
__________________
Collins Class rule!
cuba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2008, 21:59 PM   #82 (permalink)
cuba
Regular
 
cuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Posts: 76
I voted for the Romans. Otherwise, no Latin...

Yeah, i might have to think this one over.
cuba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2008, 23:35 PM   #83 (permalink)
Kansas Bear
WAB Resident Historian
Senior Contributor
 
Kansas Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-01-06
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 1,567
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silent Hunter View Post
World War I. Otherwise, no USSR or Hitler.
No Franco-Prussian war, no Franco-German hostility, no Ottoman Empire, no Serbian nationalism, no World War I.
Kansas Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 00:32 AM   #84 (permalink)
T_igger_cs_30
Military Professional
 
T_igger_cs_30's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,943
Country:
I cannot believe no one has mentioned the Canada - Russia summit series of 1972
__________________
<img src=http://C:\Documents and Settings\Wayne Smith\My Documents\002...My Pictures border=0 alt= />FEAR NAUGHT

I don't work here ...I am an analyst!
T_igger_cs_30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 17:49 PM   #85 (permalink)
Foremost
Banished
 
Join Date: 02-23-08
Location: Isle of Wight, England
Posts: 214
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by crooks View Post
The World at this very moment has been most shaped by WW2, I would say - though the other wars all provided something, It's WW2 that's so encompassing, and so rooted in our mind (currently).
You're so right, I grew up as a child in England during the forties, [yes, I'm that old!] it was horrific, during the blitz hundreds of bombs rained down night after night, a house three doors away took a direct hit, luckily they were in their air raid shelter as we were, every night
Foremost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 17:58 PM   #86 (permalink)
Foremost
Banished
 
Join Date: 02-23-08
Location: Isle of Wight, England
Posts: 214
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silent Hunter View Post
World War I. Otherwise, no USSR or Hitler.
How do you make that out? Hitler, [real name Adolf Schickelgruber] was born in Austria in 1886, which escaped any damage by bombing etc.
Foremost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 18:51 PM   #87 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foremost View Post
How do you make that out? Hitler, [real name Adolf Schickelgruber] was born in Austria in 1886, which escaped any damage by bombing etc.
Austria escaped any damage by bombing? How on earth could you come to that conclusion? The film 'The Third Man' made much use of the backdrops provided by the bombed buildings!
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
glyn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 04:54 AM   #88 (permalink)
Foremost
Banished
 
Join Date: 02-23-08
Location: Isle of Wight, England
Posts: 214
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
Austria escaped any damage by bombing? How on earth could you come to that conclusion? The film 'The Third Man' made much use of the backdrops provided by the bombed buildings!
I didn't realise that, I was obviously given the wrong information, but a lot of people think he was born in Germany, did you know that he was once employed as a painter & decorator, later he joined the army eventually reaching the rank of corporal, a few years later he declared himself Fuhrer [leader]
Foremost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 23:47 PM   #89 (permalink)
LetsTalk
Contributor
 
LetsTalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-15-08
Location: Illinois
Posts: 428
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
Actually realistically the further you go back in history, the more of an impact each event had on future events. So the Roman Empire (the cradle of all western civilization) has far more impact then WWI. No roman empire = no WWI but not vice versa.
Without the roman empire, would there be an Italy, France, Spain, Romania...... Latin America?
LetsTalk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2008, 02:12 AM   #90 (permalink)
Arnold123
Regular
 
Arnold123's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-29-07
Location: Shrewsbury UK
Posts: 46
Country:
The World We Know Today

Without a Roman Empire there would not have been a Romania, by definition as the Roman - Dachian conflict sustained the Roman Empire for another 2 - 300 years.
Arnold123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should members of the Church of God go to war? Ray World Affairs Board Pub 22 06-19-2008 09:53 AM
Articles and links for the Military Professional Officer of Engineers The Staff College 115 11-20-2006 11:28 AM
Rebirth of ANCIENT CIVILiZATIONS veera8 Current Affairs 0 11-16-2006 01:19 AM
The problem with the Arab world is not Israel or the US. It lies within itself. Leader Current Affairs 3 06-22-2004 14:56 PM
More proof of the Saddam al Qaeda Connection Leader International Defense Topics 3 05-31-2004 21:22 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:29 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8