ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > History of International Conflict > Warfare in the Modern Age
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
View Poll Results: Conflict that has made the largest impact on the world we know today.
Roman Conquests leading to the Roman Empire 20 18.52%
The Viking Invasions 1 0.93%
The Crusades 1 0.93%
The Mongol Invasions leading to the Mongol Empire 3 2.78%
The Seven Years War/French Indian War 1 0.93%
World War 1 20 18.52%
The Russian Revolution/Civil War 1 0.93%
World War 2 44 40.74%
The Cold War 17 15.74%
Voters: 108. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-10-2007, 18:40 PM   #61 (permalink)
chankya
Contributor
 
chankya's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: San Jose
Posts: 725
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by chankya View Post
Not true.

"Ripples" are a linear system. The world or history is a non-linear system.(at least it looks non-linear to me). Therefore Chaos theory applies.

"sensitive dependence on initial conditions" commonly known as the butterfly effect (from chaos theory) would have two systems with even a tiny change in starting conditions end up with entirely different and independent trajectories.

Am in a rush, will expand on my comments later.
EDIT: I don't really see how I can expand my comments. But If someone takes issue with something particular I'd be happy to explain
__________________
"Of all the manifestations of power, restraint impresses men the most." - Thucydides
chankya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2007, 01:47 AM   #62 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by chankya View Post
EDIT: I don't really see how I can expand my comments. But If someone takes issue with something particular I'd be happy to explain

So you agree that the earliest back conflict would be the most important one?
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 22:35 PM   #63 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,858
I voted for World War I. It was at the start of tremendous advances in manufacturing, inventing, improvement of education, more social awarness and technilogical improvements that eventually landed men on the Moon and provides us with this computerized forum with members from all over the world. It showed the suicidal futility of using 19th century battle tactics against Maxim Machineguns. The improvement of artillery pieces was so advanced (even then) that one gun could fire as much ammunition in one day as a gun could in an entire campaign less than 50 years before.

The 20th century in itself (actually starting around 1892, but who's counting) has had more of an impact on our lives, education and way of living than all of the other centuries in human history combined.

Sure, the Roman conquests were important - in their time and some marks are still left by them. Same with the Viking expansions and coastal demographics. The US Navy 21 foot whaleboat was an almost exact but scaled down copy of a Viking Dragonship. But even those don't exist anymore.

The Civil War brought our split nation back together, but bitterness and hatred was still prevalent up until the 1950's or so. It took 20th century ear slapping to finally get that knocked off (with the exception of a few die hards of the KKK).

Technilogical advancements of the Civil War war showed where mass production of firearms still had some kinks to be worked out. Balloons were first used for high observation platforms and were personally witnessed and inspected by a certain Graf Zeppelin. Mechanical transportation was still by steam powered boats or locomotives (my grandmother's time - and she lived long enough to watch men walk on the Moon while sitting comfortably in our living room watching a Television set that was still Science Fiction when Buster Crabb made his Buck Rogers movies).

Prior to the 20th century, wireless communication was not developed yet. Critical medicines and medical techniques were still wanting. A computer was a PERSON who COMPUTES the daily receipts or adds up ticket sales.

Flying was still for the birds.

In a pre-20th century edition of Scientific American, one of their most esteemed scientists proclaimed that "Besides a few details here and there, we have learned everything that is possible to know." Talk about a foot in the mouth.

Shamefully, students today actually know very little of the 20th century because history classes are really outdated and spend too much time on the Saxon invasions and what date Marie Antoinette got a close shave (getting some of the more imaginative students excited picturing a beautiful woman being decapitated).

I recall once, quite a few years ago, I quoted "Ask not what your Country can do for you, but ask what you can do for your country". "John F. Kennedy in his inaugral address".

Our daughter looked at me (I think she was in Junior College by then) and said, "Dad. You know I've heard that saying before. But we never knew who said it."

"Why?" I asked in utter disbelief.

"Because we never get past the Spanish American War, if we got past the Civil War at all, in history classes when the school year runs out."

Good Lord Almighty. THE most important and most relavant century of ALL humankind and our schools don't teach it.

We are doomed.
__________________
Able to leap tall tales in a single groan.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 02:41 AM   #64 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,911
Country:
[quote=RustyBattleship;425259]
Quote:
I voted for World War I. It was at the start of tremendous advances in manufacturing, inventing, improvement of education, more social awarness and technilogical improvements that eventually landed men on the Moon and provides us with this computerized forum with members from all over the world. It showed the suicidal futility of using 19th century battle tactics against Maxim Machineguns. The improvement of artillery pieces was so advanced (even then) that one gun could fire as much ammunition in one day as a gun could in an entire campaign less than 50 years before.
You make a good case, Rusty. It always seemed to me when I was growing up in the 1950s that WWI wasn't that long ago. However, I think WWII, being closer, had more of an effect on me, and, as far as I can recall, also on everyone else.

But I chose the cold war because it's the last war on the list. The wars on the list run in chronological order and, while the list isn't complete, all of those wars are intertwined--you know, like the end of one is the beginning of the other even though there is a period of peace in between.

Speaking of wars, the thought occurs to me that man never stops warring except to take breaks to rest up. So, rather than peace interrupted by war, it's war intereupted by peace. Cheers.
__________________
To be Truly ignorant, Man requires an Education. (Plato)
JAD_333 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 02:55 AM   #65 (permalink)
Kansas Bear
WAB Resident Historian
Senior Contributor
 
Kansas Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-01-06
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 1,567
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD_333 View Post
Speaking of wars, the thought occurs to me that man never stops warring except to take breaks to rest up. So, rather than peace interrupted by war, it's war intereupted by peace. Cheers.


Sounds very reminiscent of something said on "Babylon 5".....
Kansas Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 09:50 AM   #66 (permalink)
texacali
Regular
 
Join Date: 06-19-07
Location: breckenridge, texas
Posts: 117
Country:
WWII, for the reason that it introduced nuclear weapons. Atomic fallout is a global concern, involving the whole planet and not just the combatants.

Last edited by texacali : 11-11-2007 at 09:54 AM. Reason: Add second sentence.
texacali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 12:27 PM   #67 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kansas Bear View Post
Sounds very reminiscent of something said on "Babylon 5".....
Hmmm. I forget; was that Londo Marlari or G'Kar that said that?
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 15:27 PM   #68 (permalink)
wajahat
Banished
 
Join Date: 10-27-07
Posts: 74
yom-kippur war anyone ???
wajahat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 15:43 PM   #69 (permalink)
Kansas Bear
WAB Resident Historian
Senior Contributor
 
Kansas Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-01-06
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 1,567
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
Hmmm. I forget; was that Londo Marlari or G'Kar that said that?

IIRC it was Michael Garibaldi.
Kansas Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 00:03 AM   #70 (permalink)
Canmoore
Senior Contributor
 
Canmoore's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-18-06
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,345
Country:
RB would you say that the American Revolution was an extension of the Seven Years War/French Indian Wars?
Canmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 02:51 AM   #71 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canmoore View Post
RB would you say that the American Revolution was an extension of the Seven Years War/French Indian Wars?
There is no question that there is a connection between the French Indian War and the Revolutionary War. But one did not lead to the other.

Rather the French Indian War allowed the Colonists a chance to learn warfare and tactics (from Indians who preferred to attack from ambush because they thought marching in rank and file was suicidal - which it was) that were used in the Revolutionary War (at least at the start).

George Washington was in command of "rangers" called the Green Mountain Men (or something like that). So he was already trained as an ambush fighter and was adept at hit and run tactics. But like everybody, he goofed up in one attack and killed a French emissary who was on a peaceful mission.

He applied for a commission in the British Army but was turned down. Some suspect that geneologists discovered he was a distant cousin of King George and might be given more favoritism than he deserved.

Their loss, our gain.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 22:49 PM   #72 (permalink)
Canmoore
Senior Contributor
 
Canmoore's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-18-06
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,345
Country:
Thanks, that was why I omitted the American Revolution from the list. I new that it made a huge impact on the world. But I felt it was a continuation of the French Indian Wars.

I never gave thought to what you just said, but I am glad you gave those points. I always thought of it this way. The elimination of France meant that there was no longer a need for British protection. Also, the heavy taxation of the 13 colonies to cover the costs of the war, or "taxation without representation" was a driving force for the war.

The same can be said about the Russian Revolution and the Cold War I guess. That brings another question, which revolution had the furthest reaching effects? The Russian or American Revolution? I am partial to say that the American Revolution.. I think that I should have omitted the Russian Revolution for the American one.
Canmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2007, 08:02 AM   #73 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,859
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
Hmmm. I forget; was that Londo Marlari or G'Kar that said that?
Hah, I used to be addicted to Babylon 5 too. Thought it was a great show, the conflict, depth of characters, settings, plots, graphics were all stellar.
__________________
The Buck Stops Here
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2007, 20:45 PM   #74 (permalink)
lwarmonger
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 02-08-05
Posts: 1,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
Rather the French Indian War allowed the Colonists a chance to learn warfare and tactics (from Indians who preferred to attack from ambush because they thought marching in rank and file was suicidal - which it was) that were used in the Revolutionary War (at least at the start).
On the contrary, line warfare was the only truly effective way to win.

In North America it was adapted, however, to include clouds of skirmishers in addition to the lines of battle. The British had to relearn that from the Seven Years War (part of their problem was they introduced many commanders just in from Europe when they shipped additional troops from the continent, who were unfamiliar with that type of line warfare).
lwarmonger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2007, 20:47 PM   #75 (permalink)
taygone
Regular
 
taygone's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-20-07
Location: Texas
Posts: 106
Country:
I voted Cold War.

It was the war of US vs Them - Capatalism vs Communism/Socialism. Which lead to Republican vs Democrat where Conservatives accuse Liberals as being Socialists, if you weren't loyal you were called a commie in the 80's. A war without a single shot being fired (officially) spread Democracy world wide and toppled the other Super Power at the time. Many military carreers were built on "what if they push the button?".
I was close to picking WWI and I understand the impact it has had and still maybe doing, but I grew up at the tail end of the Cold War and think its effects haven't been fully felt yet.
I think an honorable mention is the Mongol Invasion. Who hasn't heard of Ghengis Khan? I heard his tactics are still being used today or influenced today's tactics according to History International.
taygone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should members of the Church of God go to war? Ray World Affairs Board Pub 22 06-19-2008 09:53 AM
Articles and links for the Military Professional Officer of Engineers The Staff College 115 11-20-2006 11:28 AM
Rebirth of ANCIENT CIVILiZATIONS veera8 Current Affairs 0 11-16-2006 01:19 AM
The problem with the Arab world is not Israel or the US. It lies within itself. Leader Current Affairs 3 06-22-2004 14:56 PM
More proof of the Saddam al Qaeda Connection Leader International Defense Topics 3 05-31-2004 21:22 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:36 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8