Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: Korea: Reluctant Dragons and Red Conspiracies

  1. #16
    Idiot Mode [ON] OFF Senior Contributor YellowFever's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 Jul 06
    Posts
    5,091
    Quote Originally Posted by Irishman7 View Post
    Xerxes,

    There are two items of your dissertation that I disagee with:

    1.) When the Marines 1st Division and US Army 7th Division landed at Inchon and liberated Seoul, General McArthur should have sent these troops with reinforcements due east towards the sea of Japan to form the anvil with the rest of 8th Army moving north as the hammer to envelope and completely annihilate the retreating North Koreans.

    Instead, McArthur seeing the opportunity for another dramatic amphibious landing had the 1st Marines and 7th Division disembark at Inchon, sail around the Korean peninsula then wait several weeks to land at Wonsan harbor on the North Korean east coast. By then the North Koreans had escaped the trap and in fact the South Koreans coming up the east coast had already liberated Wonsan by the time the Marines 1st Division landed. This was a significant tactical error by General McArthur and his staff and should not be attributed to President Truman.
    While I mostly agree with your analysis I really don't know how significant this was to the ultimate outcome of the war. The Chinese were coming in regardless of what happened to the NorKs by this point. I was one of those "reluctant Dragon" theory believers until the Colonel pasted this excellent article and if true, I really don't know if destroying every NorK soldier would have forstalled a Chinese strike.

    Quote Originally Posted by Irishman7 View Post
    Truman does bear the blame for slashing the military budget beyond what was reasonable after WWII which greatly weakend the U.S. forces immediately prior to the Korean War.
    I think Truman bears a huge amount of blame for slashing the military budget beyond what was reasonable. The last few paragraph from the article enforced by belief that what the korean war was in effect a bucket of ice cold water in his face to wake up to the realities of communism.

    I'm not sure and maybe the Colonel can correct me if I'm wrong but was it true that Truman wanted to dissband the Marine Corp and only changed his mind after seeing what a splendid job they did holding the line at Pusan?

    Quote Originally Posted by Irishman7 View Post
    2.) McArthur's second major error was underestimating the strength of the Chinese troops in North Korea. Captured Chinese prisoners in early skirmishes by the ROK's, 8th Army and the Marines 1st Division shared that there were several Chinese Army groups in the mountains. The General Staff's intelligence in the field was very lacking not to be able to detect a 300,000 man armny immediately in front of their troops.
    I agree.
    From everything I read, Almond was furious with Willoughby because he kept ignoring Almond's warnings.
    Willoughby finally admitted there might be abut "16,000 to 35,000 Red Chinese soldiers in Korea".

    Way too little...way too late, as it turned out.

    Quote Originally Posted by Irishman7 View Post
    Other tactical errors:

    a. U.S. troops were inadequately clothed and supplied for winter warfare. Communications were very bad as WWII era radios did not work well in the mountains and the batteries went dead at crucial times.
    This was one of the greatest blunders of the war, wasn't it?
    Mac was so sure the war would be over by X-Mas that he didn't put precedence on winter gear.

    Readng Col. Hackworth's book about his experience in the winter of 50-51 in Korea sent cold shivers down my spine.

    Quote Originally Posted by Irishman7 View Post
    b. Instead of forming a strong main line of resistance at the waist of North Korea from Pyongang to Hamhung or Wonsan, McArthur split his forces in various columns up single lane mountain roads which allowed them to be easily ambushed by the Chinese.
    True....but at the time they were in pursuit mode. In my humble opinion , this probably wasn't a tactical blunder but rather very bad intelligence guiding Macarthur. Maybe if he had better intelligence he would have selected different tactics.

    Quote Originally Posted by Irishman7 View Post
    c. Overreliance on the ROK's for flank protection.
    I agree.
    In the ROK's over-zealousness to get "revenge" they were not methodical and were not properly prepared for variables (such as a whole pi** pot full of Chinese soldiers coming to kill you) and easily overrunned.

    Quote Originally Posted by Irishman7 View Post
    d. Troops were roadbound. General Ridgeway immediately changed the road bound nature of U.S. troops ordering the taking of mountains and other high points.

    e. Troops were inadequately trained prior to the Korean War. General Ridgeway corrected this as well.
    Ridgeway: Simply one of the best Generals we ever had...deserving far more credit than he is paid in American history.

    P.S. Thanks for the awesome article, Colonel.
    Last edited by YellowFever; 26 Apr 07, at 07:48.

  2. #17
    Banned New Member
    Join Date
    15 Aug 07
    Posts
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Hitesh,

    The decision to move two army groups had have been made before Kim started the war. That is the point here.
    Here are details about the two army groups.

    During the beginning of the Liberation war of china, the two army groups belonged to the Fourth field army of china were special troops in PLA,because they were fully consisted of koreans living in china. After 1949, Kim asked Mao to give the two army group to the north Korea, and Mao met the request of Kim. From then the commander of the two army groups is Kim not Mao.

    So the key point is whether the two army groups should be consider the troops of the North korea or china. I think maybe we have different ideas about this.

    If the two army groups are the troops of the north korea, obviousely you have drawn a wrong conclusion from a wrong premise.

    By the way, after the korea war, officers of the two army groups were cleanout by Kim on order to cut down the influence from china.

  3. #18
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    24,168
    The two Army Groups in question are the 13th and the 3rd. Both Army Groups returned to China after the war. And you're confusing Field Armies to Army Groups. A Field Army belongs to a Army Group, not vice versa.
    Chimo

  4. #19
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,822
    Quote Originally Posted by astralis View Post
    an interesting personal addendum on the topic,

    a while back i forwarded this to my younger cousin, who's now attending GWU's elliott school of int'l affairs for his MA. he duly forwarded the article to shambaugh, whom is one of his professors.

    he then got back this response.

    "No, I haven't read this before--but I tend not to read such things."

    ah, academics... a PLA-watching academic, no less...
    I hate to say this, but Shambaugh is not what I consider a very model of PLA watcher.

  5. #20
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,822
    my take with the first half of the doc.

    While he correctly identified that there is an new found interest about the Korean war, especially among Asian-Americans, but the writer never identified who they are as the third wave of history is just as diverse as next guy, at the same time the ID Max Hasting. Consider how close Kim and Mao operated during WWII, of course Mao was informed about the Kim's intention and put forward a plan.

    Here are some points I like to ask.

    *. Taiwan, while the 3rd field army was planning and fishing boats were conscripted during late 1949 and 1950s, they give everything up for Kim?

    *. The two divisions (actually three divisions) were indeed returned back to DPRK as most of them were refuges that escaped to China from the Japanese and they did not saw major combat during the famed Manchurian campaign. The China born Koreans were intergraded with in the PLA, during their return, they returned as civilians and not armed.

    *. If we review PLA’s equipment during the first two battle of the Korea war, they were armed with captured US weapon such as M1 not Soviet arms, I think there are enough US Korea Vets out there to testify that. On the other hand, DPRK troops were all Soviet equipped. This fact does not fit well with one of the writer’s points.

    *. Timing, he wrote “In early 1950, the Chinese leader ordered more than twelve hundred aircraft from the Soviet Union.” What year is “early 1950"? if China did have a planning period of 10 months, should those fighter arrives in 1949? This does not fit well with "Red Wings over the Yalu", an award winning book on the Korean air war

    *. He wrote, “China had four million soldiers available”, not sure what the definition “available” is. 3nd field army was moving into Tibet, part of the 2nd field army is finishing the last of the KMT in Burma, 1st and half of 2nd field army were planning for Taiwan. That only leaves part the fourth field army for Korea and indeed most of the PVA combat units that saw action in the first two battles were members of the fourth field army.

    *. He wrote, “Mao ordered China's central reserve, the best equipped PLA troops” Wrong, the best equipped and more experienced PLA was the fourth field army from the North, there is no argument about it. However, the fourth field army HQ (AKA PVA HQ) was staffed by 15th Army, 2nd Field Army’s staff officers, who gained Mao’s trust by the successful completion of the Hainan campaign in Southern China. At this point, the writer Rod Paschall has lost much creditiable with me with the screw up of simple facts.


    I don’t know… there might be a conspiracies, I am not argue either for or against, but the first half other article is a disappointment.
    Last edited by xinhui; 21 Nov 08, at 05:21.

  6. #21
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,822
    Col,

    During Huaihai Campaign, aka battle of Huaihai, Deng moved two field armies with 600,000 combat and two million support troops to Xuzhou in a period of 3 months.

    Beijing-Tainijing Campiagn, 900,000 troops.

    Shenyang campaign, 400,000 troops
    Hainan campaign, 250,000 troops

    I am not saying they did not have warming/plannings, but moving three armies down from Shenyang and Tainjing in three months during peacetime is within their reach.
    Last edited by xinhui; 21 Nov 08, at 05:22.

  7. #22
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,822
    IMHO,

    Command, Control, and the PLA's Offensive Campaigns in Korea 1950 - 1951 in Chinese warfighting --The PLA experiesne since 1949 edited by Mark A. Ryan, Davi M Finkelstein and Micael McDevitt, folks from CNA and US army war college is a better read then Paschall paper, because they actually spell out military deployment plans and personalities involved.

    According to those folks, It was Zhou Enlai who called from for a planning for Korea On July 7, 1950, not Mao in a national security meeting of Chinese communist party, Central Military Commission. It was Zhou who created the Northeast Border Defense Army (NBDA) an ad hac (warzone) HQ in charge of the war planning with four infantry armies (38th, 39th, 40th, and 42nd) three artillery divisions (1st, 2nd, and 8th), one AAA regiment, one engineering regt, and three transportation regiment - a total of 250,000 -- were to be put under this new command. end quote page 91



    The directive also indicated that Deng Hua, along with 15th Army political commissar Lai Chuanzhu, Cheif of staff of the 13th Army Xie Fang and director of the Political Department Du ping were to form a front command in Andong (dandong) only a few miles away from Sinuiju and the capital of Pyongan Province in Western North Korea. While the NBDA command would setup its HQ in Shenyang, the directive specified that all the combat units were to gather between andong and Kaiyuang. Finally, the CMC order required all the commanding officers to report to their new posts immediately and the troops to assemble at their designated sites within 25 days. -- end quote page 92.
    Last edited by xinhui; 21 Nov 08, at 05:43.

  8. #23
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,822
    speaking of conspiracies, consider this, currently all three of PLA's Mech Infantry Group Armies (38, 39, and 42) were members of the fourth field army and part of the PVA's first wave. 42nd was officially mechanized two weeks ago according to PLAdaily.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •