ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > The War in Iraq
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-25-2005, 21:41 PM   #1 (permalink)
Shek
Military Professional
Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-23-05
Location: Krblachistan
Posts: 7,981
Country:
Iraq insurgents snatch victory from defeat

From the title, I guess the Guardian wants the bad guys to win. Also, the author seems to gloss over the fact that 55 Iraqi citizens called the police to report on the insurgents and their whereabouts. It doesn't sound like a whole of popular support for the insurgents.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iraq insurgents snatch victory from defeat
Massive police station assault alarms locals despite retreat

Rory Carroll in Baghdad
Friday June 24, 2005

Guardian

Dawn had yet to break and Baghdad's biggest police station, like the rest of the city, was quiet. About 80 officers dozed inside the fortress, leaving just a few sentries guarding the walls, razor wire and concrete barriers.
It started with mortars. A series of whooshes from north and south followed seconds later by explosions inside the perimeter. Figures emerged from the gloom and knelt in the middle of Hi al-Elam and Qatar Nada streets, pointing rocket launchers.

More figures materialised on rooftops overlooking the station to spray gunfire and lob grenades. Dozens of gunmen, guerrilla infantry, swarmed from houses and alleys. It was just after 5.30am and the station was surrounded.

The defenders heard engines rev and guessed what was next: suicide car bombers. Baghdad's biggest battle in months - and possibly the boldest yet by insurgents - had begun.

They struck on Monday but details of the assault on Baya'a, a vast police complex in the southern suburbs, emerged only yesterday when American and Iraqi officers opened the station to reporters. Bullet holes and debris testified to a synchronised and audacious strike by up to 100 rebels in what is supposed to be a locked-down capital.

The combination of heavy shelling, diversionary feints, infantry thrusts and suicide vehicles - the "precision-guided" equivalent of tanks - left parts of the district of Hi al-Elam a smoking ruin. If the objective was to overrun the station and free its prisoners the offensive failed. The attackers retreated after two hours, leaving dozens dead and captured. But if the objective was to send a message of power and determination it succeeded.

Residents said their confidence in the government and security forces was severely dented. A rash of graffiti has spread across the area: "We will be back." One taxi driver, a Shia who loathes the mostly Sunni Arab resistance, shrugged. "Yes, they will."

Republicans and Democrats, increasingly worried about Iraq, were due yesterday to quiz Pentagon top brass about a US exit strategy which hinges on building up Iraqi security forces.

On one level the assault at Baya'a was being presented as good news for Washington. "The enemy spent weeks, maybe months planning this," said Lt Col David Funk, a US infantry commander responsible for the area. "They failed spectacularly."

Not since April's attack on Abu Ghraib had there been such a concentration of force in the capital and yet the insurgents were repulsed thanks to the heroism of the beleaguered police officers, he said. But in Baghdad, the fact the insurgents had launched the attack at all was more indicative.

The sentries, pinned down by fire from the rooftops, did not respond when they heard the approaching suicide bombers. One vehicle exploded at the main entrance, killing at least four officers but without breaching the compound.

A nearby Iraqi army base was simultaneously targeted by mortars, gunfire and a suicide bomber, trapping the soldiers inside. Gunmen attacked the police station from four sides and came close to overrunning it. From bases in southern Baghdad US and Iraqi ground troops rushed for Baya'a only to confront insurgents at Derwesh Square and on the Doura highway tasked with slowing the relief force. At least three suicide car bombers had been held back for this purpose.

By 6.30am a police machine-gunner on the roof at Baya'a helped turn the tide, firing volleys which forced attackers to take cover and enabled his comrades to take better positions. Residents of the mixed Shia and Sunni neighbourhood made at least 55 phone calls informing the police of insurgent movements. Some fired on the attackers. An off-duty policeman was caught by insurgents, bundled into the boot of a car and later found beheaded.

The attackers retreated at around 7.30am. At least 10 were killed and 40 captured.

"It was our victory," said the Iraqi commander, Col Khaldoon. But residents, picking their way through rubble that had been homes and shops, disagreed.

Last month the government said Operation Lightning, a sweep of the capital by 40,000 troops, would choke the violence. A spate of explosions in the past two days killed more than 40 people but it was the spectacular but less bloody attack at Baya'a that showed the resistance was still in business.

Videos of the assault will almost certainly surface on the internet, the dramatic images of resistance intended to inspire would-be recruits and demoralise opponents.

Lt Col Funk worried about similarities to the Tet offensive, a 1968 push by North Vietnamese forces which failed militarily but whose scale and surprise gave the impression that the US and its allies were failing. "The media got Tet wrong and they're getting Iraq wrong. We are winning but people won't know that if all they are hearing about is death and violence."
Shek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2005, 21:56 PM   #2 (permalink)
Amled
Senior Contributor
 
Amled's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-04
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,436
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by shek
...Iraq insurgents snatch victory from defeat...

...The attackers retreated at around 7.30am. At least 10 were killed and 40 captured...
I may be in error but I feel that there is a slight discrepency between the banner headline and this line in the text!
__________________
When we blindly adopt a religion, a political system, a literary dogma, we become automatons. We cease to grow. - Anais Nin

Last edited by Amled : 06-25-2005 at 22:00 PM.
Amled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2005, 22:25 PM   #3 (permalink)
Confed999
Staff Emeritus
 
Confed999's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-03
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,681
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Confed999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amled
I may be in error but I feel that there is a slight discrepency between the banner headline and this line in the text!
Yeah, kinda hard to win durring your retreat/surrender/death.
__________________
No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry
Confed999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2005, 00:18 AM   #4 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,765
Country:
That's some pretty skewed reporting. Reminds me of the BBC bastage crouched down beside the Palestinian "militant" while the "siege of Jeningrad" went on a couple of years ago.

I'm surprised the Beebster managed such a theatrical stage whisper into his recorder, what with the Palestinian's crank jammed so far down his Beeby throat.

That was when I cancelled my NPR support.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2005, 01:04 AM   #5 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,520
Country:
Yep, an absolutely stunning piece of idiocy on display here by the Beeb.

We get 'em to fight the way we WANT 'em to fight and then we predictably spank they asses...and somehow this is a demonstration of power by the insurgents.

The Japanese kamikazes must've portended the crushing defeat of the US carrier battle groups in '45 in the very same way, RIGHT, Beebs?

GREAT analysis, Rory. Ya big dork.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2005, 02:31 AM   #6 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,765
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman
Yep, an absolutely stunning piece of idiocy on display here by the Beeb.

We get 'em to fight the way we WANT 'em to fight and then we predictably spank they asses...and somehow this is a demonstration of power by the insurgents.

The Japanese kamikazes must've portended the crushing defeat of the US carrier battle groups in '45 in the very same way, RIGHT, Beebs?

GREAT analysis, Rory. Ya big dork.
Git yer boys to smoke some of these SOBs tonight, B-man. I got my dander up!

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2005, 14:56 PM   #7 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,520
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem
Git yer boys to smoke some of these SOBs tonight, B-man. I got my dander up!

-dale
I'm on all night tonight, and I'll get the word out that the notorious dalem Dander is going through 40,000 feet in full afterburner.

That should just about make certain that we'll see the collapse of the insurgency by sun-up.

Seriously, I'm witcha. I've about had a bellyful of the attacks from in front, as well as the attacks from behind, and they feed on each other. Everytime we have a bad day, the usual suspects start talking about cutting out, or an 'exit strategy', or a withdrawl timetable, and the Bad Guys get a glimmer of hope that just a few more days in the field, a few more car bombs, and it's Saigon '75 all over again.

It seems so blatantly obvious to me that when I see the lefties enagaging in this sort of thing, I can actually believe they want us to LOSE THIS WAR.

It all comes down to willpower. We can't kill every last one of the terrorists, due to the way they hide. They can't defeat us militarily. So, it comes down to who can hang on longest. When anybody on our side (and I use that term reservedly, as I don't think the Left really IS on our side) gives them reason to think they're just around the corner from breaking our will, they are making this harder for us to win.
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2005, 15:10 PM   #8 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,765
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman
It seems so blatantly obvious to me that when I see the lefties enagaging in this sort of thing, I can actually believe they want us to LOSE THIS WAR.
The extreme ones (currently being given voice by the MSM and DNC) really do.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2005, 02:23 AM   #9 (permalink)
Avenger
Patron
 
Join Date: 02-05-05
Location: Paradise
Posts: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman
I'm on all night tonight, and I'll get the word out that the notorious dalem Dander is going through 40,000 feet in full afterburner.

That should just about make certain that we'll see the collapse of the insurgency by sun-up.

Seriously, I'm witcha. I've about had a bellyful of the attacks from in front, as well as the attacks from behind, and they feed on each other. Everytime we have a bad day, the usual suspects start talking about cutting out, or an 'exit strategy', or a withdrawl timetable, and the Bad Guys get a glimmer of hope that just a few more days in the field, a few more car bombs, and it's Saigon '75 all over again.

It seems so blatantly obvious to me that when I see the lefties enagaging in this sort of thing, I can actually believe they want us to LOSE THIS WAR.

It all comes down to willpower. We can't kill every last one of the terrorists, due to the way they hide. They can't defeat us militarily. So, it comes down to who can hang on longest. When anybody on our side (and I use that term reservedly, as I don't think the Left really IS on our side) gives them reason to think they're just around the corner from breaking our will, they are making this harder for us to win.
Yeah, except what they don't understand is that we're in this to win. The morons attacked our homeland and killed our innocent citizens, which was their last, fatal mistake. I'm a Democrat, though very much a centrist, and I'm behind our war effort 100%. I say smoke their fudging arses.
Avenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2005, 04:27 AM   #10 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,520
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avenger
Yeah, except what they don't understand is that we're in this to win. The morons attacked our homeland and killed our innocent citizens, which was their last, fatal mistake. I'm a Democrat, though very much a centrist, and I'm behind our war effort 100%. I say smoke their fudging arses.
I appreciate the backing, my man. Hang tough and give us a reasonable amount of time, and we'll bring home the pelt for you, I promise. But the quitters...we've only been at this for two years, and even with all the progress that's been made, all they can see is the cost, never the benefit.

We'll win, if we're not sold out by the weak-kneed gutless wonders before we can lock it up.
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 14:25 PM   #11 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,520
Country:
I must really be lucky. I've been backed up by a well-written editorial the day after I posted on some subject or another three times in the last week.

Here's another one:

Quote:
THE WESTERN FRONT

The Defeatist Caucus
Some on Capitol Hill seem to yearn for a repeat of Vietnam.

BY BRENDAN MINITER
Tuesday, June 28, 2005 12:01 a.m.

At a press conference with the new Iraqi prime minister last week, a reporter noted slipping public opinion of the war and asked President Bush if his administration is now stuck in the mud. Mr. Bush responded with a joke, saying the reporter might even call it a "quagmire." The reference is to Vietnam, of course, and some in the press corps these days hardly seem able to hide their glee that Mr. Bush's war appears to be faltering. Tonight the president will strike back with a live, prime-time speech aimed at rallying public support.
We can hope that he will mention Vietnam because that metaphor is getting hard to escape. Not because the U.S. is embroiled in a far off, unwinnable war that is somehow compromising the nation's moral character--although convincing us of that is clearly the goal of the critics who never tire of using Abu Ghraib, Gitmo and the Patriot Act to claim the administration is tossing civil rights to the wind. Those were the conclusions drawn by the antiwar left in the late 1960s and early '70s and ended up being apt as the pressure caused the U.S. to retreat and betray our allies in Vietnam. This was the case even as on the ground, particularly after the Tet offensive in 1968, the communist forces were decimated by the American military. Rather the Vietnam metaphor is apt today because the U.S. is in a war it can win and is winning, if only those inside the Beltway would stop preferring defeat to victory and disgrace to honor.





As in Vietnam, the stakes in Iraq today are much larger than simply allowing millions of people in one country to descend into chaos and oppression. We fought it out for a decade in the jungles of Southeast Asia, losing more than 50,000 American lives, because we knew that handing communist insurgents one country made it more likely that they would soon grow hungry for another. Do we think it is now any different with Islamic insurgents just because there is no longer a Soviet Union out there ready to back them? If the U.S. walks away from this war and leaves it to Europe to hold back Islamic extremists, we might as well just accept right now that the terrorists will topple more of our skyscrapers--or worse.
In the end, South Vietnam was abandoned and conquered, and it descended into poverty and oppression. Some, not content to their fate in the re-education camps, took to the high seas, and many ended up in the U.S. But the oppression hasn't ended for those left behind. Dissidents, Buddhist monks and others are routinely pulled off the streets and out of their homes and tossed into prison. Some of the continuing human rights abuses were chronicled last week in congressional hearings.

If this was it, then maybe we could accept a defeat once in a while. But walking away from the overarching moral struggle proved disastrous across the world. After Congress shut off funding to the Republic of Vietnam, U.S. influence receded in the face of communist insurgency, and South Vietnam quickly fell in 1975. The emboldened Soviets were then free to press their interests in Africa, South America and, yes, the Middle East. The shah of Iran fell just a few years after Saigon. Radical Islamic terrorism got a big push from the Soviets.

This history is worth running through because some of those who led the effort to shut off funds to South Vietnam are in Congress today and are among the critics of the war in Iraq. It's not that Massachusetts's Sens. Ted Kennedy and John Kerry learned nothing from the defeat in Vietnam. It seems that they learned all the wrong lessons and still have no problem with watching the U.S. lose an eminently winnable and moral war.





The history of the Vietnam War could repeat itself in Iraq if the Beltway class decides to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Yet we are winning the global war on terror by the only measure of success that matters: Terrorists have not successfully pulled off another attack on American soil since Sept. 11, 2001. We are also succeeding in Iraq and at pressuring much of the Middle East to move toward accepting the antidote to the hate-filled ideology that spawns terrorists: democracy and freedom.
Partly our success can be seen by what's not happening in Iraq today. There are no more mass graves being filled. Nor is there a cruel dictator sitting atop one of the world's largest armies and wondering how best to acquire the weapons of mass destruction that might throw back Western forces. We also don't have to worry about Saddam Hussein handing off such weapons to terrorists from his prison cell. With Saddam out of power, an elected provisional government is now working on the nation's constitution. There will be more elections in the near future, including a referendum on the constitution.

On the military side of the war, U.S. forces have lost fewer than 2,000 people in more than two years of fighting in Iraq--an outcome that would have been dismissed as utopian before the invasion. Meanwhile our forces are armoring up and developing tactics and weapons to defeat insurgents. Even as the enemy is still pulling off deadly attacks, insurgents are finding Iraqi recruits harder to come by. Many of the "insurgents" aren't Iraqi at all but are terrorists from foreign countries. This is a welcome development--jihadis who head for Baghdad aren't heading to Brooklyn. It can also only go on for so long, especially now as the Iraqi Security Forces are growing in number and in their ability to lead counterinsurgency operations. It's telling that recruits to the ISF and tips on what the insurgents are up to are on the rise--both of which are used by the U.S. military to measure Iraqi resolve.

It took eight years of determined effort for Ronald Reagan to reverse the course of history by backing freedom fighters across the globe, building up our military capabilities and finding other ways to put the screws to the Soviets. During those years he was also roundly criticized for confronting the ideologues of oppression and, in the process, risking alienating our European allies. But shortly after President Reagan left office the evil empire collapsed in a heap. We had our holiday from history in the 1970s and again, under President Clinton, in the 1990s, with disastrous results each time. Now we've got the wind at our back and a president willing to confront the ideologues of hate by backing those seeking their own freedom around the world. We don't have to lose this war. But we could, if the nation loses confidence in fighting it.
Mr. Miniter is assistant editor of OpinionJournal.com. His column appears Tuesdays.


Copyright © 2005 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
I wish I could tell what the next day's lottery numbers are going to be, too. But it's nice to have my points buttressed by writers so much more eloquent myself.
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 15:38 PM   #12 (permalink)
Shek
Military Professional
Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-23-05
Location: Krblachistan
Posts: 7,981
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman
I must really be lucky. I've been backed up by a well-written editorial the day after I posted on some subject or another three times in the last week.

Here's another one:



I wish I could tell what the next day's lottery numbers are going to be, too. But it's nice to have my points buttressed by writers so much more eloquent myself.
I learned two interesting factoids today. Quagmire originated in a piece written by a NYT journalist many moons agree describing President Kennedy's Vietnam policy ("Quagmire" as a military metaphor began with the book "The Making of a Quagmire" — New York Times reporter David Halberstam's highly critical account of President Kennedy's early Vietnam policy. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160854,00.html). Kind of a "pot, this is kettle, your black" scenario. Also, of the 535 Congressional members, 265 have visited Vietnam, to include, I believe, 65 Senators. Among the Senate Armed Services Committee, only three have not visited - Sen Byrd (dude's like 95 years old, I'll give him a pass due to health reasons, Sen Dole (she already has plans to visit) and Sen Kennedy (who has no current plans to visit Iraq). So, the most vocal defeatist in the Senate has never stepped foot in Iraq.
Shek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 00:19 AM   #13 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
"Git yer boys to smoke some of these SOBs tonight, B-man. I got my dander up!"

I had some of the Hog crew at my site 'get some' for me during the initial Iraqi invasion.

Check out the writing on the tips of these 2.75" rockets mounted on an A-10.

"S N I P E R"

The rockets in question were fired at Iraqi ground troops a couple hours after this pic was taken. The pilot reported back to my bud on the scene, "Tell snipe he got some".
Attached Images
File Type: jpg A10 snipeRT.jpg (343.9 KB, 72 views)

Last edited by Anon : 06-29-2005 at 00:24 AM.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2005, 14:06 PM   #14 (permalink)
Confed999
Staff Emeritus
 
Confed999's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-03
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,681
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Confed999
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
"Tell snipe he got some".
Too cool...
Confed999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chaos Overran Iraq Plan in ’06, Bush Team Says Ray The War in Iraq 4 01-03-2007 23:17 PM
Rethinking Iraq: The Way Forward astralis The War in Iraq 0 10-30-2006 13:51 PM
Study Cites Seeds Of Terror In Iraq Shek The War in Iraq 0 07-17-2005 07:39 AM
Quagmire or not? Shek The War in Iraq 72 07-04-2005 12:18 PM
Americans Die for Sharia in Iraq lulldapull The War in Iraq 0 03-02-2005 14:40 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:47 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8