ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > The War in Iraq
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-22-2006, 12:57 PM   #76 (permalink)
Confed999
Staff Emeritus
 
Confed999's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-03
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,681
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Confed999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pragnosis View Post
When you talk about people keeping quiet, do you think it might be possible that if a conspiracy is taking place, the government would be able to supress the information by controlling the media?
They can't even keep secret projects secret. They can't suppress pictures of prisoners in dog collars. The government so does not control the media, at least not here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pragnosis View Post
I'd like to ask your opinion. Somebody asked a question on BBC Question Time a few weeks ago. A chap in the audience actually asked the members of the panel "Why did the US/British government put Sadam into power in the first place?", and the the camera quickly moved away and went on to the next question. I thought this was rather strange, like the BBC was hiding something, or maybe the accusation was too ridiculous to answer. I haven't actually researched this. Is this claim well founded?
It was too dumb to answer. The West supported the Baath party to weaken the commies and Iran. To the best of my knowledge there have been no ties found to Saddam's seizure of power.
__________________
No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry
Confed999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2006, 13:03 PM   #77 (permalink)
Confed999
Staff Emeritus
 
Confed999's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-03
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,681
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Confed999
http://www.debunk911myths.org/
Confed999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2007, 03:52 AM   #78 (permalink)
Enzo Ferrari
Patron
 
Join Date: 04-15-05
Posts: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pragnosis View Post
Take a look at these videos:

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...522549547050&q
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...663660134068&q
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...798465373582&q

I know it's only three guys but they have first hand experience of what's going on and actually DO have a conscience.

As for Chinese Domacracy, here is just one of the links stating this prediction:
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...45/ai_18827113
China? Are you refer to the same country called PR of China where they invaded their neighbours like India and Vietnam and making atorics making the Americans doing in today looks like nothing???
Enzo Ferrari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2007, 04:22 AM   #79 (permalink)
Randy Mott
New Member
 
Join Date: 02-01-07
Posts: 1
The numbers do not add up to support this naive hypothesis IMO. Iraq's share of dollar holdings pre-war was less than 0.03% of world dollar holdings.* No threat to the dollar if he had controverted in peanut commodities or anything else. The widely discrdited Robert Fiske made this allegation as a question, asking if this was the source of regime change policy in the US. However, like most things, he asked the question with no information to support it. In fact, regime change became the official policy of the US in 1988 (four years before Saddam talked about switching to Euros). OPEC has never been a major or principal holder of dollar reserves, with ot without Iraq and Iran. The Saudis shifted billions in 2002-2003 and it had no effect. The dollar is still the major reserve currency and its role is not being seriously challenged. Total worldwide foreign reserves holdings reached $3 trillion at the end of 2004, up from $2.4 trillion in 2003, with the largest holders being Japan, at $834 billion, and China, at $615 billion. Most foreign exchange reserves are held in the form of dollar-denominated securities; one reason for this is that foreign governments like the highly liquid market for U.S. Treasury securities. As of December 2003, dollar-denominated securities accounted for roughly 70% of total reserves... At the end of 2004, foreign governments held $1.2 trillion of U.S. Treasury securities, almost double the $609 billion held in 2000. " What If Foreign Governments Diversified Their Reserves? (2005-17, 7/29/2005)

Congress listed the reasons for going into Iraq and ironically most of them playerd out as called. We have given the Irqis a chance for a democratically elected government and it is up to them to have the political maturity to compromise as necessary to make it work. This was a side beenfit to the war and looks like it may be turning the corner with decisios of oil revenue and local elections.

Randy Mott
Randy Mott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 19:42 PM   #80 (permalink)
Pragnosis
Registered User
 
Join Date: 12-10-06
Posts: 28
Country:
Can I ask if this forum is (in it's majority) made up of military personnel and polititians? I've been doing a lot of thinking and watching a lot of documentaries recently and it does seem that there is definitely an agenda for world conflict.

In previous posts' I have mentioned secret societies such as 'Illuminati', 'Skull & Bones' and 'Freemason' and this made me sound as though I am an ill-informed conspiracy theorist. However, all I want to do is to seek the truth. Maybe one does not really need to know in-depth knowledge of the entire economic and geo-political structure to see the 'big picture' as it were.

I do believe in my heart of hearts that there is an agenda about which we (the majority of the world population) have no clue. Just think of the following:

- This invasion of Iraq and the potential conflict with Iran will give the US a great deal of control over middle eastern oil reserves (this cannot be denied). Even Bill O'Reilly admitted that the conflict is over oil (on the David Letterman man show) and Bill couldn't be anymore right wing.

- American military hardware is a huge export of which generates billions of dollars to enhance the US economy. Wars must be created in order for the US to export their machines and for the evolution of the American military industrial complex.

- Heavy propaganda against Radical Islam, basically demonising the whole of the muslim world in terms of public perception. (I'm a caucasian religious pluralist).

- Heavy propaganda (in UK & US), justifying a future attack on Iran, of whom completely deny the allegations from the US of WMD.

- A New World Order is REAL, maybe not as drastic as some of the famous conspiracy theorists' portray it to be, however, New World Order = Globalisation and centralisation of power through the United Nations. Another world war could indeed make this happen.
Pragnosis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Causes & Consequences of Strategic Failure in Afghanistan & Iraq lulldapull The War in Iraq 35 05-20-2008 03:48 AM
Chinese Navy White Paper rickusn Naval Forces 5 01-06-2007 12:04 PM
Your Thoughts on David Icke? joey2 World Affairs Board Pub 12 12-29-2006 07:55 AM
India's Strategic Environment and the Role of Military Power kams The Field Mess 0 11-13-2006 22:28 PM
Why use force when talk works so well? Leader International Defense Topics 54 12-05-2005 04:29 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:42 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8