![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
|
U.S. can't account for some weapons for Iraqi army
U.S. can't account for some weapons for Iraqi army
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. military does not have a full accounting for hundreds of thousands of weapons purchased to arm some 325,500 Iraqi Security Forces by December 2006, a government report released on Sunday said. Coalition forces were not fully accountable for the 278,000 weapons that had been purchased for the Iraqis as of August, and had apparently not complied with a requirement to register the serial numbers of all the weapons, the report by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction concluded. The report found that about $133 million of Iraqi reconstruction funds had been used to buy some 370,000 small arms ranging from semiautomatic pistols to heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenade launchers. But it said Iraqi security forces lacked spare parts -- and even technical manuals -- to maintain the weapons. Moreover, Iraqi forces had failed to fill open arms maintenance positions, and the accuracy of inventories for three of the 12 types of weapons purchased were "questionable," according to the report. It also said it could not find evidence that coalition forces had complied with a U.S. requirement to register the serial numbers of all small arms, a key concern "given the importance of controlling these sensitive items -- particularly given the security environment in Iraq." The review was conducted at the request of Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John Warner. A key Republican from Virginia, Warner recently said that the United States might have to consider a change of course if the Iraqi government fails to restore order within two or three months. Another report released by the inspector general's office raised questions about U.S. goals for transferring control of Iraqi Army logistics to the Iraq Defense Ministry by January 1, 2008. The report said the U.S. military did not have enough personnel to train Iraqi Army logistics units and had not developed a plan to address the shortfall. It also questions whether the Iraqi government would provide sufficient funds to support the army's logistical operations for the army or its police forces.
__________________
To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Iraq in Books - Review Essay | Shek | The War in Iraq | 9 | 02-29-2008 06:08 AM |
| Debate about China, india and US economies, by Businessweek | oneman28 | Political Discussions | 7 | 11-28-2007 08:43 AM |
| Canadian soldiers taking the brunt in Afghansitan when compared to other NATO nations | Canmoore | Political Discussions | 52 | 02-03-2007 19:10 PM |
| Articles and links for the Military Professional | Officer of Engineers | The Staff College | 115 | 11-20-2006 11:28 AM |
| The Radical Left’s War on Gitmo and America | Leader | Political Discussions | 0 | 06-18-2005 11:34 AM |