The following was posted by Archer in SA section.
Now i have a question is it against the rule of this board to post reports about ills or wrong doings in any country irrespective of its religion etc.
I had made the warning by Archer in the following post BOLD
So Mods tell me is that guy whom Archer is warning qualify for any action by the Mods.
i mean is it right or the rule of the WAB to stop or punish any member cuz he or she is posting against any country,
If yes thn why other including me are not asked to refarin ?
[quote] 1. I am shocked Andrew or Abdul or whatever your real name is. Really. Given your high standards of digging out the latest and best about India, I am saddened that you couldnt find out a 90 year old woman. Or even a 100 year old one. That would have been much better for your purposes. Seriously try harder dude, I am sure there is some obscure mullah somewhere who will encourage you. 80 years old ...well WAB will just have to make do with your attempt this time.
[quote]
__________________
Karmani Vyapurutham Dhanuhu
No, if we couldn't post stories about the bad stuff happening around the world, there wouldn't be much to post. Post what you want, just be prepared for people to contradict the story, which isn't hard to do in most cases as the "news" media isn't all that reliable.Originally Posted by Jana
No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry
jana,dont be a cry baby.....the arument(s) by archer are perfectly valid.
its kinda stupid to post each & every rape & dacoity in one"s neighbourhood on the board.
ALL RIGHT RESERVED, ALL WRONG AVENGED.
......and on the 8th day,God said,"OK,Murphy,now you take over!"
For the most part, If a person disagrees with what is being posted about their country, it is incumbent upon them to refute the post/thread.
On the other hand.....
I'm not sure what you mean by this, but here's my take.
It's kinda stupid to post a "news" article on each and every rape and atrocity that occurs in a neighboring country that you don't like, merely to point out how terrible things are over there.
In addition to stupid, it's also IMHO, pointless, idiotic, ludicrous, imbecilic....oh yeah, and ill-advised:
Posting let's say for example, half a dozen "news" articles about the sordid happenings in another country (rape, child molestation etc) within a single day begins to qualify as flame-baiting.
By the way, that's merely an example. Not a hard and fast rule for people to adhere to.
thts exactly wat i meant.
constructive criticism is always welcome,but it wld be utterly foolish if from trow i started a thread bout every wallet & mobile phone stolen in karachi.....just to somehow prove that the law & order situation isnt very good there.
ALL RIGHT RESERVED, ALL WRONG AVENGED.
......and on the 8th day,God said,"OK,Murphy,now you take over!"
It's kinda OK to post news on major events that have atleast some scope for rectification but what's there to discuss about "news" like a 80yr old woman getting raped. Such crimes are uncommon and such "news" seem to be posted with the explicit aim of flamming...
BTW we could have a separate thread on Crimes in India where such "news" could be dumped...
Seek Save Serve Medic
For the most part, If a person disagrees with what is being posted about their country, it is incumbent upon them to refute the post/thread.
On the other hand.....
I'm not sure what you mean by this, but here's my take.
It's kinda stupid to post a "news" article on each and every rape and atrocity that occurs in a neighboring country that you don't like, merely to point out how terrible things are over there.
In addition to stupid, it's also IMHO, pointless, idiotic, ludicrous, imbecilic....oh yeah, and ill-advised:
Posting let's say for example, half a dozen "news" articles about the sordid happenings in another country (rape, child molestation etc) within a single day begins to qualify as flame-baiting.
By the way, that's merely an example. Not a hard and fast rule for people to adhere to.
its kinda more stupid to post Pak gonna name its new airport Gandhara and thn to post hate.
In addition to stupid, it's also IMHO, pointless, idiotic, ludicrous, imbecilic....oh yeah, and ill-advised:
Posting let's say for example, to post Nimze Istisqa offered by Muslims in Pakistan..
No sane person would agree that there was anything discrimnatory against anyone in offering Istisqa or naming our any airport non muslim name.And last but not the least its kinda the most supid the Mod team take sides and advocate one sided view just beacuse they hate Muslims
and also ignore whtever the other side is posting.
Anyway i was against tht Andrew but now i think its unfair and injustice to hey andrw come forward im with u.
What's stupid about that thread. It wasn't started with the intention of ridiculing pakistan. On the contrary, it showed that pakistan was waking up to the fact that it's history didn't start at 8th Centuryits kinda more stupid to post Pak gonna name its new airport Gandhara and thn to post hate.but is in fact older....
Seek Save Serve Medic
come forward andrew(i mean ahmed)??
no he wont.
he just posts some rediculous stuff & hides for cover.have u ever seen him respond to any of the posts in the threads STARTED BY HIM?
no.y?
cuz he"s a troll thts y.
ALL RIGHT RESERVED, ALL WRONG AVENGED.
......and on the 8th day,God said,"OK,Murphy,now you take over!"
Oh really? Do you have any proof of this? You are just FULL of bizarre accusations today.And last but not the least its kinda the most supid the Mod team take sides and advocate one sided view just beacuse they hate Muslims
and also ignore whtever the other side is posting.
[QUOTE=Jana]The following was posted by Archer in SA section.
Now i have a question is it against the rule of this board to post reports about ills or wrong doings in any country irrespective of its religion etc.
I had made the warning by Archer in the following post BOLD
So Mods tell me is that guy whom Archer is warning qualify for any action by the Mods.
i mean is it right or the rule of the WAB to stop or punish any member cuz he or she is posting against any country,
If yes thn why other including me are not asked to refarin ?
[quote] 1. I am shocked Andrew or Abdul or whatever your real name is. Really. Given your high standards of digging out the latest and best about India, I am saddened that you couldnt find out a 90 year old woman. Or even a 100 year old one. That would have been much better for your purposes. Seriously try harder dude, I am sure there is some obscure mullah somewhere who will encourage you. 80 years old ...well WAB will just have to make do with your attempt this time.
__________________
Karmani Vyapurutham Dhanuhu
A clarification, rather a few actually:
1. I never mentioned the mods anywhere in that post or implied any action on their part.
2.Given that Andrew (or Jana) was interested in only such topics, I am sure there is some stuff going on in a billion plus country which surely dwarfs what Andrew/ Jana had posted before.
3.The above was obviously sarcasm, in that the WAB would be so "happy" to have more muck better than the previous muck etc.
4.Thanks for all the attention Jana.
Karmani Vyapurutham Dhanuhu
My bow is stretched for its task
Well, it's all over and done with now.
Best just to move on and forget about losers that have to create multiple screennames on an Internet message board.
That would bother me, except many of the Indian members have expressed the same view. So I guess we're doing a pretty good job of being fair, simply judging by the complaints.Oh really? Do you have any proof of this? You are just FULL of bizarre accusations today.
No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry
Indeed.That would bother me, except many of the Indian members have expressed the same view. So I guess we're doing a pretty good job of being fair, simply judging by the complaints.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Share this thread with friends: