Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Transforming the Army at War: Designing the Modular Force

  1. #1
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Shek's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Feb 05
    Location
    Krblachistan
    Posts
    11,473

    Transforming the Army at War: Designing the Modular Force

    "So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3

  2. #2
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Shek's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Feb 05
    Location
    Krblachistan
    Posts
    11,473
    COPIED FROM ANOTHER THREAD

    Quote Originally Posted by zraver View Post
    Uhm double face palm for me not knowing that and there not being heavy armor brigades anymore.
    Z,

    I stand corrected on the 2 x maneuver BNs - SBCTs do have 3 x maneuver BNs. However, the I(nfantry)BCTs and H(eavy)BCTs both only have two. In order to grow the # of BDEs and grow assets down at the BDE level (e.g., a RSTA squadron) while not creating a huge equipping bill and without growing slots, something had to give. The simulations used to model the effectiveness of a 2 x maneuver BN structure showed an improvement over the previous structure (3 x maneuver BNs but without all the enablers within the BDE), and so they went with the construct.

    As for no more armored BDEs, they, along with the mechanized infantry BDEs were converted over to the HBCT design. The final heavy formation, 3rd ACR, will begin conversion next year to a SBCT.

    So as to not sidetrack this thread, I created a thread over at the Staff College with a lengthy CMH article about modularization.

    However, even BDEs with 3-4 maneuver battalions still wouldn't be able to fight across enough space to be able to fight at the operational-level.
    Last edited by Shek; 11 Jan 11, at 02:03.
    "So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3

  3. #3
    Senior Contributor 1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    02 Jul 09
    Location
    Romānia
    Posts
    1,550
    Sir , going back to our football fields,
    Does the Striker Bde have some Stingers tucked away somewhere ? Or is it in that area augmented by the Maneuver Enhancement Brigade also ?
    J'ai en marre.

  4. #4
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Defense Professional
    Albany Rifles's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Apr 07
    Location
    Prince George, VA
    Posts
    4,445
    To back up Shek, the BCTs are complete units which are deployable as a whole. Division commanders do not task organize battalions across brigades anymore. The increased and improved targetting and recon provided by a recce squadrona as well as a dedicated MI company owned by the brigade commander allows a for better application of the combat power. Remember also that the 2 combined arms battalions have 2 tank and 2 mech companies each for a total of 8 company teams in a BCT while the 3 battalion brigades had only 9 companies. There was only 1 dedicated recon troop at brigade level...now there are 3 in the squadron. The new BCTs actually can bring more combat power to bear than the old ones.
    Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is to know to not use it in a fruit salad.

  5. #5
    S2
    S2 is online now

    Military Professional
    Military Professional S2's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Sep 06
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,584

    A.R. Reply

    Buck, I might assuming we're discussing a heavy brigade combat team. I'd perfer an ability to task-organize brigades should there be a multi-brigade battle requiring divisional control.
    "This aggression will not stand, man!"
    Jeff Lebowski

  6. #6
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Contrary by Nature.
    zraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Oct 06
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    9,780
    Quote Originally Posted by Albany Rifles View Post
    To back up Shek, the BCTs are complete units which are deployable as a whole. Division commanders do not task organize battalions across brigades anymore. The increased and improved targetting and recon provided by a recce squadrona as well as a dedicated MI company owned by the brigade commander allows a for better application of the combat power. Remember also that the 2 combined arms battalions have 2 tank and 2 mech companies each for a total of 8 company teams in a BCT while the 3 battalion brigades had only 9 companies. There was only 1 dedicated recon troop at brigade level...now there are 3 in the squadron. The new BCTs actually can bring more combat power to bear than the old ones.
    We ran 4 company battalions, scout platoon, mortar platoon. Brigade added more scouts, FA, engineers and some MP's. 2nd Brigade 2nd Armor thus had 12 actual companies plus 2 companies worth of scouts plus mortars, engineers and FA.

  7. #7
    S2
    S2 is online now

    Military Professional
    Military Professional S2's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Sep 06
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,584
    Z,

    When did you serve?
    "This aggression will not stand, man!"
    Jeff Lebowski

  8. #8
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Contrary by Nature.
    zraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Oct 06
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    9,780
    Joined the WAANG in 1990 (19E) transitioned to 19K via OJT at Yakima. I went active in late 91 , and retrained as a 63T last duty station was Ft Hood as part of 2AD's 2nd Brigade (St. Lo). 2AD was not on the books yet, when I was sent from 1ATB(cadre) at Knox to III Corps replacement I was assigned to 2AD provisional and sent TDY to Polk where the 5ID was in the process of PCS'ing to Hood as the new 2AD. We finally got spun up and "officially" reactivated right before I got out. I spent several months at Polk and we finally loaded all the vehicles on the rail cars in July of 92IIRC.
    Last edited by zraver; 11 Jan 11, at 04:52.

  9. #9
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Defense Professional
    Albany Rifles's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Apr 07
    Location
    Prince George, VA
    Posts
    4,445
    Z,

    All heavy battalions went to 3 maneuver companies back in the mid 1990s. The AT company was also dropped from mech battalions (every Bradley had a TOW launcher...not needed). A lot of the CSS in the maneuiver battalions was pulled out and put into the forward support companies of the FSB. Technically, back then, the only permanent part of the brigade was the HHC and the brigade recce troop. Everything else came from DISCOM, DIVARTY and/or separate battalions. The brigade commander could task organize within that brigade anyway he wanted to...and the division could pull and move assets as well. Forces were organized along the lines of habitual relationships (whcih is why I ALWAYS crossed attached tot eh tank battalion as a company commander).

    With modularity the brigade commander owns everything. The 2 maneuver battalions, recon squadron, fires battalion, special troops battalion (MI Company, SIG Company, Engineer Company) and brigade support battalion are an organic part of that brigade. Division headquarters now serve as policy making institutions in peacetime and mans several deployable command posts in wartime. You no longer see a battalion moving from one brigade to another. The Army has moved to a brigade centric force for combat operations. Since around 2006 it has been rare for an Army division in combat to be deployed with all of its own BCTs. You may see that more in Astan than Iraq but several different brigade patches under a division command was the norm.

    This organization for combat is the same for IBCTs as for HBCTs...just that the infantry battalions have an AT company. The rest of the structure is the same...just a difference in weapons and equipment.

    DIVARTYs, Engineer Brigades, MI & Signal battalions and DISCOMs are all gone. They became fires brigades, MEBs, Battlefield Surveillance Brigades and Sustainment Brigades.
    Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is to know to not use it in a fruit salad.

  10. #10
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Contrary by Nature.
    zraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Oct 06
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    9,780
    Ok, thanks for the update. I knew the mech units had dropped the AT company, but not that all battalions went to a 3 company format.

  11. #11
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Defense Professional
    Albany Rifles's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Apr 07
    Location
    Prince George, VA
    Posts
    4,445
    Quote Originally Posted by zraver View Post
    Ok, thanks for the update. I knew the mech units had dropped the AT company, but not that all battalions went to a 3 company format.

    Knowing this force structure and using it on a daily basis is literally my job...coems second nature to me.
    Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is to know to not use it in a fruit salad.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. modular warships
    By BD1 in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04 Feb 07,, 17:19
  2. Attaching Modular Amour on Tanks
    By Novercalis in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 15 Jan 07,, 22:07
  3. US Army Force Structure
    By Wraith601 in forum The Field Mess
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 17 Aug 06,, 04:51
  4. What is the toughest part in designing a plane?
    By gunnut in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 23 Jun 06,, 17:56
  5. Keeping Our Best Army Coalition Relevant by Transforming Together
    By Officer of Engineers in forum The Field Mess
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 17 Sep 03,, 03:30

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •