Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 24 of 24

Thread: What is the role of nuclear arsenals ?

  1. #16
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Contrary by Nature.
    zraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Oct 06
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    9,780
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Z,

    I am not sure what you're getting at. Americans and the Chinese were shooting at each other as did the Chinese and the Soviets when all of them had the nuke.

    The Chinese were there for Vietnam, not in direct confrontation with the Americans. The Soviet Honchos were in Aircraft marked with Chinese (pre-nuclear) or North Korean markings and over communist controlled territory.
    It was never really force on force as both communist forces commitments were small and not of the type to spark a war like say a tank division. They also followed international precedent of volunteer formations. I listed some examples below, they did to lead to declarations of war because all though they were effectively part of the uniformed services they were doing proxy work.

    Spanish Civil War
    Spanish Azure division in Barbarossa
    AVG in China

  2. #17
    Patron Proyas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 May 08
    Location
    Washington, DC area
    Posts
    240
    Nukes deter other countries from using their nukes.

  3. #18
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    14 Mar 08
    Posts
    1,273
    I heard a nuclear strategist argue that if Saddam had nukes in 1991, he wouldn't have invaded Iraq. The theory being is that having nukes makes people somewhat more cautious when it comes to conventional escalation.

    If Saddam had nukes in 2003, he'd probably be sitting around annoying the Iranians instead. Sounds a bit like doing our homework for us.

  4. #19
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    13 Nov 07
    Posts
    1,477
    Nukes guarantee world power status for Russia.

    For us and others, it also guarantees national survival against attack by other world powers (or at least ensure that attacks of that nature will come at a very very heavy cost).

    For Israel, it's insurance against catastrophic defeat of its conventional forces.

    Also, if the US was in danger of losing an entire division or some similar catastrophe in a conventional conflict, would we resort to tactical nukes? I'm guessing yes.

  5. #20
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Contrary by Nature.
    zraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Oct 06
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    9,780
    Quote Originally Posted by citanon View Post
    Nukes guarantee world power status for Russia.

    For us and others, it also guarantees national survival against attack by other world powers (or at least ensure that attacks of that nature will come at a very very heavy cost).

    For Israel, it's insurance against catastrophic defeat of its conventional forces.

    Also, if the US was in danger of losing an entire division or some similar catastrophe in a conventional conflict, would we resort to tactical nukes? I'm guessing yes.
    I hope not, I'd rather lose a division than let the genie out of the bottle- we didn't do it before. But there is always the chance that a president will avoid 10,000 grieving mothers now and put millions of future mothers at risk.

  6. #21
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    13 Nov 07
    Posts
    1,477
    Quote Originally Posted by zraver View Post
    I hope not, I'd rather lose a division than let the genie out of the bottle- we didn't do it before. But there is always the chance that a president will avoid 10,000 grieving mothers now and put millions of future mothers at risk.
    When was the last time we nearly had a division overrun and we had nuclear weapons? The Battle of Chosin Reservoir?

  7. #22
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    13 Nov 07
    Posts
    1,477
    Quote Originally Posted by citanon View Post
    When was the last time we nearly had a division overrun and we had nuclear weapons? The Battle of Chosin Reservoir?
    Or maybe retreat and evacuation of the US 8th Army in Nov and Dec 1950 (same time period). However, wasn't the Air Force logitistically unprepared for delivery of nuclear weapons in Korea at that time?

  8. #23
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,966
    Citanon,

    We did not throw a nuke at Tora Bora.
    Last edited by Officer of Engineers; 01 Feb 09, at 06:48.
    Chimo

  9. #24
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Contrary by Nature.
    zraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Oct 06
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    9,780
    Quote Originally Posted by citanon View Post
    Or maybe retreat and evacuation of the US 8th Army in Nov and Dec 1950 (same time period). However, wasn't the Air Force logitistically unprepared for delivery of nuclear weapons in Korea at that time?
    I am not sure if the USAF was prepared or not, they should have been. But we didn't do. Conventional weapons, hard fighting and some badass Turks saved the day.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. China-Pak N-Deal.Yes Or No?
    By cold blooded in forum International Politics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 29 Aug 07,, 06:55
  2. US-India Nuclear Deal Clears House
    By Bane in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 24 Aug 06,, 20:57

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •