Nukes deter other countries from using their nukes.
The Chinese were there for Vietnam, not in direct confrontation with the Americans. The Soviet Honchos were in Aircraft marked with Chinese (pre-nuclear) or North Korean markings and over communist controlled territory.
It was never really force on force as both communist forces commitments were small and not of the type to spark a war like say a tank division. They also followed international precedent of volunteer formations. I listed some examples below, they did to lead to declarations of war because all though they were effectively part of the uniformed services they were doing proxy work.
Spanish Civil War
Spanish Azure division in Barbarossa
AVG in China
Nukes deter other countries from using their nukes.
I heard a nuclear strategist argue that if Saddam had nukes in 1991, he wouldn't have invaded Iraq. The theory being is that having nukes makes people somewhat more cautious when it comes to conventional escalation.
If Saddam had nukes in 2003, he'd probably be sitting around annoying the Iranians instead. Sounds a bit like doing our homework for us.
Nukes guarantee world power status for Russia.
For us and others, it also guarantees national survival against attack by other world powers (or at least ensure that attacks of that nature will come at a very very heavy cost).
For Israel, it's insurance against catastrophic defeat of its conventional forces.
Also, if the US was in danger of losing an entire division or some similar catastrophe in a conventional conflict, would we resort to tactical nukes? I'm guessing yes.
Citanon,
We did not throw a nuke at Tora Bora.
Last edited by Officer of Engineers; 01 Feb 09, at 06:48.
Chimo
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Share this thread with friends: