ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > South Asian Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old 12-20-2005, 10:25 AM   #31 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 26,149
Country:
Lemontree,

Increasing the manpower is the answer but we (the Army) are governed by what is known as the "Manpower Ceiling".

Attachment is feasible if it does not impinge upon the AD's primary task.

__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA
Ray is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2005, 14:57 PM   #32 (permalink)
Blademaster
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-03
Posts: 3,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemontree
In mountains and deserts ones defences are in all round defence and not just 3 sides.
What success would we have had when the PA was already deployed in their main defensive positions?...
Well, I think we should have launch an offensive across the LOC to cut off the line of supply along the chicken neck thing. Then we can easily starve the enemy holding out on the peaks.

One thing is clear. We need massive bombardment or carpet bombing capability. We can't afford to let Pakistan inflict heavy casaulties on our regiments from an advantaged location with few men.
Blademaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2005, 18:07 PM   #33 (permalink)
Anoop C
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-20-05
Posts: 396
Blade Master,

You might find the book 'A Ridge Too Far' by Capt (R) Amarinder Singh, informative on various aspects of the Kargil conflict, particularly the use of bunker busters in some cases. There are even photographs of damaged sangars.

As far as the choking off of supplies, escape routes and isolating cross-defences is concerned, that's exactly what 8 Sikh did (for nearly 2 months!) before 18 Grenadiers dealt the death blow on Tiger Hill.

Colonel,

Thanks for the feedback on that estimate on BR. However, the 55 hours was purely for sailing, not including mobilization and embarking. I remember reading a post of yours a long time ago that said it was virtually impossible to keep a battalion on 24 hour readiness for any length of time. Can you elaborate what the limitations are? Is it division of labor, lack of sleep, lack of hospitable accomodation?
Anoop C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2005, 18:25 PM   #34 (permalink)
Anoop C
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-20-05
Posts: 396
Ray sahab,

You had mentioned that induction of new weapons in the IA is not optimal due to manpower limitations.

I am assuming that these new weapons are the anti-material rifles and the Carl Gustaves, which are heavy and whose ammo needs to be carried too. I am further assuming that if a rifle-man can engage with a Carl Gustav (C-G) prior to the assault, he can exchange that weapon for a rifle during the assault, because the two actions will not be simultaneous. So the real limitation is that he cannot carry both his rifle & ammo & supplies as well as the C-G into battle.

From the ToE of the infantry battalion available on Orbat.com

http://www.orbat.com/site/toe/toe/india/infbn.html

there are about 59 un-accounted for men in the Admin Coy, which you had once stated also double up as fighting-porters. Even with that number, we are still hard-pressed to maintain bayonet strength upon induction of new weapons?

Please elucidate to the extent possible on an open forum. Thank you.
Anoop C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 00:43 AM   #35 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,917
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anoop C
I remember reading a post of yours a long time ago that said it was virtually impossible to keep a battalion on 24 hour readiness for any length of time. Can you elaborate what the limitations are? Is it division of labor, lack of sleep, lack of hospitable accomodation?
Essentially a detoriation of skill, alertness, and equipment. You can keep a force on stand-by for about maximum 90 days, preferably 30. You're keeping people on edge, getting ready to go into action. That cannot be kept up. Sooner or later, you have to step back, allow the people to rest and retrain them back to their performance edge. If you sit around waiting to go on mission, you don't have time to train, at least not properly.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 00:53 AM   #36 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 26,149
Country:
Anoop,

Apart from the excellent details that have been elucidated by the Colonel, the greatest drawback of keeping troops on the ready is that if it is prolonged, it creates a strain since they are all geared up and the adrenalin flowing full speed!

The tempo then recedes and that zip is not there!

Ray is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 02:00 AM   #37 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,917
Country:
Sir,

Perhaps the best answer to your question about possible InA future transformation is a simple question.

Would YOU feel comfortable in commanding a NATO brigade?

As an aside, I would be honoured in serving under you.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Red Storm Rising - Tom Clancy Amaterasu Warfare in the Modern Age 67 03-27-2008 10:17 AM
How clean is India? Neo Political Discussions 163 05-03-2006 19:09 PM
A forgotten civil war in northeastern India Neo Political Discussions 8 09-03-2005 02:32 AM
Pakistan: The State of Denial Ray South Asian Defense Topics 22 05-07-2005 08:47 AM
Imperialism? tarek Political Discussions 80 02-01-2005 16:59 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:13 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8