ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > South Asian Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08-17-2005, 23:45 PM   #31 (permalink)
Samudra
Senior Contributor
 
Samudra's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-01-04
Location: North London
Posts: 4,429
Country:
It amuses me that educated fellas can ignore the presence of so many high value targets in India.How many oil refinaries ? Nuclear reactors ? High rise buildings in Bombay ? Bombay high ?

So stop being a fool.
Samudra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 00:15 AM   #32 (permalink)
lemontree
Bandaid
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-04-04
Location: India
Posts: 5,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asim Aquil
So India negotiated with terrorists, that would definitely kill a lot more than 76 people in the days to come (probably already have).
We still are talking to terrorists a.k.a Govt. of Pakistan
Quote:
India had also negotiated several times with Veerappan. Sounds like a pattern of weakness and terrorist negotiations.
He was shot dead in the end. While the Pak army pays bribes to NWFP tribals to enusre co-operation. Looks like impotence.
Quote:
So don't give us the bull that you were ready to attack with commandos at Kandahar and not on home soil.
Then why did your taliban friends bring tanks on the tarmac and surround the plane? The ISI seemed to expect a NSG raid.
__________________

Cheers!...on the rocks!!
lemontree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 07:52 AM   #33 (permalink)
raj
Contributor
 
Join Date: 05-13-05
Posts: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by lahori Paa jee
India may be planning to come up with a 9-11 of its own. Dont know whats the motive behind this but it surely is a deep planning.

We may be seeing another self created drama of hijacking from Indians.

Of course they are masters in it. History tells this
boy oh boy, "SUN may rise in WEST" but u guys never change. BTW does ur madrasa education say that JEWS were the cause of 9/11, and it was a British M1 conspiracy that made the london bombings.
get a life

-raj
raj is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 08:13 AM   #34 (permalink)
cottage cheese
Patron
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: India
Posts: 176
Country:
Send a message via Yahoo to cottage cheese
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammer
NEW DELHI: Four years after al-Qaida operatives turned planes into missiles and wounded the US, India has decided to adopt stricter anti-hijacking norms which allow shooting down a “hostile” plane if there is conclusive evidence that it is being used to blow up strategic establishments.

"The 9/11 attacks have changed the way the world looked at terrorism. Those attacks made the world realise that even commercial jets could be used as missiles and we have reviewed our anti-hijack norms to meet any such eventuality in the Indian skies," a senior government official said.

The anti-hijack policy — cleared by the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) last week — rules out negotiations with hijackers on their demands and makes it clear that talks would only be aimed at preventing loss of life or ending the incident.

The new policy comes nearly six years after militants hijacked an Indian Airlines plane from Kathmandu to Kandahar in December 1999. The hijack ended after India freed three militants from jail. One passenger was killed in the incident.

"Any attempt to hijack a plane will be treated as an act of aggression against the country, and no negotiations will be held on the demands of the hijackers. Negotiations, if any, will only be tactical and demands of the hijackers will not be considered if it has an impact on national security," the official said.

Outlining the measures, defence minister Pranab Mukherjee said if any hijacking took place on Indian soil, the aircraft would be immobilised and not allowed to take off.

Under the revised policy, hijackers will be delivered the death penalty.

The new norms promises to end red-tapism to ensure that permissions are granted immediately for armed intervention, a move that would reduce reaction time, sources said.

If an Indian registered plane is hijacked, personnel at all airports shall — without seeking the permission of superior authorities — seek to immobilise the aircraft at that airport itself. In case the plane is air-borne, the new rule states that IAF planes shall escort the hijacked plane within the Indian airspace at all times.

IAF has been given the authority to take necessary steps for scrambling fighter jet to guard and guide the hijacked aircraft and force it to land on an Indian airport. Then, it will be prevented from taking off again by positioning oil tankers in front of the aircraft, a source pointed out.

In case it’s conclusively ascertained that an aircraft has turned rogue — or deviating from its stated flight path — it would be shot down lest it turns into a missile, as it happened on 9/11.


The doubtful nature of the aircraft can be assessed from factors like its deviation from originally allotted flight path, non-compliance by pilots to instructions given by Air Traffic Control, switching off the plane’s transponders, no response to radio telephony and aligning of the flight path to a strategic target like VVIP areas or nuclear installations.

"Unless the pilot communicates, to the full satisfaction of the ATC, that the plane has not been hijacked and a technical failure of the transporder is responsible for communication links failing, the plane would be considered hijacked... Once it is determined that the plane will be used as a missile to target strategic buildings or thickly populated buildings, the aircraft will be termed hostile and IAF will take action to destroy it," the official said.

The new policy lays down procedures to ensure NSG commandos, accompanied by a central negotiating team, are airborne within two hours of hijack, sources said.

TimesofIndia
Highly unlikely our spineless boneheaded politicians are going through with that.

Anyway I'm not flying for the next few years, since it's like saying "hey hijack our planes... we are not afraid" .... and I do not wish to take part in the experiment

Last edited by cottage cheese : 08-18-2005 at 15:08 PM.
cottage cheese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 14:58 PM   #35 (permalink)
Akshay
formerly ab041937
Senior Contributor
 
Akshay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-27-05
Posts: 1,523
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asim Aquil
So India negotiated with terrorists, that would definitely kill a lot more than 76 people in the days to come (probably already have).
India had to negotiate since the cause was to save the lives of its people. Your statement doesn't hold a facevalue as it cannot be predicted for how many more people these SOBs would kill. It takes just 1 bullet to send these scums to hell.

Quote:
India had also negotiated several times with Veerappan. Sounds like a pattern of weakness and terrorist negotiations.
Just as I said Negotiations were to save the lives of innocent civilians. We all know the end result of Verrapan. If this is a pattern of weakness then India would've walked out of Kashmir a long time back. 16 years of hostility & Pakistan couldn't get even an inch of Kashmir away from India.. This isn't a sign of weakness. It's a sign of sheer determination & pledge that 'What is our's will not be relinquished at any cost'. Rather, its a sign of weakness for these so called Mojahedin scums who have lost the guts to fight openly & are now trying to take cover behind civilians and use them as sheild.
Akshay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
This is what exactly happened on 9/11 Leader Political Discussions 20 09-12-2008 20:17 PM
Man Shot by Cheney Has Heart Irregularity troung Political Discussions 6 02-21-2006 08:58 AM
Unravelling the spin on a toy plane Jay Current Affairs 6 12-14-2005 23:59 PM
Gates of Fire Shek The War in Iraq 6 08-26-2005 11:40 AM
Pakistani Terror Camp in Action Ray Political Discussions 14 11-18-2004 05:28 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:10 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8