ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > South Asian Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-23-2005, 10:13 AM   #1 (permalink)
vicky007
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-10-05
Location: Pittsburgh,USA
Posts: 703
Canada seeks Indian Nuclear Expertise.

http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanhe...5172005619.asp

How the Mighty have fallen. Canada is now seeking Indian Expertise and Help!!!!.
This is Sweet Revenge for India.Remember how the Canadians had refused to Help India in completing the Tarapur Atomic Plant Contract citing the 1974 Peaceful explosion conducted by India?

Last edited by vicky007 : 06-23-2005 at 10:17 AM.
vicky007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2005, 16:03 PM   #2 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,339
Country:
IIRC Canada was the first western country to help India in building a nuclear reactor...CANDU models. Plutonium for 1974 tests came from Canadian supplied CANDU reactors.

Canada had to stop cooperation, as India violated the agreements.
__________________
A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !!
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2005, 22:21 PM   #3 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 16,554
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky007
How the Mighty have fallen. Canada is now seeking Indian Expertise and Help!!!!
The Indians are probably the only ones good enough and brave enough to go into a detorating nuclear reactor that has been rusting for over 10 years. I know I ain't that brave.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2005, 22:54 PM   #4 (permalink)
Samudra
Senior Contributor
 
Samudra's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-01-04
Location: North London
Posts: 4,356
Country:
Which one , Sir ?
Samudra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2005, 23:16 PM   #5 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 16,554
Country:
From the article

Quote:
The administration of New Brunswick where the nuclear station is located, has asked the federal government for 400 to 600 million dollars to subsidise the 1.4 billion dollar reconstruction of the plant.

The authorities feel refurbishment of the over two-decade-old power plant could be prohibitively expensive and have not guaranteed good performance on a long-term basis. Instead, they said, non-conventional energy sources could be tried out.

Environmentalists have also been alleging that nuclear power plants are plagued with unresolved safety issues, high security risks, chronic under performance problems and massive cost overruns and toxic waste.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2005, 00:00 AM   #6 (permalink)
Samudra
Senior Contributor
 
Samudra's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-01-04
Location: North London
Posts: 4,356
Country:
My bad !

What is this , outsourcing of ... ?
Samudra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2005, 04:59 AM   #7 (permalink)
Neo
Silent lurker
Senior Contributor
 
Neo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-06-05
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 7,920
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky007
http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanhe...5172005619.asp

How the Mighty have fallen. Canada is now seeking Indian Expertise and Help!!!!.
This is Sweet Revenge for India.Remember how the Canadians had refused to Help India in completing the Tarapur Atomic Plant Contract citing the 1974 Peaceful explosion conducted by India?
Would you please define 'peaceful explosion'?
Neo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2005, 07:01 AM   #8 (permalink)
bull
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-17-05
Posts: 2,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neo
Would you please define 'peaceful explosion'?
An explosion which is not intended to create a weaponised bomb.
__________________
What's the difference between people who pray in church and those who pray in casinos?
The ones in the casinos are serious.
bull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2005, 07:43 AM   #9 (permalink)
Neo
Silent lurker
Senior Contributor
 
Neo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-06-05
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 7,920
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by bull
An explosion which is not intended to create a weaponised bomb.
The know how to detonate such an explosion is never regarded as peaceful, atleast not by the West.
Neo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2005, 07:48 AM   #10 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,339
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neo
The know how to detonate such an explosion is never regarded as peaceful, atleast not by the West.
That defn was just not for the west. But its up to "the west" whether to believe it or not.
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2005, 08:46 AM   #11 (permalink)
vicky007
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-10-05
Location: Pittsburgh,USA
Posts: 703
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neo
The know how to detonate such an explosion is never regarded as peaceful, atleast not by the West.
Well it was a Peaceful Explosion and more of a Technology Demonstrator of Indian Capabilities circa 1974.
It was indeed a Peaceful Explosion as India had no intention to Weaponise as proved from the fact that from 1974 to 1998 till the second set of Explosions India did not build a single nuclear warhead under a self imposed moratorium.This is unprecedented .Sure nobody in the West would believe it, Its like a Kid in a Candy Store not picking anything.No other country except India could have exercised such "Self-Restraint"
vicky007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2005, 08:54 AM   #12 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 16,554
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky007
Well it was a Peaceful Explosion and more of a Technology Demonstrator of Indian Capabilities circa 1974.
It was indeed a Peaceful Explosion as India had no intention to Weaponise as proved from the fact that from 1974 to 1998 till the second set of Explosions India did not build a single nuclear warhead under a self imposed moratorium.This is unprecedented .Sure nobody in the West would believe it, Its like a Kid in a Candy Store not picking anything.No other country except India could have exercised such "Self-Restraint"
You've got to be shiittting me! Where did the 1998 warheads come from? Not only did the materials took years to accumulate but the R&D would have taken decades. If you think that the Indians didn't learn from the 74 test on how to build nuke warheads, you're the one sugarred up on candy.

Let's put some perspective on the Indian help. The plant in question is obsolete and of a very old design. We don't even make spare parts for it anymore, especially after Three Mile Island and Cherynoble. The only ones with the expertise in these designs are the Indians who continues to be champions of these power generation systems. Of course, we're going to ask the Indians.

Last edited by Officer of Engineers : 06-24-2005 at 08:58 AM.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2005, 09:08 AM   #13 (permalink)
bull
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-17-05
Posts: 2,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
You've got to be shiittting me! Where did the 1998 warheads come from? Not only did the materials took years to accumulate but the R&D would have taken decades. If you think that the Indians didn't learn from the 74 test on how to build nuke warheads, you're the one sugarred up on candy.

Let's put some perspective on the Indian help. The plant in question is obsolete and of a very old design. We don't even make spare parts for it anymore, especially after Three Mile Island and Cherynoble. The only ones with the expertise in these designs are the Indians who continues to be champions of these power generation systems. Of course, we're going to ask the Indians.
.98 was a political decision.
India could have done that before.
bull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2005, 10:10 AM   #14 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 16,554
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by bull
.98 was a political decision.
India could have done that before.
That's the point. The 74 test paved the way for a nuke weapons program.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2005, 10:45 AM   #15 (permalink)
Hari_Om
Banished
 
Join Date: 09-30-04
Posts: 1,049
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
You've got to be shiittting me! Where did the 1998 warheads come from? Not only did the materials took years to accumulate but the R&D would have taken decades. If you think that the Indians didn't learn from the 74 test on how to build nuke warheads, you're the one sugarred up on candy.
Colonel,

I am in complete agreement with you when you say that India learnt from the 1974 tests


Quote:
Let's put some perspective on the Indian help. The plant in question is obsolete and of a very old design. We don't even make spare parts for it anymore, especially after Three Mile Island and Cherynoble. The only ones with the expertise in these designs are the Indians who continues to be champions of these power generation systems. Of course, we're going to ask the Indians
We however diverge here.

The Point Lepreau plant, where Indian help is reportedly sought, is a CANDU-6 reactor, the first of that design.

Qinshan Phase III (Units 4 and 5) in the PRC are CANDU-6’s. Qinshan-4 went commercial on December 31, 2002, and Qinshan 5 - on July 24, 2003.

Hardly obsolete given the dates. And then I would think it unlikely that spares would have stopped being manufactured.

Anyway, if Canada has indeed sought India's help, I do hope GOI will say yes.

The bottom line as far as I am concerned is that Canada has been good to India, occasional misunderstandings notwithstanding. I do not agree with Canada having stopped nuclear co-operation with India post 1974, but I will reluctantly admit that Canada had its own sound reasons and acted on its beliefs, none of which were in any sense perverse. That is to be respected.
Hari_Om is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US-India Nuclear Deal Clears House Bane Political Discussions 17 08-24-2006 15:57 PM
Is the US-India Nuclear Deal good for the US & the world? OrdinaryGuy Political Discussions 25 07-28-2006 13:34 PM
Weapons experts warn US lawmakers on Indian nuclear deal Jana Political Discussions 27 06-25-2006 08:03 AM
US wants India, Pak, Israel to be non-nuclear weapon states oneman28 World Affairs Board Pub 29 05-30-2005 12:43 PM
US's $5 billion nuclear gamble with China Ray The Western Alliance 0 03-14-2005 04:53 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8