ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > South Asian Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-08-2008, 21:11 PM   #91 (permalink)
xinhui
Lei Feng Protege
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 05-17-06
Posts: 656
TO quote the greatest military mind of the 21st century


The Unknown
As we know,
There are known knowns.
There are things we know we know.
We also know
There are known unknowns.
That is to say
We know there are some things
We do not know.
But there are also unknown unknowns,
The ones we don’t know
We don’t know.
xinhui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2008, 21:17 PM   #92 (permalink)
xinhui
Lei Feng Protege
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 05-17-06
Posts: 656
As we know

Subs from PLAN have been monitoring every single military ex conducted in that part of Ocean since the 1980s. It happens so regularly , the Japanese no longer report them.

Recall an incident back in 2003, a Ming class sub surfaced near Japan and head home in high speed after at the end of a Japanese ex, it was one of the very few incidents that made it to the news


Note the red algae outside of the sub which suggested it has been stationary underwater for sometime.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Ming1.jpg (147.1 KB, 60 views)
File Type: jpg Ming2.jpg (217.8 KB, 60 views)
File Type: jpg ming3.jpg (43.9 KB, 59 views)
File Type: jpg newboat200311132159200.jpg (128.7 KB, 59 views)

Last edited by xinhui : 03-08-2008 at 21:28 PM.
xinhui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2008, 21:18 PM   #93 (permalink)
xinhui
Lei Feng Protege
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 05-17-06
Posts: 656
But there are also unknown unknowns,


I have no idea why the US commander was so surprise to find a PLAN sub there, which is expected given the recent history.
xinhui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2008, 21:40 PM   #94 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 16,651
Country:
Andy,

My mistake, I've forgotten about that MING.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2008, 21:50 PM   #95 (permalink)
xinhui
Lei Feng Protege
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 05-17-06
Posts: 656
We know there are some things
We do not know.



I don't mean to take over this thread, but the timing of the surface is very interesting. normally, they return home quietly.

It was Nov 2003, only six months after the Ming 361 accident which killed 70. In addition, you can tell from that photo, it was flying a red Chinese flag. There was no flag in the photo with a distance, the one with the cargo ship.


Timing for Japan is also interested, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi cited that incident

and I quote


Japan has also put forward a competing bid to a Chinese proposal to construct oil pipelines in Russia’s East Siberia. China’s plan calls for a pipeline running to the Manchurian city of Daqing, while Japan is insisting on pipelines that run to Nakhodka—the Russian coastal area opposite to Japan. Japanese companies are competing with China over oil exploration rights in other regions too, such as Indonesia.

The submarine incident occurred only three days after the Japanese media published commentary on a study by the Japanese military into possible scenarios in which China attacked Japan.

The Koizumi government is using the discussion of a Chinese threat to justify the re-deployment of jet fighters from Okinawa to the island of Shimoji, closer to Taiwan. Japan is also considering establishing an electromagnetic wave-detecting station on Miyako Island—near where the Chinese submarine was spotted—to intercept the communications of Chinese warships and aircraft.

While both Tokyo and Beijing are now downplaying the significance of the submarine incident, it underscores the sharpness of economic and military rivalries in the region.

Last edited by xinhui : 03-08-2008 at 21:55 PM.
xinhui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2008, 03:43 AM   #96 (permalink)
kuku
Contributor
 
kuku's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-28-08
Location: delhi
Posts: 711
Country:
My my the naval buildup is truly going to be tremendous in the neighbourhood.
kuku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 00:18 AM   #97 (permalink)
Adux
Banished
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: Cochin
Posts: 2,931
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Because at some point, Major, reality sets in. Otherwise, why stop at 15 SSBNs. Hell, I want the Battlestar Galactica.
I think that can be arranged
Adux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 04:19 AM   #98 (permalink)
Deltacamelately
Military Professional
 
Deltacamelately's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-29-07
Posts: 951
Country:
OoE Reply

Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Because at some point, Major, reality sets in. Otherwise, why stop at 15 SSBNs. Hell, I want the Battlestar Galactica.
Fine Sir, but priorities also matters. No one here would disagree that India still lacks a credible 2nd strike capability. And my argument for SSBNs is bang on target...we don't want SSBNs for Pakistan, as I said before...it will be to deter any formidable foe, making it or them think thrice before pre empting a first strike. BattleStar Galactica...Don't mind having either.
__________________
I am the DARK that Rise to Kill..And Soar to Redeem!
Deltacamelately is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 09:50 AM   #99 (permalink)
Sardaukar
Banished
Regular
 
Join Date: 02-29-08
Location: Germany
Posts: 79
Country:
Forget Galactica, just an old tub, was to be put in a museum hadn't the war begun I'd rather have the Battlestar Pegasus....
Sardaukar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 10:15 AM   #100 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 16,651
Country:
I mean the original. Lasers are far cooler than bullets.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 10:49 AM   #101 (permalink)
Blademaster
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-03
Posts: 3,197
Actually lasers as weapons is not practical or theoretically possible because the lasers don't explode things. They just heat things up to a point where the melting point has been reached. If you want to explode things, you have to take the material right by the meltiing point to the vapor point in a very very short period of time. Microwave beams can do that.
Blademaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An insight into the US argument for the nuke deal Asim Aquil Political Discussions 12 07-29-2008 05:15 AM
Pakistan Economy Neo Political Discussions 3653 11-06-2007 10:30 AM
Indian engineers good only at theory: Microsoft lumbakhumba International Politics 84 06-06-2007 12:46 PM
World Bank report on Pakistan water resources: Water economy: running dry Ray Political Discussions 2 01-19-2006 17:35 PM
Pak may build up to 50-110 nuclear bombs by year-end: Study Neo South Asian Defense Topics 204 08-31-2005 11:18 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:17 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8