![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#91 (permalink) |
|
Lei Feng Protege
Defense Professional
|
TO quote the greatest military mind of the 21st century
The Unknown As we know, There are known knowns. There are things we know we know. We also know There are known unknowns. That is to say We know there are some things We do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns, The ones we don’t know We don’t know. |
|
|
|
|
|
#92 (permalink) |
|
Lei Feng Protege
Defense Professional
|
As we know
Subs from PLAN have been monitoring every single military ex conducted in that part of Ocean since the 1980s. It happens so regularly , the Japanese no longer report them. Recall an incident back in 2003, a Ming class sub surfaced near Japan and head home in high speed after at the end of a Japanese ex, it was one of the very few incidents that made it to the news Note the red algae outside of the sub which suggested it has been stationary underwater for sometime. Last edited by xinhui : 03-08-2008 at 21:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#95 (permalink) |
|
Lei Feng Protege
Defense Professional
|
We know there are some things
We do not know. I don't mean to take over this thread, but the timing of the surface is very interesting. normally, they return home quietly. It was Nov 2003, only six months after the Ming 361 accident which killed 70. In addition, you can tell from that photo, it was flying a red Chinese flag. There was no flag in the photo with a distance, the one with the cargo ship. Timing for Japan is also interested, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi cited that incident and I quote Japan has also put forward a competing bid to a Chinese proposal to construct oil pipelines in Russia’s East Siberia. China’s plan calls for a pipeline running to the Manchurian city of Daqing, while Japan is insisting on pipelines that run to Nakhodka—the Russian coastal area opposite to Japan. Japanese companies are competing with China over oil exploration rights in other regions too, such as Indonesia. The submarine incident occurred only three days after the Japanese media published commentary on a study by the Japanese military into possible scenarios in which China attacked Japan. The Koizumi government is using the discussion of a Chinese threat to justify the re-deployment of jet fighters from Okinawa to the island of Shimoji, closer to Taiwan. Japan is also considering establishing an electromagnetic wave-detecting station on Miyako Island—near where the Chinese submarine was spotted—to intercept the communications of Chinese warships and aircraft. While both Tokyo and Beijing are now downplaying the significance of the submarine incident, it underscores the sharpness of economic and military rivalries in the region. Last edited by xinhui : 03-08-2008 at 21:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
OoE Reply
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#101 (permalink) |
|
Banished
Senior Contributor
|
Actually lasers as weapons is not practical or theoretically possible because the lasers don't explode things. They just heat things up to a point where the melting point has been reached. If you want to explode things, you have to take the material right by the meltiing point to the vapor point in a very very short period of time. Microwave beams can do that.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| An insight into the US argument for the nuke deal | Asim Aquil | Political Discussions | 12 | 07-29-2008 05:15 AM |
| Pakistan Economy | Neo | Political Discussions | 3653 | 11-06-2007 10:30 AM |
| Indian engineers good only at theory: Microsoft | lumbakhumba | International Politics | 84 | 06-06-2007 12:46 PM |
| World Bank report on Pakistan water resources: Water economy: running dry | Ray | Political Discussions | 2 | 01-19-2006 17:35 PM |
| Pak may build up to 50-110 nuclear bombs by year-end: Study | Neo | South Asian Defense Topics | 204 | 08-31-2005 11:18 AM |