![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
|
Russia denies selling tanks to Pakistan
Russia denies selling tanks to Pakistan
By Vladimir Radyuhin MOSCOW, JULY 13. Russia has no plans to supply T-90S tanks or any other weapons to Pakistan, as falsely reported at the weekend, a Government arms exporter said. The press service of Rosoboronexport, Russia's state-owned arms export monopoly, denied media reports that a contract for the supply of T-90S Main Battle Tanks to Pakistan had been signed on the sidelines of `UralArmsExpo' fair in Nizhny Tagil in the Urals. ``We unequivocally reject the very idea of any such contracts between Russian defence industries and Pakistani authorities,'' a Rosoboronexport spokesman told The Hindu . ``As a matter of fact, Russia has no military-technical cooperation with Pakistan and Rosoboronexport strictly abides by this clear-cut policy of the Russian leadership.'' Rosoboronexport controls 95 per cent of Russian defence exports, including all supplies of tanks. http://www.hindu.com/2004/07/14/stor...1405471200.htm
__________________
A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
|
http://www.pakistanlink.com/headlines/July04/13/08.html
http://in.rediff.com/news/2004/jul/11tank.htm Russian news agencies reported that Pakistan would receive a large batch of modern T-90S battle tanks. A short time ago, Uralvagonzavod supplied 300 such tanks to India — Pakistan’s main rival in the Hindustan region. http://www.mosnews.com/money/2004/07/12/pakitank.shtml |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
Quote:
They have a tank called Al Khalid. Invented? Maybe not. Producing? Yes. requirement to be proud? I reckon that much must be conceded. Al Khalid may not be as good as T 90 but then at least they are moving forward. As an Indian, I should crib, but then, as a sub continental bloke, I sure woud like the Pakistan industry goes full stream. I believe that if a country developes confidence and faith in itself, then that is the best for security of the region and the world.
__________________
![]() "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination." I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to. HAKUNA MATATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Sorry but Al Khalid is inferior to the modern MBTs including Arjun. It is nothing but an upgraded T-55 chassis with a more modern turret but limited. The T-55 chasis can only do that much and not more. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Banished
Senior Contributor
|
T-90S.... hmmm At first I thought they'd resume Uralzongonza (something like that) MBT project that couldn't find any funding wiht Pakistan... T-90S is not a significant gain. T-90S comes close, but on the Sub-continental Terrain, AK would take it down. Plus India already has T-90S. Makes no sense!
Arjun? It's not scrapped yet? Naah I think that's a failed tank. India should try to pump some $$ into Uralwhatever MBT and get it moving. That project has been dormant for about 10 yrs now. It's wasted enough money on the Arjun. Or it's got some breathing space with the T-90S, and try to wrap up the LCA, critics are fearing an Arjun like fate for it too. India's Mirage 2000-5 purchases should help the LCA. It's a similar aircraft. Btw, Kasuri said something like, our defence deals were not about tanks, but he said I'm not ruling out any defence deals. Pretty weird **** happening out there. Today Sweden agrees to sell us Awacs, before denying defence deals. Defence deals are a pain in the ass. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Banished
Senior Contributor
|
Simple, its a similar capability machine. We can make it cheaper if done ourselves. It's not like buying a Merkava.
Plus the Pakistan Army is quite capable. It's the PAF that has been crippled through sanctions. We can buy 10,000 Merkava's but if not supported by a good AF, it'd be easy pickings for the IAF. Ukraine's pumping in tanks, China's helped modify HIT for Zarrar and AK's serial production. It just makes no sense to go for something like a T-90S. I thought it'd be the Uralthing.... Which even 10yrs later, looks pretty darn nice.... on paper that is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
http://www.123bharath.com/india-news...llnews&id=2367 This Software Engineer, who btw is from India, once told me, that one of the biggest test I could face as a project manager would be the ability to get up and pull the entire Project back to the drawing board at advanced stages. Usually we look very deep, before moving on to the first prototype. It gets very hard once we have a solution's prototype on our hands. Stubborness can kick in and valuable resources start to get wasted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
Though I don't know whether it's superior to Arjun and T-90S, but I'm pretty sure that it could take them on in battle, and possibly win. Another thing one must not forget is that, the Al Khalid is low cost, and the Pakistan Army can and will buy it in fairly large numbers, enough to scare the Indian Army, ofcourse, they were scared after Pakistan bought 320 T-80UD tanks. As for Arjun, whats with only hundred something ordered? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
Indian Army is not worried about hardware acquisition by the Pak Armed Forces.
The 1965 War clerly indicates that even when Pakistan had far superior tanks than the Indian Army i.e. the Patton, it left behind 'tank graves' strewn around. It is the man behind the machine that actually matters. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
Quote:
You want to explain your expertise to a fellow Canadian? A Canadian with the Queen's Commission I might add.
__________________
Chimo |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pakistan may join Nuclear Suppliers’ Group in few years, says study | Neo | South Asian Defense Topics | 5 | 02-06-2007 15:11 PM |
| America's Pathetic Putin-Envy | VovaLee | Political Discussions | 44 | 12-19-2006 17:34 PM |
| 'We must do something about Pakistan' | Hari_Om | Current Affairs | 11 | 09-08-2006 08:40 AM |
| The Strange Case of Mr. Hyde and Dr. Jekyll: General Pervez Musharraf | indianguy4u | South Asian Defense Topics | 0 | 08-29-2005 04:18 AM |
| A World Sindhi Intellectual's View on the Future of Pakistan | Ray | Political Discussions | 5 | 10-17-2004 08:40 AM |