![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
| View Poll Results: best sniper rifle | |||
| M24 |
|
17 | 11.26% |
| PSG1 |
|
34 | 22.52% |
| M21 |
|
8 | 5.30% |
| M82 |
|
20 | 13.25% |
| L96 |
|
14 | 9.27% |
| SDV |
|
22 | 14.57% |
| Other |
|
36 | 23.84% |
| Voters: 151. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#62 (permalink) | |
|
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
|
Quote:
I forget you were at Sill Great round, for a first gen seeker. IF all the fins deployed, the battery activated, the seeker head tracked, there was no rain, fog, dust, smoke to obscure the laser bounce and the moving target maintained a steady heading with no sudden burst of speed or turns. and stayed inside the firing template. The PDF codes were correct. BUT on a clear St Barbara's day, with low humidity, no cross winds and 70 deg temps, after the chaplin had blessed the round, the Tech rep had done his voodoo and the projo was handled by gunnery dept instructors everything worked just fine. One shot, One kill ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
You know M21sniper, I might be mistaken but that rifle in your signature picture look alot like an SVD, I didnt have time to read this whole thread but I thought Id just point that out... for the main reason your puting it down, and yes I completly agree with _______ I dont remember who posted it but the SVD wasnt even origionally a sniper rifle
__________________
Dont change fact... Scincerely, Napoleon |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
__________________
"Finger never touches Trigger unless some one is going too need a grave digger" (Me)[ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
Something kinda offtopic here, I personally like the idea of inluding alot more sharpshooters in the typical infantry formation. Not snipers and the specialized survival and stealth training that that entails but specialized training in long range shooting and given an accurized weapon.
Another question is which is more important in a sniper rifle the accuracy of bolt actions or the rate of fire and comparitiely less human movement of semi-auto's (the accuracy is not much of a difference anymore between quality semiauto's and boltactions) |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 (permalink) | |
|
Thats me with my precious
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
SR25 isnt a bad rifle, but why do we need to change them? Oh well. As long as it's just as good or better. And I agree with putting more sharpshooters in each squad. I want a cool, gard-hitting rifle when I join, not a pea-shooter. I'd rather have a gun that puts an enemy down in one shot and carry 1/4 the ammo, then having a rifle that puts an enemy down in three. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Most Influential Gun | Wraith601 | Small Arms and Personal Weapons | 27 | 05-24-2008 10:11 AM |
| Which choice is better for becoming a good sniper- USMC or Army | illusha | The Western Alliance | 101 | 01-28-2008 21:31 PM |
| Conflict in Iraq: The sniper who shoots on video | Ray | The War in Iraq | 3 | 11-10-2006 07:03 AM |
| A story for Sniper | Ray | World Affairs Board Pub | 15 | 09-04-2006 14:58 PM |
| Sniper School Teaches 'Very Personal Way To Kill' | Shek | The Western Alliance | 11 | 06-12-2006 23:44 PM |