Thread: South Australian Police Gun Deal outrages victims' groups.

Typical liberal socialist mentality, blame the object rather than the criminals. I wonder if the same victim's rights group blame that tight, short dress for the rape? Maybe we should outlaw revealing clothing to reduce sex crimes. Maybe sharia law does have some merits.

Ever notice liberals like to destroy things? They want to destroy perfectly good guns that could serve well in the US 2nd hand market. Liberals here destroyed thousands of used cars to get people to buy new cars, at tax payer's expense.

Beat this scumbag until he asks to be shot.Then continue beating him,since you don't have the right to own a gun.

Melting used police revolvers will accomplish what? These aren't even the kind of weapon that is behind most of these crimes they imagine they are fighting, these are expensive, low capacity guns, unlikely to be used by criminals - who favor very cheap or high capacity automatic weapons. Stupid PC idiots - they have manure for brains. Even manure is more useful than they are.

In an ideal Liberal police force:

Stop! Or I'll say stop again!

I'm still trying to understand why selling the used guns to a country damn near halfway across the world will offend families in Australia

The comments at the bottom of this article Second-hand SA police guns tresale is `wrong' | Adelaide Now - Is more indicative of perceptions. The present gun laws got in on the acts of a mentally disturbed bloke in Tasmania. The Gun laws were introduced and passed parliament in one of the quickest moves ever in Australian legislation. In my view, the way people are prosecuted - regardless of 'criminal' or misdemeanour history, and the complete lack of acknowledgement that might happen from the Parliament. This was an act of treachery.
The DPP doesn't have a choice in the way charges are bought - and it's left up to the magistrate to decide.The Magistrate will decide impartially according to the act, therefor, it's critical to negotiate with the DPP before the case goes to trial. The DPP then must sympathise in it's submission to the magistrate so the magistrate can make a decision without it going to trial because the Perp, faced with a criminal charge, has no choice other than to take the maximum course of avoiding the charge, because of the repercussions of the charge. If Honest Joe pleaded guilty on face value to charges that were true, it would stuff their career & travel potential.

Anyone that argues that that is a fair outcome is a fool.
Of course the lawyers will first of all tell you that any charge re the firearms act very, very serious charge - who wouldn't - a potential criminal conviction awaits. The devil is always in the detail of these acts, and that is what makes it Treachery - the sheer loops the defendant must jump through because of the punishment on face value that awaits.

O'Connell is the kind of jerk that is so removed from reality that he's has a conviction to a principle' IE akin to the Hitlers of society that have no tolerance or leeway for reality, and won't recognise how harshly people are treated so his conviction can be realised...