![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
Weird Cartridge Nomenclature
OK. Let's start. The .38 American handgun calibers are mostly .356-.358 except for the .38 S&W, which, as noted in another thread, is .360-.361. The bore diameter of Civil War era .36s was .356-.358. About .36. Sounds reasonable. Of course, expecting any of the .38s to be ~.38 would be unreasonable. The .357 magnum is .356-.358, so it breaks with crazy tradition.
Now. The .44/40 cartridge held a .44 (actually, .427) caliber bullet & the cartridge traditionally held 40gr of black powder. However, the .30/30 was a .30 (well, ~.308-.311) caliber round developed after the advent of smokeless powder & was never commercially loaded with black powder as far as I know. So, given all that, what was the caliber of the bullet in the .38/40 cartridge? If you guessed .40 (well, ~.41), you're right. A little disturbed, but right. Why on earth didn't Winchester call it the .40/40? You got me. Now, go wild. ![]() Prof |
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 17,410
Country:
|
German 7.92mm X 57mm is called 8mm Mauser. Well, which is it? Is it 7.92mm or 8mm in diameter?
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb. |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
Prof |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
Welll... Here we go again. The .22LR, that lovely cartridge, is .223 cal. The .22WMR (Winchester Magnum Rimfire) is .224. They are not interchangeable in .22WMR guns. Why? Mostly due to cartridge taper, although the teeny little 1/1000" diameter difference gets into the act. Question is, why on earth did Winchester, & why would the firearms manufacturers, tolerate a newly-introduced .22 (WMR) round that didn't allow the use of .22 shorts, longs & long rifles? I mean, this was a while back, somewhat before everyone on Earth expected corporate executives to be lyin' cheatin' thieves. Seems like a really dumb decision. Any thoughts?
The .45 colt vs .45acp has less of a craziness problem. Bullet diameter (lead bullet; subtract ~.001" for jacketed) is .454 vs .452. You could pretty much swap'em. The big difference is in cartridge length. The Army wanted a grip-fed semiauto & you'd have to have pretty unusual hands to hold something like a 1911 in .45 Colt. Prof |
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
A few months after Winchester brought it out, Marlin copied it and introduced it as the .30-30 for the 1893 rifle, using the standard convention of the weight in grains of the powder charge, only this time it was smokeless powder. Winchester kept the .30 WCF on the headstamp up until the '40's, then changed it to .30-30. Today we call it the .30-30 Winchester, but it was actually Marlin that introduced it under that name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 17,410
Country:
|
Why are rounds designed by John Browning called "automatic COLT pistol?"
Ever noticed that most of Browning designs don't carry his name? Colt 1911; Winchester 1892; ACP instead of ABP (automatic Browning pistol)...etc. Here's a tangent: one of the most famous guns to carry Browning's name was actually not his design, the Browning Hi-Power. It was completed by Dieudonné Saive at Fabrique Nationale based on Browning's design. |
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
The High-Power design was started by JMB, but finished after his death. He designed guns for Remington, Winchester, Colt, FN. The Browning Arms Company wasn't formed until after his death. He never really did much in the way of manufacturing on his own, but he was a design genius. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 17,410
Country:
|
He also marketed them in Europe through FN.
Quote:
He was GOD of firearm designs. No man before or since has equaled his genius. I don't think anyone could ever equal his prolific output in firearm designs. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Share this thread with friends: |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Big Battleship Doctrine | Defcon 6 | Battleships Forum | 307 | 04-17-2008 05:58 AM |
| SSK 6.5 MPC: Best Assault Rifle Cartridge for 21st Century Warfare? | Stan187 | Small Arms and Personal Weapons | 43 | 05-22-2007 17:17 PM |
| Weird Pets | THL | Pics & Videos | 11 | 12-06-2005 13:17 PM |
| Russian S-4M Silent Pistol | sniperdude411 | Small Arms and Personal Weapons | 0 | 06-27-2005 23:01 PM |
| An anti 5.56mm article... | troung | Small Arms and Personal Weapons | 84 | 03-27-2005 13:28 PM |