+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 30

Thread: Chinese 9mm police revolver

  1. #1
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,322
    Country: United States

    Chinese 9mm police revolver

    ×óÂÖǹ֮±³ÐÄÆª - ·ÉÑï¾üÊ - ÐÅÏ¢×ÊѶ - [¾üÊÂÖ÷Ìâ] - ½µØ¿ñì*

    This is pretty interesting. I wonder why they would move from Makarov to a revolver.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  2. #2
    Patron
    Join Date
    09 Mar 09
    Posts
    212
    Country: China
    The original consideration is a revolver bullet has less penetration to avoid hitting another one, and in case of a dud, the shooter can go directly to the next firing, citing some cases policemen were killed or wounded while unloading the pistol.

  3. #3
    Regular
    Join Date
    30 Jan 04
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    74
    Country: United States
    Interesting. Looks like it's got a manually applied safety just above the cylinder release latch.
    "It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Emiliano Zapata

  4. #4
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,322
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Kalvan View Post
    Interesting. Looks like it's got a manually applied safety just above the cylinder release latch.
    Yes it does. I am not aware of any other modern removers with a manual safety.

    The gun uses 9mm rimmed rounds. Supposedly much tamer than the standard 9mm Para.

    The link doesn't have anything in it other than pictures and some readers chiming in. The posts by the readers have strange grammar. Almost like from Hong Kong.
    Attached Images    
    Last edited by gunnut; 02 Jul 09, at 23:36.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  5. #5
    Regular
    Join Date
    30 Jan 04
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    74
    Country: United States
    I am not aware of any other modern removers with a manual safety.
    I've seen them on some inexpensive imported single-action .22 revolvers. Essentially they rotate up and block the hammer from coming forward.

    The gun uses 9mm rimmed rounds. Supposedly much tamer than the standard 9mm Para.
    I'd guess they are some sort of takeoff on 9x18mm Makarov. A Makarov Auto-Rim as it were.
    "It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Emiliano Zapata

  6. #6
    Regular
    Join Date
    01 Mar 08
    Posts
    151
    Country: United States
    OK GN. I'd love to read that whole thing but....... So is there one in english or a translation. Dumb question perhaps, but can you read that?



    Because that would be really cool!

  7. #7
    Contributor captain's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Jun 07
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    594
    Country: Australia
    Hey Gunnut,

    Notice anything strange about a couple of those photos?

    Have a look at the 3rd photo down on the link you posted and at the photo of the nickel one.

    The first photo shows considerable light space between the chamber and the top strap and the nickel one seems the same even allowing that the chamber is revolving past the indents into lockup.
    With the trigger in the forward position, there should not be that amount of space between the strap and chamber and should appear to align with the barrell.

    How the hell does it index and align with the forcing cone like that?

    Cheers.
    Last edited by captain; 03 Jul 09, at 15:14.

  8. #8
    Contributor cadpipe's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Mar 08
    Location
    Red State
    Posts
    446
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by captain View Post
    Hey Gunnut,

    Notice anything strange about a couple of those photos?

    Have a look at the 3rd photo down on the link you posted and at the photo of the nickel one.

    The first photo shows considerable light space between the chamber and the top strap and the nickel one seems the same even allowing that the chamber is revolving past the indents into lockup.
    With the trigger in the forward position, there should not be that amount of space between the strap and chamber and should appear to align with the barrell.

    How the hell does it index and align with the forcing cone like that?

    Cheers.
    Optical illusion, I think, The light you are seeing in the 3rd photo is light reflecting off the cylinder, looked at the photos with magnification and everyting looks as it should be. At least to my untrained eye.
    CADPIPE

  9. #9
    Contributor captain's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Jun 07
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    594
    Country: Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by cadpipe View Post
    Optical illusion, I think, The light you are seeing in the 3rd photo is light reflecting off the cylinder, looked at the photos with magnification and everyting looks as it should be. At least to my untrained eye.
    Yes, I wondered that, cant find my reading specs!

    Cheers.

  10. #10
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,322
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by 7thsfsniper View Post
    OK GN. I'd love to read that whole thing but....... So is there one in english or a translation. Dumb question perhaps, but can you read that?

    Because that would be really cool!
    There is actually no accompanying article talking about this revolver or the context in which the photographs were taken. Most of the stuff on the top and on the side are ads. The stuff at the bottom are readers' reactions. I can read some of those since they are written in simplified characters. I can guess some of them based on the context.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  11. #11
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,322
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by captain View Post
    Hey Gunnut,

    Notice anything strange about a couple of those photos?

    Have a look at the 3rd photo down on the link you posted and at the photo of the nickel one.

    The first photo shows considerable light space between the chamber and the top strap and the nickel one seems the same even allowing that the chamber is revolving past the indents into lockup.
    With the trigger in the forward position, there should not be that amount of space between the strap and chamber and should appear to align with the barrell.

    How the hell does it index and align with the forcing cone like that?

    Cheers.
    I think that's the light reflecting off the fluting of the cylinder in the 3rd photo.

    I don't think any of them is finished in nickel. Could be a dull parkerized/phosphate finish that appears to be grey rather than black.

    Ah...I see cadpipe had already addressed your question.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  12. #12
    Military Professional toemag's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Jan 07
    Location
    Bavaria
    Posts
    904
    Country: United Kingdom
    WTF, why do I have BS going through my mind having just visited the link and read what has already been posted. Everyone knows that cop's are cool and want the latest newest most highly advanced equipment at their disposal.

    This revolver is not Gucci kit, and neither was the pistol that it may be replacing, but at least the pistol was a tried an tested weapon, millions have been produced all over the world for one reason or another, that will get the job done in 99,999999999999999999999999999999999%. As to the few who were killed or injured due to stoppages at an in opportune moment, sh!t happens, Murphy strikes again, and I'll place bet's that the reason for them stoppages were down to human error, either on the maintenance or handling drills.

    Tony
    Yet another ex-tankie of 1 RTR origin.

  13. #13
    Regular
    Join Date
    04 May 09
    Posts
    112
    This is what happens when your government can't afford fancy Austrian or Swiss pistols. The get lower quality ones that jam and don't work properly, and downgrade to revolvers.

  14. #14
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,322
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by roffelskates View Post
    This is what happens when your government can't afford fancy Austrian or Swiss pistols. The get lower quality ones that jam and don't work properly, and downgrade to revolvers.
    Actually Maks are very serviceable and by far not crude pistols. They aren't Glocks or HKs, but they are not junk either.

    Revolvers are easier to operate and require less training. To the Chinese, who aren't familiar with guns like the Americans, something simple is desired.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  15. #15
    Senior Contributor Triple C's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Apr 06
    Location
    Chicago IL
    Posts
    1,686
    Country: Taiwan
    Quote Originally Posted by 7thsfsniper View Post
    OK GN. I'd love to read that whole thing but....... So is there one in english or a translation. Dumb question perhaps, but can you read that?
    I can read it, but there isn't much to translate except ooh's and aah's. There is no information about the mechanics of the weapon, just comments on the pics.

    I am not buying the reason for replacing automatic pistols. It is easier to use, yes. But adopting it because you don't want to do a misfire drill? Ideally, people should be trained to rack the slide of their pistol for duds like it's second nature. On a side note, Taiwan abandoned revolvers for a similarly absurd reason--it takes longer to fire a unloaded, safety-off automatic pistol in case the criminal grabbed the officer's gun.

    If they are that close, they should have been cuffed--if they are that dangerous, they should have been shot.
    All those who are merciful with the cruel will come to be cruel to the merciful.
    -Talmud Kohelet Rabbah, 7:16.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. China the only Paradise in the world!
    By Ray in forum International Economy
    Replies: 96
    Last Post: 17 Jul 08,, 16:02
  2. Uighurs struggle in a world reshaped by Chinese influx
    By Ray in forum International Politics
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 01 May 08,, 04:03

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts