ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Small Arms and Personal Weapons
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-26-2008, 17:09 PM   #31 (permalink)
T_igger_cs_30
Military Professional
 
T_igger_cs_30's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,943
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by omon View Post
^^ does he need to show negative examples?
media got that covered pretty much.
just a question
__________________
<img src=http://C:\Documents and Settings\Wayne Smith\My Documents\002...My Pictures border=0 alt= />FEAR NAUGHT

I don't work here ...I am an analyst!
T_igger_cs_30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 17:09 PM   #32 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 1,793
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesCash View Post
Well, the way I see it, there will always be criminality in modern western society. I guesstimate that in the Netherlands, 99% of the unlawful gun owners are not intending to use their gun against you, me or any other lawabiding citizen.

Whereas the gunlaws in America do not only allow your random propertycriminal/scumbags/deprived teenagers relatively easy acces to firearms. It also makes them more likely to buy guns as they too want to defend themselves against all the guns privately owned. I think this is a sort of vicious circle as the more power the normal people have, the more power the criminals want to have. This power is way over the lethal threshold with firearms.

I'm probably oversimplifying.
if you are rober, or rapist (for example) would you like your victim to be armed?

and if you are the victim, would you rather have a gun or not?

guns are here already, no bans or laws gonna change that, there is no way to get rid of all guns, illegal onse you can,t track, and take away, so they will be here regardless.
if all registerd guns are taken away(cuz i,m sure as hell you wont find any record of ownership of illegal ones, and adresses where to get them), who will be hurt? the ones who legaly owned them and lost them, or the ones who have them illegaly and still kept them?
who will have a last laugh??
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin
omon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 19:11 PM   #33 (permalink)
Herodotus
Patron
 
Join Date: 04-05-07
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 153
Country:
If I'm going to go down, I would at least like a fighting chance. I think that if criminals know that their victims could (but not necessarily do) have a concealed weapon maybe they would think twice before robbing or raping him or her. There is always the danger though of psychopaths who will kill no matter what, and also the danger that bringing a firearm into any situation could escalate it.

I like the Swiss model personally; every male serves, and everybody keeps a gun in the home. Not only that but they train regulalry with them. A nice, orderly, peaceful society---the Swiss, and I sure wouldn't want to mess with one.
Herodotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 19:25 PM   #34 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 8,594
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herodotus View Post
If I'm going to go down, I would at least like a fighting chance. I think that if criminals know that their victims could (but not necessarily do) have a concealed weapon maybe they would think twice before robbing or raping him or her. There is always the danger though of psychopaths who will kill no matter what, and also the danger that bringing a firearm into any situation could escalate it.

I like the Swiss model personally; every male serves, and everybody keeps a gun in the home. Not only that but they train regulalry with them. A nice, orderly, peaceful society---the Swiss, and I sure wouldn't want to mess with one.
That's exactly the intent.

It's not that we want everyone to be armed and get into shootouts with crooks every day. It's the fact that the crooks just might think twice about his next enterprise if there's a possibility that he'll come out on the short end.

Criminals are humans too. By that I mean they go through the normal cost-benefit analysis before committing a crime. If the chance of getting away is 100%, I'll bet you dollar to donuts that he'll go ahead with it. If the chance drops to near zero, he'll probably move on to his next adventure.

100% of the crime not committed do not become statistics...

(variation of Wayne Gretzy's quote on shooting the puck)
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 20:12 PM   #35 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 7,734
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan187 View Post
That may very well be true, but that does not make it make sense any more than before, and I think you'll agree with me on that. If the big problem in DC is people being mugged, while their homes will be nice and cozy and protected, without carry permits the result will be one of two:
1. People still getting mugged outside just as much
2. People breaking the law and carrying their legally acquired firearms on their person
Well, I don't know what the stats are, but safer homes is a step in the right direction.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 21:44 PM   #36 (permalink)
GraniteForge
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 01-28-07
Location: NH, NM, and sometimes San Diego
Posts: 94
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by T_igger_cs_30 View Post
I read with interest your posts and am extrememly happy that those situations worked out ok for you...........do you show or tell your students any negative stories that may impact there decision regarding the carrying of weapons? or is your lbrary only full of positive experiences?
As it happens, I don't know of any negative stories concerning lawfully armed private citizens. If I did, and an appropriate moment came up in class to use it, I certainly would. However, I don't want you to get the idea that we feed our students politics or philosophy with the training. We don't. I know I am never going to have as much time with the students as I would like, even in the best case, and I think that spending a lot of time on anecdotes - however on point - is just stealing time from the class. I always try to accomodate a small amount of such questions, but beyond that I make sure that are held until after class.

Beyond that, its not really my place to be concerned with whether or not someone chooses to carry a gun. If they're in a basic non-LEO class, then they have already reached some sort of comfort level, and in my other classes that's not an issue. I just want to make sure that their right to do so isn't restricted should they wish to make that decision.
GraniteForge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 21:46 PM   #37 (permalink)
T_igger_cs_30
Military Professional
 
T_igger_cs_30's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,943
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraniteForge View Post
As it happens, I don't know of any negative stories concerning lawfully armed private citizens. If I did, and an appropriate moment came up in class to use it, I certainly would. However, I don't want you to get the idea that we feed our students politics or philosophy with the training. We don't. I know I am never going to have as much time with the students as I would like, even in the best case, and I think that spending a lot of time on anecdotes - however on point - is just stealing time from the class. I always try to accomodate a small amount of such questions, but beyond that I make sure that are held until after class.

Beyond that, its not really my place to be concerned with whether or not someone chooses to carry a gun. If they're in a basic non-LEO class, then they have already reached some sort of comfort level, and in my other classes that's not an issue. I just want to make sure that their right to do so isn't restricted should they wish to make that decision.
Fair comment GF, but I cannot believe that there are no negative examples.
T_igger_cs_30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 21:54 PM   #38 (permalink)
Stan187
WAB BOUNCER
Senior Contributor
 
Stan187's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-06
Posts: 2,152
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herodotus View Post
I like the Swiss model personally; every male serves, and everybody keeps a gun in the home. Not only that but they train regulalry with them. A nice, orderly, peaceful society---the Swiss, and I sure wouldn't want to mess with one.
And when indeed you look up the numbers on burgulary in Switzerland, you will find, unsuprisingly, that not many people want to go into a house with bad intent when every single house has a good gun, good ammo, and trained shooter.
__________________
In Iran people belive pepsi stands for pay each penny save israel. -urmomma158
The Russian Navy is still a threat, but only to those unlucky enough to be Russian sailors.-highsea
Stan187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 21:55 PM   #39 (permalink)
Stan187
WAB BOUNCER
Senior Contributor
 
Stan187's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-06
Posts: 2,152
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem View Post
Well, I don't know what the stats are, but safer homes is a step in the right direction.

-dale
qft
Stan187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 23:19 PM   #40 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 7,734
Country:
All of this reminds me that I need to get my CCW permit renewed this year. Now I just have to figure out how to do it.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 23:55 PM   #41 (permalink)
Herodotus
Patron
 
Join Date: 04-05-07
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 153
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by T_igger_cs_30 View Post
Fair comment GF, but I cannot believe that there are no negative examples.
From 1993 to 2002,1 data from the BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI) show that 175 workers were killed on the job as the result of an accidental gunshot wound. While this total represented only 0.3 percent of the 61,146 workplace fatalities suffered by all workers during this 10-year span, these fatalities are especially alarming because they involve firearms and are prevalent in military and protective service occupations.

Fatal Occupational Injuries from Accidental Gunshot Wounds, 1993-2002

This is for the general population in 2005:

Death Statistics Tables

776 died of accidental discharge of a firearrm. There is always some risk in owning a gun, but it seems like guns are far less likely to result in an accidental death than say driving on the freeway.
Herodotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 01:53 AM   #42 (permalink)
T_igger_cs_30
Military Professional
 
T_igger_cs_30's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,943
Country:
Herodotus

Thats why I love this topic, H comparing being shot to dieing of a heart attack or some other medical ailment is like asking my ex wife if I was a good boy
T_igger_cs_30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 04:07 AM   #43 (permalink)
GraniteForge
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 01-28-07
Location: NH, NM, and sometimes San Diego
Posts: 94
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by T_igger_cs_30 View Post
Fair comment GF, but I cannot believe that there are no negative examples.
My home state drove out the foreign occupation army about 233 years ago, and since then, law-abiding citizens have always been free to carry concealed handguns for any lawful purpose, albeit under a licensing system since the early 1920s. I would be absolutely shocked if - over the literally millions of concealed carry days, consisting of the aggregate of many hundreds of thousands of persons, spread out over 233 years - not a single one of those persons had done something boneheaded.

That being said, we only added the right to keep and bear arms to our state Constitution in the 1980s. And yes, I think a law passed way back then is just as relevant today. Plus, the guns are the same, so you don't have to deal with the red herring of 'primitive technology.'
GraniteForge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2008, 19:48 PM   #44 (permalink)
FOG3
Patron
 
Join Date: 05-04-06
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by T_igger_cs_30 View Post
I always find fascinating the issue's in the US regarding the right to Bear Arms, and the passion it invokes across the US.
What are your views on the current issue before the Supreme court?
And, given the the modern day and age we live in is an amendment added in 1791, which was a very viable amendment then, truly viable now?
Quote:
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
You mean that one? The one that should render the nitpicking over verbage irrelevant? The Constitution doesn't grant rights, it merely serves as a contractual "gurantee" against the federal government making attempts on those rights. The problem is that like any contract it's only good if it's actually enforced, and the guys profiting off it not being enforced on them are obviously not the ones to be trusted with that responsibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesCash View Post
Well, the way I see it, there will always be criminality in modern western society. I guesstimate that in the Netherlands, 99% of the unlawful gun owners are not intending to use their gun against you, me or any other lawabiding citizen.

Whereas the gunlaws in America do not only allow your random propertycriminal/scumbags/deprived teenagers relatively easy acces to firearms. It also makes them more likely to buy guns as they too want to defend themselves against all the guns privately owned. I think this is a sort of vicious circle as the more power the normal people have, the more power the criminals want to have. This power is way over the lethal threshold with firearms.

I'm probably oversimplifying.
If a guy vents your carotid artery with a shiv are you somehow less dead then if he manages get you with a lucky shot? If they can make shivs in a prison setting with all the monitoring and everything else, you think they can't when they're out on the streets? What, are you one of those people that have seen so many movies you've been convinced spray and pray actually allows someone to hit something, especially with the gangsta approach?

Hey, when seconds count the Police are only minutes away. How you want to handle the issue of your not ending up in a body bag is your problem, they can't hold your hand 24/7 even if they wanted to. But then I expect you're a good sized male and being a good size male don't think you can be put at a physical disadvantage even if you are a sedentary being. Well what about the female half of things, hmm?

Martial Arts you say? That's nice, so just how many years of dedicated training are you free to just get your skill level up to a meaningful level, and is your system really going to cut the mustard when a guy actually moves in on you on his terms?

Last edited by FOG3 : 04-16-2008 at 20:28 PM.
FOG3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Panzer IV ausf H Invincible?! Triple C Land Forces 43 04-30-2008 23:15 PM
Future Battleship/Capital Ship Discussion Defcon 6 Battleships Forum 170 02-25-2008 16:14 PM
A Marine named "Mitch" vaughn The World Wars 5 12-07-2007 02:04 AM
GuadalCanal Remixed Captain C The World Wars 33 09-08-2007 19:22 PM
‘Divide and rule’ through Hudood bill? Ray Political Discussions 3 08-23-2006 04:12 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:16 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8