Originally posted by Oracle
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2018 American Political Scene
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by snapper View PostMy recommendation would be to report to the Mueller Inquiry.Last edited by Oracle; 03 Nov 18,, 06:49.Politicians are elected to serve...far too many don't see it that way - Albany Rifles! || Loyalty to country always. Loyalty to government, when it deserves it - Mark Twain! || I am a far left millennial!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Red Team View PostWell to name the most recent example, the guy was endorsing lethal force as a primary response for a hypothetical case of migrants throwing rocks at troops. American police have quelled riots of thousands of people doing this without immediately resorting to shooting into crowds, why should the response suddenly be so severe?
Where is the issue?Last edited by Versus; 03 Nov 18,, 09:04.
Comment
-
Well...yeah, why I'm not supprised.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mekxrYxEvEA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LOoUPX5_xc
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oracle View PostReport what? That US should fight for Ukraine? You have no point, nothing on Trump and you go on and on and on. Write a letter to Trump and see where that takes you. AFAIK, nobody in this board are on Trump's team, and ranting here everyday about Ukraine won't solve your issue. Your obsession with Trump is doing you no good, and it's driving you mad.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Versus View PostI, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."
Where is the issue?"Draft beer, not people."
Comment
-
I'm wondering which professional Army would listen to its leader and shoot at unarmed civilians. Trump saved himself a big embarrassment.Politicians are elected to serve...far too many don't see it that way - Albany Rifles! || Loyalty to country always. Loyalty to government, when it deserves it - Mark Twain! || I am a far left millennial!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oracle View PostI'm wondering which professional Army would listen to its leader and shoot at unarmed civilians. Trump saved himself a big embarrassment.
That being said, it will be a cold day in hell before I order fire on unarmed civilians. I will accept their surrender or I will force their surrender. Rock throwers will be identified and treated as illegal combattants.Chimo
Comment
-
Originally posted by Red Team View PostIf I have to explain to you why shooting at unarmed civilians is fundamentally wrong, then clearly we are on two different pages.
Except if you like to see mutilated corpses hanging from a bridge on a highway or videos of your law enforcment officers being cut to pieces like ours were.
They are not migrants nor refugees, to begin with, yet they are political activists with hostile intent and agenda against US.Last edited by Versus; 03 Nov 18,, 22:17.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Versus View Post
They are not migrants nor refugees, to begin with, yet they are political activists with hostile intent and agenda against US.
After what Albanian "refugees" and "migrants" did few decades later, after havoc that current "migrants" and "refugees" are doing all accross Eu and in Serbia (although it is suppressed), my answer is unequivocally-ON SITE.
Except if you like to see mutilated corpses hanging from a bridge on a highway or videos of your law enforcment officers being cut to pieces like ours were."Draft beer, not people."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Red Team View PostIf I have to explain to you why shooting at unarmed civilians is fundamentally wrong, then clearly we are on two different pages.sigpic
Win nervously lose tragically - Reds C C
Comment
-
Originally posted by WABs_OOE View PostLethal force is authorized in defence of self and position, in this case the border. Just because they're unarmed civilians does not relieve you of your responsibility to defend your position.
That being said, it will be a cold day in hell before I order fire on unarmed civilians. I will accept their surrender or I will force their surrender. Rock throwers will be identified and treated as illegal combattants.
This whole conversation is somewhere between bizarre and insane.sigpic
Win nervously lose tragically - Reds C C
Comment
-
Originally posted by Red Team View PostYou must have some pretty damning evidence that no one, including the US government, has to draw such a conclusion.
So to prevent a hypothetical bloodbath from occurring, we should commit a literal bloodbath? I hate invoking Godwin's law, but this sounds like stuff straight out of Mein kampf.sigpic
Win nervously lose tragically - Reds C C
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bigfella View PostThis shouldn't be a military operation to begin with. Unless there is evidence the crowd has more serious weaponry than a few stones they picked up they should be handled by law enforcement. If they do become violent there are riot police who have far more appropriate training and equipment to deal with that.
This whole conversation is somewhere between bizarre and insane.
Different books, different bookshops, and different planets."Draft beer, not people."
Comment
Comment