Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: Argentine submarine 'San Juan' missing/losst at sea.

  1. #16
    Senior Contributor Monash's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Mar 10
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,634
    So, as feared it looks like the search for survivors has been officially abandoned and it is now a mission to locate and if possible recover the wreck. My deep condolences to the to the families of the crew. Hopefully the bodies of their loved ones can be recovered and the cause of the accident determined, although given the depths involved the latter will probably be a big ask.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-0...e-crew/9216042

    Related to this I think this accident could well spell the end for Argentina's submarine service. The following is only guesswork on my part of course but their Navy only has one fully operational sub left (the Santa Cruz) which is currently going through exactly the same cut price, 'mid-life refit' the San Juan was put through. (I know they have the Salta but my understanding is that it is restricted to 'training' duties only and it seldom if ever puts to sea, let alone conducting long duration operational missions.)

    Even if the Navy decides to continue with that refit the need to run over every detail three times over to eliminate any possible error will blow their time-line for completion out into the early 20's (at best) by which time the Santa Cruz will what? 37/38 years old!

    And if they don't refit then the Argentine Government would have to go through the process of going to tender and purchasing new/used replacement vessels (assuming they could find the money). A process which I doubt at this stage could be completed before the refitted Santa Cruz was due anyway.

    Either way looks to me like there will be a lot of hard decisions to make in Buenos Aires shortly.
    Last edited by Monash; 02 Dec 17, at 02:33.

  2. #17
    Senior Contributor Bigfella's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 Jan 07
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    9,456
    Good points Monash.

    Its a reminder that choosing to operate certain sorts of systems demands the willingness to commit the resources to getting it right. In peace time having; poor or mishandled guns might kill soldiers one at a time; poor or mishandled tanks might kill a few more; poor or mishandled aircraft might kill a dozen or more; poor or mishandled ships & subs can end many, many more lives than that.

    There is a fair bit of evidence that Argentina's naval ambitions do not remotely match its willingness to invest in them. It may just have cost them dearly. Might be time for some very serious re-thinking.


    Win nervously lose tragically - Reds C C

  3. #18
    Turbanator Senior Contributor Double Edge's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Sep 10
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    7,727

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Seeing Europe through Argentine default
    By cyppok in forum International Economy
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11 Dec 12,, 11:39
  2. Where is Egypt's Juan Carlos?
    By Ironduke in forum Arab Protests of 2010-2011
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02 Feb 11,, 18:18
  3. Argentine Air Force capability?
    By dave angel in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 19 Apr 10,, 03:47
  4. Range Report: 1909 Argentine Mauser 30.06
    By maximusslade in forum Small Arms and Personal Weapons
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 17 Aug 09,, 22:53

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •