Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 61 to 69 of 69

Thread: New Navy FFG(X) RFI released

  1. #61
    Senior Contributor SteveDaPirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Aug 13
    Location
    Kansas City, United States
    Posts
    1,391
    Quote Originally Posted by thebard View Post
    Something tells me this won't be happening.

    https://news.usni.org/2018/05/30/fin...ore#more-33972

    ...but that espresso machine....
    The FREMMs are awesome ships, I just wonder if they are too much ship for the role they are being asked to fill.

    European nations tend to build large frigates that rival full blooded destroyers in capabilities and firepower, if not magazine depth.

    I think the USN would benefit from sacrificing some capability for more hulls when it comes to frigates however. The USN doesn't need frigates that can act like destroyers in a pinch; they already have a ton of actual destroyers that can handle those problems as soon as they are freed up from filling in as overly capable frigates.

  2. #62
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    05 Sep 06
    Posts
    4,269
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveDaPirate View Post
    The FREMMs are awesome ships, I just wonder if they are too much ship for the role they are being asked to fill.
    Eh, Fincantieri could have pitched PPA instead, their OPV line. They're optionally less armed, have less electronics*, are more modular... oh, and they're bigger than FREMMs.

    * actually i think they might be using some parts there that will be taken off of FREMMs as part of their first MLU.

  3. #63
    Senior Contributor SteveDaPirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Aug 13
    Location
    Kansas City, United States
    Posts
    1,391
    Quote Originally Posted by kato View Post
    oh, and they're bigger than FREMMs.
    Watch the USN buy 20 more Burke hulls, throw a 76mm gun on top and call them Frigates... or better yet, they sure love the San Antonio hulls!

    Name:  Blog-pic.jpg
Views: 106
Size:  66.6 KB

  4. #64
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    05 Sep 06
    Posts
    4,269
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveDaPirate View Post
    Watch the USN buy 20 more Burke hulls, throw a 76mm gun on top and call them Frigates...
    The Japanese Coast Guard Shikishima class is literally the size of a Burke... and that turret forward is a twin 35mm cued to her air defense radar.


  5. #65
    Senior Contributor SteveDaPirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Aug 13
    Location
    Kansas City, United States
    Posts
    1,391
    Quote Originally Posted by kato View Post
    The Japanese Coast Guard Shikishima class is literally the size of a Burke... and that turret forward is a twin 35mm cued to her air defense radar.

    A range of 20,000 nmi... Holy Smokes! That's a ton of fuel!

  6. #66
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    05 Sep 08
    Posts
    1,935
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveDaPirate View Post
    A range of 20,000 nmi... Holy Smokes! That's a ton of fuel!
    I guess they want to be able to stay out a long time without the need for refueling. It would, at least partially, explain the size of the hull.

  7. #67
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    05 Sep 06
    Posts
    4,269
    Nah, the original purpose was to escort nuclear waste transports to apparently Sellafield and other refurbishment facilities in Europe and possibly the Eastern US - and fuel rods the other way around. Without those transports and the escorts going to any ports inbetween to avoid... problems. That's what the range envelope was intended for.

    They're now being used somewhat similarly to what Absalon and F125 classes in Europe are used for in maneuvers, i.e. as command ships for naval taskforces composed of small patrol units. The Japanese do such maneuvers e.g. with Indonesia and iirc the Philippines.

    China recently one-upped them with a pair of 12,000-ton 540-ft coast guard cutters.

  8. #68
    Senior Contributor SteveDaPirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Aug 13
    Location
    Kansas City, United States
    Posts
    1,391
    Speaking of the F125, what the hell were they designed for?

    It looks like a destroyer with a big gun on a 7000+ ton hull but it has no VLS or torpedos? Deploying 4 RHIBs out of funny looking side doors is kind of cool I guess but it's in a weird spot where it seems like massive overkill for hunting pirates compared to corvettes or cutters, yet larger but a lot less capable than an F124 in a standup fight.

    The descriptions I've seen say it's supposed to be on long duration but low intensity deployments, but in that case why not go for something like USS Lewis B. Puller (ESB-3) to serve as a mobile base for helos and small boats? It's a lot more capable in that role and a lot cheaper to boot.

    And why is it so dang heavy despite the light armament? If anything I would think a bunch of open space to house and deploy RHIBs would decrease the ship's density.
    Last edited by SteveDaPirate; 01 Jun 18, at 20:39.

  9. #69
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    05 Sep 06
    Posts
    4,269
    There's a whole thread for that question, ya know.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Terrorist released
    By tankie in forum International Defense and Terrorism Topics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08 Nov 16,, 03:17
  2. This woman should be released...
    By lemontree in forum World Affairs Board Pub
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 18 Feb 14,, 17:05
  3. INDIAN NAVY vs PAKISTAN NAVY in a limited war scenario
    By raghavmundra200 in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 16 Apr 10,, 17:00
  4. Should've Hess been released?
    By Ironduke in forum The World Wars
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 22 Feb 09,, 10:50

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •