Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 56

Thread: USS Fitzgerald collision

  1. #16
    tankie Military Professional tankie's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Nov 06
    Location
    Darlington UK
    Posts
    14,644
    Quote Originally Posted by Michigan_Guy View Post
    They found the missing crewmen in a flooded berthing compartment :(
    RIP Sailors , RIP , another 7 to the green fields , salute . My condolences to their kin .


    Trust gets you killed, love gets you hurt, and being REAL gets you hated.

  2. #17
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    13 Nov 07
    Posts
    3,828
    My god how could this have happened. RIP.

  3. #18
    Senior Contributor surfgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    06 Nov 09
    Location
    MD
    Posts
    1,609

  4. #19
    Contributor
    Join Date
    14 Apr 09
    Posts
    716
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN19913U

    First paragraph excerpted from the linked news story:

    "Nearly an hour elapsed before a Philippine-flagged container ship reported a collision with a U.S. warship, the Japanese coastguard said on Monday, as investigations began into the accident in which seven U.S. sailors were killed..."
    .
    .
    .

  5. #20
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    05 Sep 06
    Posts
    4,168
    Interesting. That hour roughly puts it to that point where ACX Crystal stopped trundling around after stopping and instead went for the port.

  6. #21
    Senior Contributor blidgepump's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Jul 09
    Posts
    2,558

    perhaps the compass was not working on the Tug?

    Quote Originally Posted by kato View Post
    ... and a tugboat guiding it while it towed them?
    The tug's compass / GPS was not working, also?

  7. #22
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Contrary by Nature.
    zraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Oct 06
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    14,892
    Quote Originally Posted by blidgepump View Post
    The tug's compass / GPS was not working, also?
    Japanese tugboat, may have been language issues

  8. #23
    Senior Contributor blidgepump's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Jul 09
    Posts
    2,558

    and so it begins ......

    Quote Originally Posted by zraver View Post
    Japanese tugboat, may have been language issues
    Language or ????? This begins the inquiry process of "discovery"....

    There was nobody on the bridge of a cargo ship when it struck the USS Fitzgerald on Saturday claims one defense expert, as the US Navy and Japanese authorities clashed over the timing of the fatal accident.

    As the official investigation over who is to blame for the collision which claimed the lives of seven US Navy sailors got off to a shambolic start, an expert with defense industry bible Janes said that the ACX Crystal was likely operating on autopilot and the crew was asleep.

    And while the US Navy faces embarrassing questions over how one of their advanced $1.5bn warships was struck in near perfect visibility, it emerged that American officials are claiming the collision occurred nearly one hour after the Japanese Coast Guard say it did.

    'I suspect, from the data, that the ACX Crystal was running on autopilot the whole time, and nobody was on the bridge. If anyone was on the bridge, they had no idea how to turn off the autopilot,' said Steffan Watkins, an IT security consultant and ship tracking analyst for Janes Intelligence Review, to DailyMail.com.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz4kXtkk19w
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

  9. #24
    Senior Contributor blidgepump's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Jul 09
    Posts
    2,558

    Plot .....

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...itzgerald.html

    Loran never offered this feature....

  10. #25
    Military Professional JCT's Avatar
    Join Date
    07 Apr 05
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    345
    Yeah, it will be interesting to see the causes of this tragedy. The USN is now agreeing that 0130 is roughly the time of the collision. The ACX Crystal started to maneuver radically right after this and then probably looped around to provide assistance (my guess.)

    ArsTechnica has an interesting run down of AIS.

  11. #26
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Defense Professional
    Albany Rifles's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Apr 07
    Location
    Prince George, VA
    Posts
    8,565
    Quote Originally Posted by blidgepump View Post
    I miss Desertwo, ... he was a good friend...
    Ditto
    We must be...increasingly on the alert to prevent them from taking over other mineshaft space, in order to breed more prodigiously than we do, thus, knocking us out in superior numbers when we emerge! Mr. President, we must not allow...a mine shaft gap!
    - General Buck Turgidson

  12. #27
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Defense Professional
    Albany Rifles's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Apr 07
    Location
    Prince George, VA
    Posts
    8,565
    Interesting editorial.

    The author makes several cogent point. However, as I was not a naval officer, I cannot claim for the veracity.

    The one line that struck me was the comment that the USN uses yards for distance as opposed to NM. And that makes perfect sense from a weapons point of view.

    http://gcaptain.com/uss-fitzgerald-fault/

    That said, for The Seven.

    We must be...increasingly on the alert to prevent them from taking over other mineshaft space, in order to breed more prodigiously than we do, thus, knocking us out in superior numbers when we emerge! Mr. President, we must not allow...a mine shaft gap!
    - General Buck Turgidson

  13. #28
    Senior Contributor surfgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    06 Nov 09
    Location
    MD
    Posts
    1,609
    Well if this becomes the public record it will appear that we have a name for a new Destroyer (Gary Rehm).
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/navy-sail...200434952.html

  14. #29
    Senior Contributor surfgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    06 Nov 09
    Location
    MD
    Posts
    1,609
    An update that indicates that a call for help was delayed.
    https://news.usni.org/2017/06/21/inv...l-reached-help

  15. #30
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    13 Nov 07
    Posts
    3,828
    A perspective by a former commander of an Aegis class destroyer

    https://warontherocks.com/2017/06/ho...isions-at-sea/

    From 2004 to 2006 I commanded USS Bulkeley (DDG 84), a ship very much like the Fitzgerald, and during the rest of my 21-year Navy career I spent a good bit of time at sea. I have never been involved in a collision, but I have been in very tight situations which, had my ship or the other not properly responded, could have resulted in one. During my career, on the rare occasions in which Navy ships were involved in collisions, voluminous lessons learned were promulgated. We studied these incidents and incorporated them into our training. In virtually every instance, decisions made by fallible human beings were contributing factors. I hope to add to a common understanding of these factors....

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Tenerife 747 Collision--what if?
    By Tamara in forum World Affairs Board Pub
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 28 Feb 14,, 19:21
  2. USS Porter collision at sea..
    By dundonrl in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 31 Aug 12,, 05:52
  3. Mid-air collision
    By S65 in forum The Iranian Question
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 15 Oct 09,, 13:43
  4. China train collision
    By Deltacamelately in forum International Politics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04 May 08,, 22:12

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •