Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Think Tanks

  1. #1
    A Self Important Senior Contributor troung's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    8,018

    Think Tanks


    Trump could cause the death of think tanks as we know them




    By Josh Rogin Global Opinions

    January 15 


    For decades, Washington think tanks have been holding pens for senior government officials waiting for their next appointments and avenues of influence for sponsors of their research. Donald Trumps incoming administration is bent on breaking that model.

    Trumps appointments have so far have been heavy on business executives and former military leaders. Transition sources tell me the next series of nominations deputy-level officials at top agencies will also largely come from business rather than the think tank or policy communities. For example, neither the American Enterprise Institutes John Bolton nor the Council on Foreign Relations Richard Haass is likely to be chosen for deputy secretary of state, while hedge fund manager David McCormick is on the shortlist. Philip Bilden, a private equity investment firm executive with no government experience, is expected to be named secretary of the Navy.


    The president-elect favors people who have been successful in the private sector and amassed personal wealth over those who have achieved prominence in academic or policy fields. Those close to him, including chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon and senior adviser Jared Kushner, see think tanks as part of a Washington culture that has failed to implement good governance, while becoming beholden to donors.


    This is the death of think tanks as we know them in D.C., one transition official told me. The people around Trump view think tanks as for sale for the highest bidder. They have empowered whole other centers of gravity for staffing this administration.

    Leaders of major think tanks dont agree the situation is so dire. But each is working hard to figure out its stance and strategy for the next four years. Those who focus on the nuts and bolts of governing could be useful to a Trump administration that has little understanding of or experience in managing much less changing government.


    The reason why the Trump people find think tanks less useful is, they are doing an acquisition, they are taking over a business, and when they ask people, Tell me how this business runs, most people dont know, said James Carafano, vice president for foreign and defense policy studies at the Heritage Foundation.




    Many Heritage staffers, including Carafano, are involved in the transition, but not many have gone into the administration. If Trump ends up shutting out think tanks, many will maintain influence by focusing more on serving Capitol Hill, industry and foreign entities.

    There are lots of customers for think tanks that are beyond the West Wing and the Oval Office, Carafano said.

    Other leading conservative think tanks are planning to play the long game. AEI, for example, has many scholars who signed letters opposing Trump during the GOP primaries and so might not be well-represented inside the administration. Moreover, Trumps plans on foreign policy are contrary to what the conservative think tank has long stood for.

    Danielle Pletka, AEIs senior vice president for foreign and defense policy studies, said the think tanks that will succeed are those that stick to their ideals and allow independent scholars to pursue independent research regardless of the administrations positions.

    Its not a game. Washington has always been and will always be an open marketplace for ideas, she said. I have no doubt that we will have a great working relationship with the Trump administration insofar as we have good ideas, and Im sure we will disagree with them at times.

    There will be links between major D.C. think tanks and senior Trump officials. Secretary of state nominee Rex Tillerson is a longtime trustee of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. The defense secretary nominee, retired Gen.  James N. Mattis, is affiliated with the Hoover Institution. National security adviser-designate Michael T. Flynn, a retired lieutenant general, has been meeting with think tank leaders throughout the transition.


    For left-leaning think tanks, the calculation is easier. Theres a lot of demand and money for organizations to oppose Trumps policies. Think tanks of all stripes are adapting, said Vikram Singh, vice president for national security and international policy at the Center for American Progress. The choice is between defending the advances of the post-World War II era that are potentially now under assault, or trying to influence the Trump team to do what you think the country needs.




    If the Trump team succeeds in diminishing the influence of Washington think tanks and keeping their scholars out of government, policymaking will suffer. Many of these scholars hold the institutional knowledge and deep subject matter expertise the incoming administration needs. Trump should see them as an asset in the marketplace of ideas, not a liability.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.6a09162fe351
    To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway

  2. #2
    Turbanator Senior Contributor Double Edge's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Sep 10
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    5,850
    The president-elect favors people who have been successful in the private sector and amassed personal wealth over those who have achieved prominence in academic or policy fields. Those close to him, including chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon and senior adviser Jared Kushner, see think tanks as part of a Washington culture that has failed to implement good governance, while becoming beholden to donors.
    They are not the only ones. So what will these people do, are they out of a job or do they have to sing for their next meal.

    Leaders of major think tanks don’t agree the situation is so dire. But each is working hard to figure out its stance and strategy for the next four years. Those who focus on the nuts and bolts of governing could be useful to a Trump administration that has little understanding of or experience in managing — much less changing — government.
    exactly

  3. #3
    Contributor
    Join Date
    14 Jul 10
    Posts
    387
    This is the death of think tanks as we know them in D.C., one transition official told me. The people around Trump view think tanks as for sale for the highest bidder. They have empowered whole other centers of gravity for staffing this administration.
    This is not a false statement for a lot of think tanks.
    Combined with that there are a lot of think tanks wedded to an ideology like the RAND coorporation and think tanks that are partisan.

    Yet for some reason I suspect that the ones that deliver a consistent good quality have little to fear.
    The ones that are shite however.....

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Light Tanks
    By JA Boomer in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 120
    Last Post: 13 Sep 11,, 00:48
  2. 3ID gets new Abrams tanks
    By HKDan in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 15 Apr 11,, 02:14
  3. Tanks in Moscow!
    By Aryol in forum International Economy
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 26 May 08,, 21:07
  4. who gets the new t-34 tanks ?
    By bugs in forum The World Wars
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08 Apr 08,, 20:27
  5. French tanks obstruct Israeli tanks over suspected Hizballah robbery
    By Srirangan in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 30 Sep 06,, 18:57

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •