drhuy,
the party doesn't pour money into a campaign they -expect- to win. the party pours money into campaigns they -hope- to win.
IE Dems aren't spending big in Hawaii because they know they're gonna win it without trying.
hey, if you think shrinking GOP margins of victory aren't a problem, then more power to you...:-)
here is what i said:
this should have been a foregone conclusion from the start.
don't think Dems anywhere were "too sure" they were going to win a ruby-red state. they had GOOD REASON to hope that they would win, but as far as i know -no one- was saying that this was going to be a slam-dunk for the Dems.
yeah, no kidding it's a disappointment for Dems that they didn't win after spending a lot of time, energy, and money in the district...but that doesn't mean the GOP is doing great and have nothing to fear, either.
its not about how, its about why, unless you think dems are too stupid to pour money into a campaign that they didnt expect to win.
IE Dems aren't spending big in Hawaii because they know they're gonna win it without trying.
if the trend-line is that relevant, hillary would have won thanks to the "purple" states. Really, how many times have dems talk about flipping red states, instead they kept losing over the last 8 years or more.
"foregone conclusion" bwahhahah then why dems called it "referendum on trump" if they were sure they would lose?
this should have been a foregone conclusion from the start.
don't think Dems anywhere were "too sure" they were going to win a ruby-red state. they had GOOD REASON to hope that they would win, but as far as i know -no one- was saying that this was going to be a slam-dunk for the Dems.
yeah, no kidding it's a disappointment for Dems that they didn't win after spending a lot of time, energy, and money in the district...but that doesn't mean the GOP is doing great and have nothing to fear, either.
Comment