Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Iran: Let Us Rid the World of Wahhabism

  1. #1
    A Self Important Senior Contributor troung's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03

    Iran: Let Us Rid the World of Wahhabism

    Mohammad Javad Zarif: Let Us Rid the World of Wahhabism


    Credit Oliver Munday

    Tehran — Public relations firms with no qualms about taking tainted petrodollars are experiencing a bonanza. Their latest project has been to persuade us that the Nusra Front, Al Qaeda’s affiliate in Syria, is no more. As a Nusra spokesman told CNN, the rebranded rebel group, supposedly separated from its parent terrorist organization, has become “moderate.”

    Thus is fanaticism from the Dark Ages sold as a bright vision for the 21st century. The problem for the P.R. firms’ wealthy, often Saudi, clients, who have lavishly funded Nusra, is that the evidence of their ruinous policies can’t be photoshopped out of existence. If anyone had any doubt, the recent video images of other “moderates” beheading a 12-year-old boy were a horrifying reality check.

    Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, militant Wahhabism has undergone a series of face-lifts, but underneath, the ideology remains the same — whether it’s the Taliban, the various incarnations of Al Qaeda or the so-called Islamic State, which is neither Islamic nor a state. But the millions of people faced with the Nusra Front’s tyranny are not buying the fiction of this disaffiliation. Past experience of such attempts at whitewashing points to the real aim: to enable the covert flow of petrodollars to extremist groups in Syria to become overt, and even to lure Western governments into supporting these “moderates.” The fact that Nusra still dominates the rebel alliance in Aleppo flouts the public relations message.

    Saudi Arabia’s effort to persuade its Western patrons to back its shortsighted tactics is based on the false premise that plunging the Arab world into further chaos will somehow damage Iran. The fanciful notions that regional instability will help to “contain” Iran, and that supposed rivalries between Sunni and Shiite Muslims are fueling conflicts, are contradicted by the reality that the worst bloodshed in the region is caused by Wahhabists fighting fellow Arabs and murdering fellow Sunnis.

    While these extremists, with the backing of their wealthy sponsors, have targeted Christians, Jews, Yazidis, Shiites and other “heretics,” it is their fellow Sunni Arabs who have been most beleaguered by this exported doctrine of hate. Indeed, it is not the supposed ancient sectarian conflict between Sunnis and Shiites but the contest between Wahhabism and mainstream Islam that will have the most profound consequences for the region and beyond.

    While the 2003 American-led invasion of Iraq set in motion the fighting we see today, the key driver of violence has been this extremist ideology promoted by Saudi Arabia — even if it was invisible to Western eyes until the tragedy of 9/11.

    The princes in Riyadh, the Saudi capital, have been desperate to revive the regional status quo of the days of Saddam Hussein’s rule in Iraq, when a surrogate repressive despot, eliciting wealth and material support from fellow Arabs and a gullible West, countered the so-called Iranian threat. There is only one problem: Mr. Hussein is long dead, and the clock cannot be turned back.

    The sooner Saudi Arabia’s rulers come to terms with this, the better for all. The new realities in our region can accommodate even Riyadh, should the Saudis choose to change their ways.

    What would change mean? Over the past three decades, Riyadh has spent tens of billions of dollars exporting Wahhabism through thousands of mosques and madrasas across the world. From Asia to Africa, from Europe to the Americas, this theological perversion has wrought havoc. As one former extremist in Kosovo told The Times, “The Saudis completely changed Islam here with their money.”

    Though it has attracted only a minute proportion of Muslims, Wahhabism has been devastating in its impact. Virtually every terrorist group abusing the name of Islam — from Al Qaeda and its offshoots in Syria to Boko Haram in Nigeria — has been inspired by this death cult.

    So far, the Saudis have succeeded in inducing their allies to go along with their folly, whether in Syria or Yemen, by playing the “Iran card.” That will surely change, as the realization grows that Riyadh’s persistent sponsorship of extremism repudiates its claim to be a force for stability.

    The world cannot afford to sit by and witness Wahhabists targeting not only Christians, Jews and Shiites but also Sunnis. With a large section of the Middle East in turmoil, there is a grave danger that the few remaining pockets of stability will be undermined by this clash of Wahhabism and mainstream Sunni Islam.

    There needs to be coordinated action at the United Nations to cut off the funding for ideologies of hate and extremism, and a willingness from the international community to investigate the channels that supply the cash and the arms. In 2013, Iran’s president, Hassan Rouhani, proposed an initiative called World Against Violent Extremism, or WAVE. The United Nations should build on that framework to foster greater dialogue between religions and sects to counter this dangerous medieval fanaticism.

    The attacks in Nice, Paris and Brussels should convince the West that the toxic threat of Wahhabism cannot be ignored. After a year of almost weekly tragic news, the international community needs to do more than express outrage, sorrow and condolences; concrete action against extremism is needed.

    Though much of the violence committed in the name of Islam can be traced to Wahhabism, I by no means suggest that Saudi Arabia cannot be part of the solution. Quite the reverse: We invite Saudi rulers to put aside the rhetoric of blame and fear, and join hands with the rest of the community of nations to eliminate the scourge of terrorism and violence that threatens us all.

    Mohammad Javad Zarif is the foreign minister of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
    To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway

  2. #2
    Lei Feng Protege
    Defense Professional
    Join Date
    23 Aug 05
    Arlington, VA
    sounds like a great plan, too bad i can't hear the details over Hezbollah laughing their arse off.
    There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."- Isaac Asimov

  3. #3
    New Member
    Join Date
    29 Jan 15
    Well, it's no surprise that we have the Foreign Minister of the Islamic Republic of Iran taking the opportunity to bash the Saudis and Wahhabism, both of which are opposed to predominantly Shia Iran. Yeah, they are involved in some nasty business, with the blessing and guidance of Western powers, of course. The thing is, the KSA is a loyal client of the US and of great strategic importance in terms of its oil reserves. Compare that with Iran, which is a thorn in the side of the West, and has been for many years; Iran was somewhat problematic even before the Islamic Revolution of 1979. For the US, Iran in its current form will never be a real partner, despite numerous claims that it is possible. It's just not going to happen. It didn't even happen under Obama after he pushed the nuclear deal. That's unfortunate, because it means more conflict and probably another major war.

  4. #4
    Dirty Kiwi Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    10 Nov 04
    Te Whanganui a-Tara, Te Ika a Maui, Aotearoa
    And the "no no, we're actually nice" campaign gains speed.
    In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.


  5. #5
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    05 Sep 06
    Timing's important, since there's currently a retrial in the EU regarding Hamas' status as a terrorist organization. The ECJ decided in 2014 that for formal reasons they should be removed from the list, the EU declined. That's now in trial again since September.

    It's also looking interesting for Hamas too because a similar trial about LTTE just ended in the ECJ deciding that the precise political-legal status of an organization and the location of its struggle is largely irrelevant to being on the terror list.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. An interesting article and a report of Islamic Wahhabism in America
    By SirteII in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09 Oct 10,, 20:22
  2. Ahmadinajad Calls Iran Number One World Power
    By Walking Dead in forum International Economy
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01 Mar 08,, 19:13
  3. Bar Iran’s President From Attending World Cup In Germany
    By Lunatock in forum International Economy
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 26 Apr 06,, 20:16
  4. Wahhabism rejects Al Qaeda violence, says Saudi envoy
    By Ray in forum International Politics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 17 Apr 06,, 18:57
  5. Iran to world: We can handle an invasion
    By Bill in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 12 Apr 06,, 00:59

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts