Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: glaciers have genders

  1. #1
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    23,775

    glaciers have genders

    Feds Spent $412,930 Studying ‘Relationship Between Gender and Glaciers’

    Glaciers can shape ‘religious beliefs and cultural values’

    BY: Elizabeth Harrington
    March 7, 2016 4:00 pm

    The National Science Foundation has spent more than $400,000 on a study that published scientific results on the “relationship between gender and glaciers.”

    The paper “Glaciers, gender, and science,” published in January 2016, concluded that “ice is not just ice,” urging scientists to take a “feminist political ecology and feminist postcolonial” approach when they study melting ice caps and climate change.

    “Glaciers are key icons of climate change and global environmental change,” the paper by Mark Carey, a professor at the University of Oregon, explained. “However, the relationships among gender, science, and glaciers–particularly related to epistemological questions about the production of glaciological knowledge – remain understudied.”

    “Merging feminist postcolonial science studies and feminist political ecology, the feminist glaciology framework generates robust analysis of gender, power, and epistemologies in dynamic social-ecological systems, thereby leading to more just and equitable science and human-ice interactions,” the paper said.

    The 10,417-word article published in Sage Journals’ “Progress in Human Geography,” was first highlighted by Reason’s Robby Soave and Tablet Magazine’s Yair Rosenberg.

    The paper argues that glaciers can shape “religious beliefs and cultural values,” and that climate change can lead to the “breakdown of stereotypical gender roles and even ‘gender renegotiation.’”

    While the paper argues that glacier research needs more feminine perspectives, gender is not defined as male and female for the researchers, but “as a range of personal and social possibilities.”

    “A critical but overlooked aspect of the human dimensions of glaciers and global change research is the relationship between gender and glaciers,” the paper said. “While there has been relatively little research on gender and global environmental change in general there is even less from a feminist perspective that focuses on gender (understood here not as a male/female binary, but as a range of personal and social possibilities) and also on power, justice, inequality, and knowledge production in the context of ice, glacier change, and glaciology.”

    The National Science Foundation funded the study as part of a project that initially set out to “examine the early development and subsequent evolution of the five main aspects of glaciology.”

    The study has cost taxpayers $412,930.

    Carey added gender to the glacier study after he hired a University of Oregon student who found “women’s voices are rarely heard in glacier-related research,” according to the school.

    “I wanted to know more about the relationship between women and ice, so we pursued the topic from climate-change vulnerability to knowledge,” said the student, Jaclyn Rushing, an environmental studies and romance languages major.

    “Jaclyn found a report that noted how women are more vulnerable to glacier changes and hazards than are men,” Carey said. “I had never researched these gendered vulnerabilities.”

    Carey ended up looking at glaciers through the “lens of feminist studies.”

    The question “Why feminist glaciology?” presented by the paper is answered by an argument that scientific research of glaciers has been “dominated by men and masculinity.”

    One purpose of “feminist glaciology” is to “analyze how power, domination, colonialism, and control—undergirded by and coincident with masculinist ideologies—have shaped glacier-related sciences and knowledges over time.”

    “Most existing glaciological research–and hence discourse and discussions about cryospheric change–stems from information produced by men, about men, with manly characteristics, and within masculinist discourses,” the paper said.

    When studying the gender aspects of ice, one cannot leave out the patriarchy, the paper adds.

    “The feminist lens is crucial given the historical marginalization of women, the importance of gender in glacier-related knowledges, and the ways in which systems of colonialism, imperialism, and patriarchy co-constituted gendered science,” the paper said.

    Sage Journals filed the paper under “feminist glaciology,” “feminist political ecology,” and “feminist postcolonial science studies.”
    http://freebeacon.com/issues/feds-sp...nder-glaciers/

    Original article: http://phg.sagepub.com/content/early...515623368.long

    Who'd knew....glaciers have genders and can affect feminist awareness across the globe.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  2. #2
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    08 Dec 05
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,692
    Saw that yesterday. This was my favorite quote...

    “Merging feminist postcolonial science studies and feminist political ecology, the feminist glaciology framework generates robust analysis of gender, power, and epistemologies in dynamic social-ecological systems, thereby leading to more just and equitable science and human-ice interactions,” the paper said.
    WTF does that even mean?

    What's next, postcolonial feminist mathematics? Does 2+2 become something different if calculated by a feminist?

  3. #3
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    23,775
    I don't know how anyone can come up with that with a straight face and draw a salary/grant without feeling guilty of committing grand theft.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  4. #4
    Dirty Kiwi Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    10 Nov 04
    Location
    Wellington, Te Ika a Maui, Aotearoa
    Posts
    19,744
    Quote Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
    I don't know how anyone can come up with that with a straight face and draw a salary/grant without feeling guilty of committing grand theft.
    It's written to rub your face in it. $100,000 a piece fpr contemporarily composed gibberish, they're all laughing as they write it.
    In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility

    Gottfried Leibniz

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •