Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 61 to 62 of 62

Thread: British army (maybe) getting a new MBT?

  1. #61
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    05 Sep 08
    Posts
    1,744
    The problem is that the EU doesn't have a "defense budget". I realise folks in this forum are not like this, but many in the US seem to forget that Europe is a continent, not a country, and what that means. It's a group of countries, each with it's economy, politics, etc. Which means each has to pay for it's armed forces out of what can be a very small budget. My own country, for example, could barelly aford a single 2nd-hand tank batalion (Leopard 2), for our single brigade...

    And even the richer northern countries are feeling the pinch on costs. And replacing old gear isn't helping. The Netherlands is replacing 80+ F-16s with less than 40 F-35s! If this relatively rich country can't aford more, what about the others?...

  2. #62
    Senior Contributor Monash's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Mar 10
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,419
    The EU and Britain could afford a very effective defense force given the collective size of the member state economies. The problem is getting them to surrender national sovereignty as it pertains to defense force planning and procurement. The political and military elites of all member States each want control their own separate and independent armed forces, equipped along lines they choose and trained for missions they regard as a priority. All of them equipped with their chosen weapon and support systems and each with its own independent military ethos and training priorities. Yes there are some big ticket items like the Eurofighter where several nations have come together (because the cold hard reality of paying for them as individual states has hit them in the face) but apart from that its just way to hard to overcome the politics and bureaucratic inertia preventing any such system. (Imagine what the US defense forces would look like if all the state governments in the US had to collectively agree on the size and structure of defense spending every year).

    So in a perfect world Europe could afford a centralized defense acquisition system that selected and purchased everything from uniforms to major strategic weapons systems based on the budget allocation it received from its member states together with centralized military planning agency run by senior officers of the major states. Here in the real world - good luck getting something like that up and running in the next few decades.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Australian army or the British army? which one?
    By 1947 in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 99
    Last Post: 12 Feb 13,, 16:25
  2. Afghanistan: how the US army battled it out with the British
    By troung in forum Operation Enduring Freedom and Af-Pak
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 07 Jul 12,, 21:29
  3. British Army 700 new armoured vehicles
    By VarSity in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 24 Sep 09,, 17:35
  4. Yon gets down with the British Army.
    By Bluesman in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10 Dec 07,, 14:23
  5. British Army unveils new Trojan tank
    By Boltonian in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 15 Feb 07,, 10:02

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •