Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eye for an eye: Iran blinds acid attacker

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Eye for an eye: Iran blinds acid attacker

    Human rights... barbaric sentence... I am not losing sleep over this...

    Eye for an eye: Iran blinds acid attacker

    Medics gouge out man’s eye in first known case where retribution ruling has been carried out, amid condemnation from human rights groups


    Thursday 5 March 2015 11.30 EST Last modified on Thursday 5 March 2015 19.06 EST
    Eye for an eye: Iran blinds acid attacker | World news | The Guardian

    In a literal application of the sharia law of an eye for an eye, an Iranian man convicted of blinding another man in an acid attack has been blinded in one eye, marking the first time Iran has carried out such a punishment.

    The convicted acid attacker, who has not been identified, was rendered unconscious in Rajai-Shahr prison in the city of Karaj on Tuesday as medics gouged out his left eye, according to the state-owned Hamshahri newspaper.

    Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, from Iran Human Rights (IHR), an independent NGO based in Norway, condemned the blinding as barbaric. “Medical staff who cooperate with the Iranian authorities in this act have broken the Hippocratic oath and cannot call themselves doctors,” he said.

    The man had been found guilty of throwing acid in the face of his unnamed victim five years ago in the city of Qom, blinding and disfiguring him for life. He was subsequently sentenced to be blinded in both eyes, paying a fine and 10 years imprisonment.
    Advertisement

    Although the convict was sentenced to lose sight in both eyes on Tuesday, the victim – who, under Iranian law, has the final say in the punishment – decided at the last minute to postpone the blinding of his right eye for six months. The attacker will be able to plead with the plaintiff to spare him from being blinded fully.

    Acid attacks have been rife in Iran in recent years, usually driven by family feuds. Hamshahri reported that the man in this case had been hired by the relatives of his victim’s wife to take revenge on their behalf. It was not clear if he had carried out the attack for financial gain or whether he was related to the wife’s family.

    Iranian officials, worried about the increase in the rate of acid attacks, have endorsed retribution, but human rights activists condemn it as inhumane.

    Islam’s Sharia law allows for qisas (retribution) but it also advises clemency. Under Iranian law, victims or their families have the final say in such cases and can halt the punishment at any time.

    Other acid attackers have also been sentenced to be blinded in Iran, but this is the first known case where the punishment has been carried out. In most previous cases doctors had refused to cooperate with the officials.

    Raha Bahreini, a researcher with Amnesty International’s Iran team, said that punishing someone by deliberately blinding them is “an unspeakably cruel and shocking act”.

    She told the Guardian: “Blinding is totally prohibited under international law, along with stoning, flogging, amputation and other forms of corporal punishment provided in Iran’s Islamic penal code and must not be carried out under any circumstances.”
    Advertisement

    Instead of meting out such macabre punishments, Bahreini said Iranian authorities “should raise awareness about violence including root causes, ensure that perpetrators of acid attacks are punished with appropriate and proportionate penalties consistent with international human rights norms, and survivors are provided with effective remedies, including compensation and psychosocial and medical rehabilitation.”

    Another man, identified only as Hamid, was also scheduled to be blinded in Karaj on Tuesday, but his punishment was postponed at the request of his victim, Davoud Roshanaei.

    “Hamid was about to be rendered unconscious on the bed when his father entered the room and asked me for more time,” said Roshanaei, who has been disfigured and lost sight in one eye as the result of the assault. “I gave them two more months to provide me with compensation for my treatment.”

    In a highly publicised case in 2011, Ameneh Bahrami, a victim of an acid attack, received international praise after pardoning her attacker hours before surgeons prepared to blind the man with acid. Bahrami was disfigured and blinded in both eyes because she had repeatedly spurned her attacker’s offer for marriage.

    Last year, a spate of acid attacks on young women in Iran’s top tourist destination, Isfahan, caused national horror and outrage. Activists claimed that unlike other cases across the country, victims in Isfahan had been targeted by hardliners for wearing clothes deemed inappropriate. The authorities have vehemently denied this charge.



    Last edited by troung; 06 Mar 15,, 15:22.
    To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway

  • #2
    Muslims are medieval savages....except when they do something savage & medieval we'd like to do.
    sigpic

    Win nervously lose tragically - Reds C C

    Comment


    • #3
      It's one of those issues the HR groups might have thought about before stepping up for the acid thrower.

      Eye for an eye > a committee investigating root causes of acid throwing and issuing a thousand page report...
      Last edited by troung; 07 Mar 15,, 16:22.
      To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway

      Comment


      • #4
        Interesting that the Iranian Human Rights group is based in Norway, one of the most lenient countries in the world. Their hug-a-thug policies include 20 years max prison sentence no matter what you do - little wonder Anders Brevik surrendered without a fight. After the massacre in Oslo and on Utoya Island the state actually paid a guy to be Brevik's friend and play chess with him.

        I'm all for a fitting sentence, provided there is clear PROOF of guilt. Some take Sharia to the extreme and ask not for eye for an eye, but your life for a baby finger- take the blasphemy witch-hunts in Pakistan and stoning for adultery as example.

        Comment


        • #5
          Ya know, i've yet to find anything about this outside a press release by IHR, the Washington Post article that adapts the press release and the self-inventing news world of British press.

          Comment

          Working...
          X