Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is American or Western foreign policy responsible for the anarchy in Libya

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Sitting Bull View Post
    We now know who is behind the mystery air strikes in Libya. Have the Gulf Arabs replaced the U.S. in the role of kingmaker in the Middle East and North Africa?
    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/26/wo...ikes.html?_r=0
    One can only hope!
    Trust me?
    I'm an economist!

    Comment


    • #32
      Saudi Arabia and the U.A.E. are creeping up on everybody quickly when it comes to regional influence and military spending. The KSA has the fourth highest defense budget in the world in 2014; together with their U.A.E. allies they accounted for about $86 billion in military spending according to Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. To put that in perspective that's almost as much as Russia officially spent, more than India, Turkey and Israel put together and a good chunk of it is spent on aircraft.

      The Gulf Arabs claim to be leading the fight against Islamic extremism yet are leaving ISIS alone the most part, other than busting recruitment centers in their own country. Certainly some of this air power would be welcome against ISIS positions.

      Can they be a difference-maker in Libya? Without co-ordinated ground attacks by anti-Islamists, aerial bombardment will achieve little in the way of influencing the outcome.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by excurmudgeon View Post
        I don't believe there is an answer to this question. "Arab Spring" was misread by the West as a grass roots turn toward democracy.
        Actually there was a lot of commentary by some in the military that people should be more cautious about what was happening
        I certainly remember me stating that there were significant signs that it wasn't a rush for democracy and that it was being managed by other vested interests.

        unfort there's a tendency for talking head academics to spin outcomes and ignore the meaningful data

        and I wasn't the only one on here voicing concerns about excess enthusiasm and a need to temper wishful thinking with the reality of regional politics
        Linkeden:
        http://au.linkedin.com/pub/gary-fairlie/1/28a/2a2
        http://cofda.wordpress.com/

        Comment

        Working...
        X