Originally posted by Blademaster
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Afghanistan, US, China, India and Pakistan - A Genuine Interview
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Officer of Engineers View Post....the Chinese have a choice of not letting the 45 divisions facing them going West ... or risk 187 divsions coming East after the Soviets get through with NATO.
Imo, that would be a congestion kill ..... for the Soviets.sigpicAnd on the sixth day, God created the Field Artillery...
Comment
-
-
Sir,that raises the question why the Soviets did not went after the Chinese ?Nixon may have said no,but he was not going to lob nukes at the behest of the red Chinese?Those who know don't speak
He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. Luke 22:36
Comment
-
Originally posted by Officer of Engineers View PostMajor,
The Soviets would not need 187 divisions. They did it before with 82 divisions against the IJA and the PLA was not that much better than the IJA in the 1970s.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mihais View PostSir,that raises the question why the Soviets did not went after the Chinese ?Nixon may have said no,but he was not going to lob nukes at the behest of the red Chinese?
Originally posted by Blademaster View PostThen how did PLA drive the Americans south in the Korean War? The American army were just as good as the Soviet army.Last edited by Officer of Engineers; 03 Oct 13,, 22:02.
Comment
-
They did. The Americans retook Seoul from the Chinese and drove them back across the 38th. Once there, Ridgway did not overstep his authority to try and retake North Korea.
Also, I would like to clarify that this was the late 1960s, early 1970s. The GPCR had taken a toll on PLA professionalism. The Army that did the 1962 Sino-Indo War was purged out of existence. In its place is an army where the only way you can tell the difference between non-commissioned and officers is the number of pockets. NCMs have two and Officers have 4 supposedly to carry the little red book instead of grenades.
The result was the 1979 1st Sino-VN War.Last edited by Officer of Engineers; 04 Oct 13,, 02:06.
Comment
-
Pakistan's former ambassador to the US Husain Haqqani writes in his book “Magnificent Delusions” about a secret handwritten letter from obama to zardari offering US intervention in kashmir.
'Obama offered to push India on Kashmir for Pak' - Hindustan Times
In his book, spread over 300 pages, Haqqani writes that in November 2009, Jones travelled to Islamabad to hand deliver a letter written by Obama to Zardari.
Dated November 11, 2009, through the letter Obama offered Pakistan to become America's "long-term strategic" partner.
“The letter even hinted at addressing Pakistan's oft-stated desire for a settlement of the Kashmir dispute," he writes.
Islamabad rejected the offer
Comment
-
Originally posted by anil View PostPakistan's former ambassador to the US Husain Haqqani writes in his book “Magnificent Delusions” about a secret handwritten letter from obama to zardari offering US intervention in kashmir.
'Obama offered to push India on Kashmir for Pak' - Hindustan Times
in return for ending support to groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Taliban
Islamabad rejected the offer
BTW, India will never accept TPM.
Comment
-
IMO, I dont think that Obama would have helped fight that war. He may have offered to help conduct negociations to end the conflict but I doubt either fuel it by providing arms or helping fight it. The opposite side to that is that Russia could have helped India. In either case it would have made the conflict even worse for all concerned.Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dreadnought View PostIMO, I dont think that Obama would have helped fight that war. He may have offered to help conduct negociations to end the conflict but I doubt either fuel it by providing arms or helping fight it. The opposite side to that is that Russia could have helped India. In either case it would have made the conflict even worse for all concerned."Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?" ~ Epicurus
Comment
Comment