Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: India’s secret army of Tibetans without parachutes; kickbacks suspected

  1. #1
    Senior Contributor commander's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Aug 10
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    921

    Post India’s secret army of Tibetans without parachutes; kickbacks suspected

    India’s secret force of Tibetans, the SFF (Special Frontier Force), raised after the 1962 border conflict with China, has been without parachutes for nearly two years on the suspicion that senior officers tried to take kickbacks.

    The SFF, sometimes also referred to as Establishment-22, has been a part of India’s external intelligence agency, R&AW, and was originally raised to play a role behind enemy lines in China in the event of a war.

    Raised with the help of the CIA post-1962, it is a Special Forces unit almost the size of an army division and headed by a Major General on deputation. At the time of the procurement it was headed by Major General Dalbir Singh who has subsequently moved on to the North-East on promotion to command an army Corps. Parachutes are essential equipment for the SFF and are critical to the constant training and operations that the SFF undertakes on a regular basis.

    Last year the SFF began the process to procure new parachutes since the ones in stock had either been used for the mandated 100 jumps or had lived their shelf life of 15 years. By May 2011 the tenders were sent out using the usual procedure that R&AW uses to mask its purchases, by using the front of a public sector undertaking that is under a different Union ministry.

    The SFF put in a major criterion to select the parachutes. Any company that was bidding for the tender should have supplied parachutes to its armed forces. They also added another clause mandating that the parachutes must have been used by the military for at least five years to establish a proven track record. The SFF also ensured that the parachutes had to match the aircraft from which they would be deployed. So for any parachutes that were to be used for the Russian IL-76 aircraft, the parachutes had to be from an erstwhile “Warsaw Pact” country.

    This ensured that two companies from Ukraine emerged as the front-runners for a supply of 150 parachutes for one batch, while a Spanish company emerged as the front-runner for a western aircraft that is currently used by the SFFF. Both put together, the initial purchase was to be of 300 parachutes followed by larger orders to equip the whole force. Each parachute costs about Rs1.25 lakh.

    However, once the user trials began, senior officers noticed a major anomaly in the samples sent across by the two Ukranian companies. The samples, sources told DNA, were matching sequentially. “We noticed that if the serial number was 514 in one parachute, the other sample was 515. How was that possible if two separate manufacturers had sent us separate random samples? Even the lettering was the same which meant they were sent from the same manufacturer,” a senior officer from R&AW, familiar with the case, told DNA.

    The anomaly was noticed by one of the senior army officers on deputation to the SFF. According to sources in R&AW, Col Arvind Sharma, a special forces officer who was from the army’s elite 2 Para (Special Forces) had noticed this and immediately put it on record in his report. As soon as he recorded this, the procurement came to a grinding halt. “He was asked on several occasions to either withdraw or change his report but he refused. Sources say he was verbally asked on several occasions to withdraw his report. Finally, he was sent back to the army because he refused to do so,” sources said.

    While Col Sharma was moved out, his report remained on record. Being a paratrooper himself, Col Sharma refused to budge. He felt the parachutes were being pushed through for kickbacks. This could lead to procurement of parachutes of suspect quality because kickbacks were to exchange hands as soon as the deal was signed. With soldiers jumping off at 30,000 ft, this would be a matter of life and death. Sharma also suspected that both companies were probably a single entity which had been shown to be different on paper to avoid a single-bidder scenario.

    But even with Col Sharma out of the way, the SFF couldn’t go ahead with the procurement and it continues to be held in abeyance. No inquiries were constituted and the matter was never investigated by an independent agency like the CBI. With R&AW not being subjected to any external audit by the CAG or any oversight, the issue was given a quiet burial while the SFF continues to operate without parachutes.
    Source: India’s secret army of Tibetans without parachutes; kickbacks suspected

    I just came across this on the internet. How credible is this claim ??? If it is to be believed , then how much effective can this 'SFF' be ???

    Also I am sick of all these corruption within the Military

  2. #2
    Liberté, Unité, Egalité Senior Contributor Tronic's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Dec 04
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    3,997
    Quote Originally Posted by commander View Post
    How credible is this claim ??? If it is to be believed , then how much effective can this 'SFF' be ???
    Which claim?

    About the existence of SFF or the alleged kickbacks?

    If the former, than the SFF as an organization may be shrouded in secrecy, but its roles in previous Indian conflicts is not. For a basic understanding of the force, wiki is a good start: Special Frontier Force - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    If the latter, than we just have to wait and watch for heads to roll.
    Cow is the only animal that not only inhales oxygen, but also exhales it.
    -Rekha Arya, Former Minister of Animal Husbandry

  3. #3
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    14 Mar 08
    Posts
    2,053
    Couldn't they just get parachutes from whomever the rest of the Indian Army sources their parachutes? Or does the SFF have different operational requirements?

  4. #4
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,980
    w.r.t to the existence of SFF, make one wonder there is lack of trust between China and India.
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

  5. #5
    Senior Contributor commander's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Aug 10
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    921
    Quote Originally Posted by xinhui View Post
    w.r.t to the existence of SFF, make one wonder there is lack of trust between China and India.
    Right ... So how do you explain what China does in the border every now and then or what it does WITHIN our borders or even in the open sea... I get you.. India is the only cause why there is STILL tension between the two nations.. India can never be trusted by China /sarcasm

  6. #6
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,980
    take an easy there. just pointing out that Chinese do have their own views. While India's view has been well-discussed in the net, Chinese POV (maybe due to language skill) not so much.

    Listen bro, pointing finger will get you no where.
    Last edited by xinhui; 14 Mar 12, at 17:56.
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

  7. #7
    Turbanator Senior Contributor Double Edge's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Sep 10
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    10,415
    In 1975 a new rule pertaining to the SFF was issued, this prohibited the SFF from being deployed to within 10 km of the Indo-Chinese border unless under explicit instructions.
    With warming of Indo-Chinese relations, SFF has moved out of covert operations to various other fields like counter-terrorism.
    Focus has changed

  8. #8
    Senior Contributor commander's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Aug 10
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    921
    Quote Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
    Which claim?

    About the existence of SFF or the alleged kickbacks?

    If the former, than the SFF as an organization may be shrouded in secrecy, but its roles in previous Indian conflicts is not. For a basic understanding of the force, wiki is a good start: Special Frontier Force - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    If the latter, than we just have to wait and watch for heads to roll.
    Sorry I didn't make it clear ...The existence of SFF ..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. US officials say Army soldier suspected of shooting more than a dozen Afghans
    By troung in forum Operation Enduring Freedom and Af-Pak
    Replies: 108
    Last Post: 25 Mar 12,, 18:40
  2. India capable of US-like operation: Army chief
    By troung in forum Central and South Asia
    Replies: 95
    Last Post: 25 May 11,, 19:30
  3. India's secret undersea weapon
    By Sardaukar in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 25 Apr 08,, 16:06
  4. India to train Afghan army
    By Tronic in forum Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 16 Apr 08,, 21:01
  5. Chinese guards 'kill Tibetans'
    By Jay in forum International Politics
    Replies: 126
    Last Post: 26 Jan 07,, 11:25

Tags for this Thread

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •