Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 102

Thread: 2021: The New Europe

  1. #1
    Senior Contributor Doktor's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Aug 08
    Location
    Skopje, Macedonia
    Posts
    13,668

    2021: The New Europe

    Niall Ferguson peers into Europe's future and sees Greek gardeners, German sunbathers—and a new fiscal union. Welcome to the other United States.

    Welcome to Europe, 2021. Ten years have elapsed since the great crisis of 2010-11, which claimed the scalps of no fewer than 10 governments, including Spain and France. Some things have stayed the same, but a lot has changed.

    The euro is still circulating, though banknotes are now seldom seen. (Indeed, the ease of electronic payments now makes some people wonder why creating a single European currency ever seemed worth the effort.) But Brussels has been abandoned as Europe's political headquarters. Vienna has been a great success.

    "There is something about the Habsburg legacy," explains the dynamic new Austrian Chancellor Marsha Radetzky. "It just seems to make multinational politics so much more fun."

    The Germans also like the new arrangements. "For some reason, we never felt very welcome in Belgium," recalls German Chancellor Reinhold Siegfried von Gotha-Dämmerung.

    Life is still far from easy in the peripheral states of the United States of Europe (as the euro zone is now known). Unemployment in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain has soared to 20%. But the creation of a new system of fiscal federalism in 2012 has ensured a steady stream of funds from the north European core.

    Like East Germans before them, South Europeans have grown accustomed to this trade-off. With a fifth of their region's population over 65 and a fifth unemployed, people have time to enjoy the good things in life. And there are plenty of euros to be made in this gray economy, working as maids or gardeners for the Germans, all of whom now have their second homes in the sunny south.

    The U.S.E. has actually gained some members. Lithuania and Latvia stuck to their plan of joining the euro, following the example of their neighbor Estonia. Poland, under the dynamic leadership of former Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski, did the same. These new countries are the poster children of the new Europe, attracting German investment with their flat taxes and relatively low wages.

    But other countries have left.

    David Cameron—now beginning his fourth term as British prime minister—thanks his lucky stars that, reluctantly yielding to pressure from the Euroskeptics in his own party, he decided to risk a referendum on EU membership. His Liberal Democrat coalition partners committed political suicide by joining Labour's disastrous "Yeah to Europe" campaign.

    Egged on by the pugnacious London tabloids, the public voted to leave by a margin of 59% to 41%, and then handed the Tories an absolute majority in the House of Commons. Freed from the red tape of Brussels, England is now the favored destination of Chinese foreign direct investment in Europe. And rich Chinese love their Chelsea apartments, not to mention their splendid Scottish shooting estates.

    In some ways this federal Europe would gladden the hearts of the founding fathers of European integration. At its heart is the Franco-German partnership launched by Jean Monnet and Robert Schuman in the 1950s. But the U.S.E. of 2021 is a very different thing from the European Union that fell apart in 2011.

    * * *
    It was fitting that the disintegration of the EU should be centered on the two great cradles of Western civilization, Athens and Rome. But George Papandreou and Silvio Berlusconi were by no means the first European leaders to fall victim to what might be called the curse of the euro.

    Since financial fear had started to spread through the euro zone in June 2010, no fewer than seven other governments had fallen: in the Netherlands, Slovakia, Belgium, Ireland, Finland, Portugal and Slovenia. The fact that nine governments fell in less than 18 months—with another soon to follow—was in itself remarkable.

    But not only had the euro become a government-killing machine. It was also fostering a new generation of populist movements, like the Dutch Party for Freedom and the True Finns. Belgium was on the verge of splitting in two. The very structures of European politics were breaking down.

    Who would be next? The answer was obvious. After the election of Nov. 20, 2011, the Spanish prime minister, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, stepped down. His defeat was such a foregone conclusion that he had decided the previous April not to bother seeking re-election.

    And after him? The next leader in the crosshairs was the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, who was up for re-election the following April.

    The question on everyone's minds back in November 2011 was whether Europe's monetary union—so painstakingly created in the 1990s—was about to collapse. Many pundits thought so. Indeed, New York University's influential Nouriel Roubini argued that not only Greece but also Italy would have to leave—or be kicked out of—the euro zone.

    But if that had happened, it is hard to see how the single currency could have survived. The speculators would immediately have turned their attention to the banks in the next weakest link (probably Spain). Meanwhile, the departing countries would have found themselves even worse off than before. Overnight all of their banks and half of their nonfinancial corporations would have been rendered insolvent, with euro-denominated liabilities but drachma or lira assets.

    Restoring the old currencies also would have been ruinously expensive at a time of already chronic deficits. New borrowing would have been impossible to finance other than by printing money. These countries would quickly have found themselves in an inflationary tailspin that would have negated any benefits of devaluation.

    For all these reasons, I never seriously expected the euro zone to break up. To my mind, it seemed much more likely that the currency would survive—but that the European Union would disintegrate. After all, there was no legal mechanism for a country like Greece to leave the monetary union. But under the Lisbon Treaty's special article 50, a member state could leave the EU. And that is precisely what the British did.

    * * *
    Britain got lucky. Accidentally, because of a personal feud between Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, the United Kingdom didn't join the euro zone after Labour came to power in 1997. As a result, the U.K. was spared what would have been an economic calamity when the financial crisis struck.

    With a fiscal position little better than most of the Mediterranean countries' and a far larger banking system than in any other European economy, Britain with the euro would have been Ireland to the power of eight. Instead, the Bank of England was able to pursue an aggressively expansionary policy. Zero rates, quantitative easing and devaluation greatly mitigated the pain and allowed the "Iron Chancellor" George Osborne to get ahead of the bond markets with pre-emptive austerity. A better advertisement for the benefits of national autonomy would have been hard to devise.

    At the beginning of David Cameron's premiership in 2010, there had been fears that the United Kingdom might break up. But the financial crisis put the Scots off independence; small countries had fared abysmally. And in 2013, in a historical twist only a few die-hard Ulster Unionists had dreamt possible, the Republic of Ireland's voters opted to exchange the austerity of the U.S.E. for the prosperity of the U.K. Postsectarian Irishmen celebrated their citizenship in a Reunited Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland with the slogan: "Better Brits Than Brussels."

    Another thing no one had anticipated in 2011 was developments in Scandinavia. Inspired by the True Finns in Helsinki, the Swedes and Danes—who had never joined the euro—refused to accept the German proposal for a "transfer union" to bail out Southern Europe. When the energy-rich Norwegians suggested a five-country Norse League, bringing in Iceland, too, the proposal struck a chord.

    The new arrangements are not especially popular in Germany, admittedly. But unlike in other countries, from the Netherlands to Hungary, any kind of populist politics continues to be verboten in Germany. The attempt to launch a "True Germans" party (Die wahren Deutschen) fizzled out amid the usual charges of neo-Nazism.

    The defeat of Angela Merkel's coalition in 2013 came as no surprise following the German banking crisis of the previous year. Taxpayers were up in arms about Ms. Merkel's decision to bail out Deutsche Bank, despite the fact that Deutsche's loans to the ill-fated European Financial Stability Fund had been made at her government's behest. The German public was simply fed up with bailing out bankers. "Occupy Frankfurt" won.

    Yet the opposition Social Democrats essentially pursued the same policies as before, only with more pro-European conviction. It was the SPD that pushed through the treaty revision that created the European Finance Funding Office (fondly referred to in the British press as "EffOff"), effectively a European Treasury Department to be based in Vienna.

    It was the SPD that positively welcomed the departure of the awkward Brits and Scandinavians, persuading the remaining 21 countries to join Germany in a new federal United States of Europe under the Treaty of Potsdam in 2014. With the accession of the six remaining former Yugoslav states—Bosnia, Croatia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia—total membership in the U.S.E. rose to 28, one more than in the precrisis EU. With the separation of Flanders and Wallonia, the total rose to 29.

    Crucially, too, it was the SPD that whitewashed the actions of Mario Draghi, the Italian banker who had become president of the European Central Bank in early November 2011. Mr. Draghi went far beyond his mandate in the massive indirect buying of Italian and Spanish bonds that so dramatically ended the bond-market crisis just weeks after he took office. In effect, he turned the ECB into a lender of last resort for governments.

    But Mr. Draghi's brand of quantitative easing had the great merit of working. Expanding the ECB balance sheet put a floor under asset prices and restored confidence in the entire European financial system, much as had happened in the U.S. in 2009. As Mr. Draghi said in an interview in December 2011, "The euro could only be saved by printing it."

    So the European monetary union did not fall apart, despite the dire predictions of the pundits in late 2011. On the contrary, in 2021 the euro is being used by more countries than before the crisis.

    As accession talks begin with Ukraine, German officials talk excitedly about a future Treaty of Yalta, dividing Eastern Europe anew into Russian and European spheres of influence. One source close to Chancellor Gotha-Dämmerung joked last week: "We don't mind the Russians having the pipelines, so long as we get to keep the Black Sea beaches."

    ***
    On reflection, it was perhaps just as well that the euro was saved. A complete disintegration of the euro zone, with all the monetary chaos that it would have entailed, might have had some nasty unintended consequences. It was easy to forget, amid the febrile machinations that ousted Messrs. Papandreou and Berlusconi, that even more dramatic events were unfolding on the other side of the Mediterranean.

    Back then, in 2011, there were still those who believed that North Africa and the Middle East were entering a bright new era of democracy. But from the vantage point of 2021, such optimism seems almost incomprehensible.

    The events of 2012 shook not just Europe but the whole world. The Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear facilities threw a lit match into the powder keg of the "Arab Spring." Iran counterattacked through its allies in Gaza and Lebanon.

    Having failed to veto the Israeli action, the U.S. once again sat in the back seat, offering minimal assistance and trying vainly to keep the Straits of Hormuz open without firing a shot in anger. (When the entire crew of an American battleship was captured and held hostage by Iran's Revolutionary Guards, President Obama's slim chance of re-election evaporated.)

    Turkey seized the moment to take the Iranian side, while at the same time repudiating Atatürk's separation of the Turkish state from Islam. Emboldened by election victory, the Muslim Brotherhood seized the reins of power in Egypt, repudiating its country's peace treaty with Israel. The king of Jordan had little option but to follow suit. The Saudis seethed but could hardly be seen to back Israel, devoutly though they wished to avoid a nuclear Iran.

    Israel was entirely isolated. The U.S. was otherwise engaged as President Mitt Romney focused on his Bain Capital-style "restructuring" of the federal government's balance sheet.

    It was in the nick of time that the United States of Europe intervened to prevent the scenario that Germans in particular dreaded: a desperate Israeli resort to nuclear arms. Speaking from the U.S.E. Foreign Ministry's handsome new headquarters in the Ringstrasse, the European President Karl von Habsburg explained on Al Jazeera: "First, we were worried about the effect of another oil price hike on our beloved euro. But above all we were afraid of having radioactive fallout on our favorite resorts."

    Looking back on the previous 10 years, Mr. von Habsburg—still known to close associates by his royal title of Archduke Karl of Austria—could justly feel proud. Not only had the euro survived. Somehow, just a century after his grandfather's deposition, the Habsburg Empire had reconstituted itself as the United States of Europe.

    Small wonder the British and the Scandinavians preferred to call it the Wholly German Empire.

    —Mr. Ferguson is a professor of history at Harvard University and the author of "Civilization: The West and the Rest," published this month by Penguin Press

    Niall Ferguson on 2021: The New Europe - WSJ.com
    No such thing as a good tax - Churchill

    To make mistakes is human. To blame someone else for your mistake, is strategic.

  2. #2
    Senior Contributor Mihais's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Apr 08
    Location
    Transylvania
    Posts
    5,117
    There ominous signs for this USE.A Chancellor named Gotha-Dämmerung.Come-on...
    Those who know don't speak
    He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. Luke 22:36

  3. #3
    Senior Contributor Doktor's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Aug 08
    Location
    Skopje, Macedonia
    Posts
    13,668
    You gonna kill me. From laughing.

    Seriously considering the written IDK if to laugh or to cry. But, since it is WSJ and prominent Harvard professor wrote it... I'll stick to crying.
    Last edited by Doktor; 22 Nov 11, at 13:00.
    No such thing as a good tax - Churchill

    To make mistakes is human. To blame someone else for your mistake, is strategic.

  4. #4
    Senior Contributor Mihais's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Apr 08
    Location
    Transylvania
    Posts
    5,117
    I noticed also a fascination with the Habsburg Empire among some westerners.Not saying it wasn't cool,like all empires of the past.It was even viable,up until 1848.But as a geopolitical construction it was dinosaur after that.Hated by everyone not German or Hungarian.
    What can I say.Great model for USE.Fits it well.

    I begin to think Niall Ferguson wanted to write a satire.
    Those who know don't speak
    He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. Luke 22:36

  5. #5
    Senior Contributor Doktor's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Aug 08
    Location
    Skopje, Macedonia
    Posts
    13,668
    He is a historian, so he thinks this cycle will come again

    Only this time we wont be under Turks
    No such thing as a good tax - Churchill

    To make mistakes is human. To blame someone else for your mistake, is strategic.

  6. #6
    Senior Contributor Mihais's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Apr 08
    Location
    Transylvania
    Posts
    5,117
    We never were.

    I also believe in cycles.I also pay attention to detail.First,nobody talks of the Chinese bubble bursting.I've the feeling they won't have time to do what Russian magnates did 10 years ago and invest in London.They're next in line to be kicked.
    Second,there's the assumption that returning to the ole currencies will be somehow more expensive.There will be austerity of sorts whether the EZ survives or not.That will keep inflation down.But there will be also the opportunity to become productive.
    Third,there's the assumption that Spaniards,Italians,Greeks etc... will accept willingly to be led by Germans.The Germans may be cool and I'm a big fan of the Germans of the old,but I wouldn't enjoy being led by them,nor anybody else.Our ''leaders'' suck big time.But we can vote them out or kill them and put something better in place.Just we're masochists right now.
    Fourth there's the assumption that Germany will be willing to lead.There may be plenty of real estate in the South,but I somehow doubt its incentive enough.
    Fifth there's the assumption that Germany is isolated and immune to turmoil and has the resources to throw money happily left and right.Germany is viable now because it still exports.Germany can of course come out of the crisis much better than anybody else.But to say Germany isn't full of debt that somehow will not affect them doesn't make too much sense.

    Since you talked of Turks.Second Vienna,Lepanto,Nicopolis,etc... saw a good chunk of Europe ganging up on them.Unlike then now we have all defense mechanisms in place.We don't need much else.
    Those who know don't speak
    He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. Luke 22:36

  7. #7
    Señor Contributor Senior Contributor BD1's Avatar
    Join Date
    30 Nov 06
    Location
    estonia
    Posts
    2,836
    you noticed Gotha-Dammerung yet missed Marha Radetzky ? Mihais, what was your grade in military history?

    well that was fun read, so thanks Dok. this is full of win
    If i only was so smart yesterday as my wife is today

    Minding your own biz is great virtue, but situation awareness saves lives - Dok

  8. #8
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    19 Feb 06
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    1,527
    I kinda got fooled by the title a little bit.

    Perhaps we are in the money centric view of the world just like a century ago we were in a nationalistic centric view of the world and before that it was more of an ethnic state and before that religious and before that tribal.

    Seeking direct control over people seems to have gone by the wayside.

    Maybe in the future we will try to control peoples' minds or thoughts instead of actions through monetary incentives. Sort of jumping from plane to plane with the ultimate goal being layered over and over by time.
    Originally from Sochi, Russia.

  9. #9
    Senior Contributor Mihais's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Apr 08
    Location
    Transylvania
    Posts
    5,117
    Quote Originally Posted by BD1 View Post
    you noticed Gotha-Dammerung yet missed Marha Radetzky ? Mihais, what was your grade in military history?

    well that was fun read, so thanks Dok. this is full of win
    I didn't missed ,just ignored him/her.

    My grades will remain shrouded in secrecy,so anyone can take a guess based on what I write.
    Those who know don't speak
    He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. Luke 22:36

  10. #10
    Contributor NUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    29 Aug 08
    Posts
    581
    Quote Originally Posted by Mihais View Post
    The Germans may be cool and I'm a big fan of the Germans of the old,but I wouldn't enjoy being led by them,nor anybody else.
    This is fine, but, as i see situation in Europe, in 10 years it will be Fourth Reich or bloody chaos. Though i agree, chaos is much more probable.


    Maybe in the future we will try to control peoples' minds or thoughts
    It's called mass media. 50 years old news.
    Winter is coming.

  11. #11
    Senior Contributor Doktor's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Aug 08
    Location
    Skopje, Macedonia
    Posts
    13,668
    Quote Originally Posted by Mihais View Post
    We never were.
    Well, we were :(

    I also believe in cycles.I also pay attention to detail.First,nobody talks of the Chinese bubble bursting.I've the feeling they won't have time to do what Russian magnates did 10 years ago and invest in London.They're next in line to be kicked.
    Yep I believe in circles, too. Bucharest is not in good colective memory over here.
    Whose turn? Russian, Chinese or Brits?

    Second,there's the assumption that returning to the ole currencies will be somehow more expensive.There will be austerity of sorts whether the EZ survives or not.That will keep inflation down.But there will be also the opportunity to become productive.
    Saving on governmental level could slow the growth. How it will increase productivity?

    Third,there's the assumption that Spaniards,Italians,Greeks etc... will accept willingly to be led by Germans.The Germans may be cool and I'm a big fan of the Germans of the old,but I wouldn't enjoy being led by them,nor anybody else.Our ''leaders'' suck big time.But we can vote them out or kill them and put something better in place.Just we're masochists right now.
    At least it will be more transparent and 'ours' wont have to go to Berlin for directions, but ze Germans will come here to tell us what to do.
    Hey, maybe we can't vote them, but sure we can shoot them. Heck, we shoot the Serbian King in France

    Fourth there's the assumption that Germany will be willing to lead.There may be plenty of real estate in the South,but I somehow doubt its incentive enough.
    They will see no other option and will help us

    Fifth there's the assumption that Germany is isolated and immune to turmoil and has the resources to throw money happily left and right.Germany is viable now because it still exports.Germany can of course come out of the crisis much better than anybody else.But to say Germany isn't full of debt that somehow will not affect them doesn't make too much sense.
    They had worse periods in current history and came out twice, so this wont be a biggie for them.

    Since you talked of Turks.Second Vienna,Lepanto,Nicopolis,etc... saw a good chunk of Europe ganging up on them.Unlike then now we have all defense mechanisms in place.We don't need much else.
    A Turkish friend told me "Berlin is the biggest Turkish city outside Turkey". Think about it.
    No such thing as a good tax - Churchill

    To make mistakes is human. To blame someone else for your mistake, is strategic.

  12. #12
    Senior Contributor Mihais's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Apr 08
    Location
    Transylvania
    Posts
    5,117
    Quote Originally Posted by Doktor View Post

    Yep I believe in circles, too. Bucharest is not in good colective memory over here.
    WTH have they done to you?I can understand us not to like the place.We send all our idiots there.But what is your problem?
    Actually I'm a bit serious in this matter.

    Quote Originally Posted by Doktor View Post
    Saving on governmental level could slow the growth. How it will increase productivity?
    Hmm,work more,waste less.

    Quote Originally Posted by Doktor View Post
    At least it will be more transparent and 'ours' wont have to go to Berlin for directions, but ze Germans will come here to tell us what to do.
    Hey, maybe we can't vote them, but sure we can shoot them. Heck, we shoot the Serbian King in France
    You know damn well it won't fly.We'll cheat the faraway bastards until they'll turn pauper.Then we'll shoot them.

    Quote Originally Posted by Doktor View Post
    A Turkish friend told me "Berlin is the biggest Turkish city outside Turkey". Think about it.
    I know the saying.Every big western city is like that.Once there was a sea between opponents.Now is a street .I'll abstain from further comments about the consequences of combining this with a declining standard of living.
    Those who know don't speak
    He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. Luke 22:36

  13. #13
    Senior Contributor Doktor's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Aug 08
    Location
    Skopje, Macedonia
    Posts
    13,668
    Quote Originally Posted by Mihais View Post
    WTH have they done to you?I can understand us not to like the place.We send all our idiots there.But what is your problem?
    Actually I'm a bit serious in this matter.
    Twice the idiots from all over the world gathered there and it didn't end well for us

    Hmm,work more,waste less.
    But that will leave the mob without jobs. We don't want that!

    You know damn well it won't fly.We'll cheat the faraway bastards until they'll turn pauper.Then we'll shoot them.
    Sounds like a plan.

    I know the saying.Every big western city is like that.Once there was a sea between opponents.Now is a street .I'll abstain from further comments about the consequences of combining this with a declining standard of living.
    We have enough of our own, to be clear I don't mean Turks, but our own breed, so we don't need outsiders. Heck even Chinese don't come here
    No such thing as a good tax - Churchill

    To make mistakes is human. To blame someone else for your mistake, is strategic.

  14. #14
    Turbanator Senior Contributor Double Edge's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Sep 10
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    7,355
    Entertaining article DoK, reinforces my view that the euro isn't going away anytime soon.

  15. #15
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    14 Mar 08
    Posts
    2,011
    Quote Originally Posted by Mihais View Post
    We never were.

    I also believe in cycles.I also pay attention to detail.First,nobody talks of the Chinese bubble bursting.I've the feeling they won't have time to do what Russian magnates did 10 years ago and invest in London.They're next in line to be kicked.
    The Chinese bubble isn't going to burst on that level. Though why London of all places?!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Europe's Economies
    By Merlin in forum International Economy
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04 Sep 09,, 20:17
  2. Only in europe and the uk .
    By tankie in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10 Jun 09,, 14:05
  3. UK is No.1 in Europe
    By PubFather in forum International Politics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 14 Oct 06,, 22:35
  4. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 24 Apr 06,, 18:00
  5. could the US ever see war in europe again? if so where?
    By beantown05 in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 11 Apr 05,, 21:58

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •