Originally posted by Double Edge
View Post
I am not interested in lookin at the "broader point" in this case because this is not a "genuine case".The foolish person in question has done everything to bring trouble upon her and then cry about "free speech". it is nothing more than self serving refuge.
you share a platform with islamists .Talk about democracy . endorse sedition. this is just lack of basic commonsense.
if you want to waste your time defending foolish people, its your prerogative.
to me , this is not a credible case of free speech infringement.
its more a case of arrogant megalomaniac with a gift for perennial stupidity, bringing yet another trouble on HERSELF.
Bingo! when WHAT Is said is considered a threat we are already losing. These are danger signs to me because stopping one from speaking amounts to stopping everyone
you and nandy are wasting your time for the wrong person with hyperbole.
i would be interested in debating the topic on a case that has merit.this case does not have any merit,.
Comment