Page 234 of 234 FirstFirst ... 225226227228229230231232233234
Results 3,496 to 3,498 of 3498

Thread: Destroyers - Fletcher Class

  1. #3496
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Defense Professional
    Albany Rifles's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Apr 07
    Location
    Prince George, VA
    Posts
    8,552
    Quote Originally Posted by Shinytop View Post
    Boy am I glad I was in the Army!
    Ever been in a Bradley Fighting Vehicle in MOPP 4 in the Mojave in August?

    ;-)
    We must be...increasingly on the alert to prevent them from taking over other mineshaft space, in order to breed more prodigiously than we do, thus, knocking us out in superior numbers when we emerge! Mr. President, we must not allow...a mine shaft gap!
    - General Buck Turgidson

  2. #3497
    Regular
    Join Date
    11 May 14
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    39
    Quote Originally Posted by FlankDestroyer View Post
    I was on a Sumner Class that did the conversion in 1969 during a yard availability. We did this fuel swap in concert with adding probe refueling (instead of pigtail in a trunk). Maybe that is a quick way to discern if the Fletchers had the conversion? I suspect there were very few if any 445s that got the fuel change as I outlined earlier. The money went to the Sumner/Gearing Class conversions as they had a longer shelf life.

    Basically do you want to spend the money if you are going to decommission in the near term? Probably not!

    Beyond the soot, one of the prime advantages of the fuel was Boiler Technician (BT) retention as the workload and nature of the work changed somewhat with the reduced maintenance requirements. As a side note we lost some range with the fuel conversion and obviously more refining is more expensive.
    Thank you FlankDestroyer! I forgot all about the probe change out, which would need to be accomplished by a repair facility due to the piping mods. And of course the BT Retention! More time on liberty less time doing watersides and fireside! Didn’t BUPERS do away with or substantially reduce the BT reinlistment bonus as well during that time?

  3. #3498
    Regular
    Join Date
    11 May 14
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    39
    Quote Originally Posted by blidgepump View Post
    and some more pictures...
    The good, the pretty & the robbed...
    Great photos! Lots of memories!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Modernized Iowa Class versus Essex WWII Carrier Class
    By talshiar in forum Battleships Board
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 05 Feb 18,, 22:46
  2. WWII Destroyers
    By Master Chief in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 23 Feb 13,, 00:29
  3. Iowa Class vs Kirov Class
    By eocoolj in forum Battleships Board
    Replies: 224
    Last Post: 12 Jun 08,, 00:02
  4. What Should the Next Gen Destroyers....
    By Tibbetts in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 13 Jan 06,, 18:23
  5. Kidd Class vs Sovremmeney Class
    By BUFF in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 98
    Last Post: 03 Jan 05,, 04:42

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •