Hey, I just conceded that I don't know anything about this subject; why can't you just take your rhetorical victory?
Oh, wait; I was being sarcastic. You do realize, I hope, that I do not, have not, and will not concede to you that the only thing we can possibly do to stop Iran's weapons program to be an invasion of their territory, and a seizing of their capital. Because if THAT is what you think, then 1) you're not equipped to even offer an opinion on this question, and 2) you're not really equipped to use the keyboard you typed it out on.
C'mon, fellas. The whole point, ALWAYS, has been that Iran need not be destroyed, invaded, nor paid off. None of those three 'plans' is workable. But is there anything in between those to maximalist positions? All-out general war with the object of compelling unconditional surrender of the Iranians, OR a granting that they're just the exact same as us, viz, the right to acquire nucelar weapons?
Oh, wait; I was being sarcastic. You do realize, I hope, that I do not, have not, and will not concede to you that the only thing we can possibly do to stop Iran's weapons program to be an invasion of their territory, and a seizing of their capital. Because if THAT is what you think, then 1) you're not equipped to even offer an opinion on this question, and 2) you're not really equipped to use the keyboard you typed it out on.
C'mon, fellas. The whole point, ALWAYS, has been that Iran need not be destroyed, invaded, nor paid off. None of those three 'plans' is workable. But is there anything in between those to maximalist positions? All-out general war with the object of compelling unconditional surrender of the Iranians, OR a granting that they're just the exact same as us, viz, the right to acquire nucelar weapons?
Comment