Originally posted by calass
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What does PAK FA T 50 mean for India?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Andrey Egorov View Postkuku, thanks. I understand India's position and I'm fully agree with it.
There are articles about the western planes being less expensive in life time costs, more advanced and more effective through better availability (true dream machines), even then the initial cost of acquisition in large numbers is difficult to balance in a poor nations budget.
At the same time with the generation gap in technology(or propaganda) can not be ignored, i think there could be good money for this program, perhaps giving back the costs if proper checks are maintained (unlike previous programs like the many PRC made Mig-21s), even a light fighter based on this program sounds like a good investment, although the funds to do so might be difficult to find.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cdude View PostLike milking the last rupee out of India's hand on every project?
Comment
-
Originally posted by calass View PostThey give India stuff no country in the world will...of course they do not do it with the goodness of their heart and it cost a lot of money but they do know that their knowhow or derived items from that knowhow will never be used against them...
Comment
-
Originally posted by cdude View PostI agree. You can say the same to China/Pakistan or US/Pakistan relationship. But they hardly share any world view as all. I was questioning the previous posters view that Russia and India share the same world view.
And they pretty much share the same world view...tell me one major policy difference they have had in the last few years.Even when the world criticized Russia about Georgia,India kept her mouth pretty much shut.
I was replying to the Russian poster about some in Russia having reservations in transferring sensitive technology to another country with geo-political ambitions.There is no country more harmless to Russia than India..in the near and foreseeable future.Last edited by calass; 20 Mar 10,, 16:17.
Comment
-
Indian FGFA (PAK Fa) will be different, and it will be a further development of the current one. I don't know about "smaller and cheaper" (India is paying 50% of the entire development cost of this bird), India and Russia disagreed on the type of aircraft they both wanted. Russia wanted a single seater air superiority fighter, where India wanted a double seater aircraft with an air-to-ground as a primary role. So the Indian bird will most likely be a further development of this one, and rather than being smaller, it may just be slightly bigger than this one.Cow is the only animal that not only inhales oxygen, but also exhales it.
-Rekha Arya, Former Minister of Animal Husbandry
Comment
-
Originally posted by Skywatcher View PostI've heard a newspaper report cite an unnamed Indian AF or MoD source saying that the Indian PAK-FA would have a RCS of 0.5m2, which frankly sounds ridiculous. If that's true, India might as well just buy the SU-35BM.
The only reliable source that I've heard about the RCS of PAK-FA is from some Russian working in the PAK-FA project. He mention that the goal is to have PAK-FA's rcs as small as a beak of a swallow; I don't know how big a beak is in term of m2Last edited by stealthh; 25 Mar 10,, 03:56.
Comment
-
I dont think this craft is going to be ready as per its plan.. keeping the several hiccups that usaually come along the completion of a fully functional AC. Secondly i have not heard any development currently being progressed in India though the word is out. HAL insisted on having the development front to be done here as well (propabably some percentage of the work), however there is no news that i have come across the same like issues, completion, testing etc...
could anybody provide some insight..
Comment
Comment