Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

50,000 Sons of Iraq now in government jobs?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 50,000 Sons of Iraq now in government jobs?

    Does this square with what's known from people on the ground?

    Print Story: 50,000 former fighters now in Iraqi state jobs - Yahoo! News

    50,000 former fighters now in Iraqi state jobs
    By ADAM SCHRECK, Associated Press Writer Adam Schreck, Associated Press Writer 11 mins ago

    BAGHDAD – Nearly 50,000 Sunni fighters who sided with American forces against al-Qaida and other militants in Iraq are now in government jobs, a top official said Tuesday in an attempt to soothe fears they would be neglected by the country's Shiite leaders.

    The announcement, made during a press conference at a U.S. military base in the heart of Baghdad's heavily fortified Green Zone, was a reminder that Iraq's sectarian tensions remain raw and risk being stoked further as parliamentary elections approach in a matter of weeks.

    Many of the former Sunni fighters, part of a group known as the Sons of Iraq, were themselves former insurgents who switched sides, helping to stabilize the country. The U.S. has been urging Iraq's Shiite-led government to find jobs for the fighters to promote national unity and maintain security as American troops begin to leave the country.

    Mohammed Salman al-Saadi, chairman of Iraq's Implementation and Follow-up Committee for National Reconciliation, said Iraq hopes to put the rest of the estimated 96,000 Sons of Iraq in government jobs by summer.

    The positions are being filled even though no new state jobs were created for other Iraqis last year because of budget problems, he said.

    "This is a major indication of the seriousness the Iraqi government places on the Sons of Iraq," he said.

    In the run-up to the key March elections, Sunni Arabs are accusing the Shiite-dominated government of trying to further marginalize it.

    An announcement by the city council of the mostly Shiite southern city of Najaf on Monday that all Saddam-aligned members of the Baath Party — the Sunni-dominated former ruling party — would be expelled from the province in a day has apparently not yet been implemented, but it has caused disquiet.

    Media around the Arab world highlighted the decision, hinting it could be applied to Sunnis in general.

    Hundreds of Sunni politicians have also been disqualified by a government committee from running in elections because of earlier ties to the Baath party.

    There were no indications Tuesday that the threat to expel Baathists from Najaf was being carried out, however. The ultimatum was seen as a response to a rare series of deadly bomb attacks that rocked the city last week.

    The issue of how to absorb the Awakening fighters is an even more sensitive one because of fears some could become the foot soldiers of any new Sunni insurgency.

    Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's Shiite-led government, under heavy U.S. pressure, has reluctantly agreed to absorb 20 percent of the fighters — organized into what are known as Awakening Councils — into the government's security forces. Al-Saadi said that process is now nearly complete.

    About 10,000 of the fighters in Baghdad have been integrated into the Ministry of Interior's security forces. Of the 40,000 other Sons of Iraq members in the capital, about 30,000 have already been transferred to various government ministries, he said.

    In provinces outside Baghdad, close to one-fifth of the fighters also have been assigned to security services, al-Saadi said. Providing jobs for the remaining 80 percent, however, won't happen until after parliamentary elections in March.

    The U.S. began handing over control in 2008 of the Awakening Councils to Iraq, which pays their roughly $300 monthly salaries.

    Since then, many Sons of Iraq have complained about missing paychecks — prompting accusations among some Sunnis that the government is not serious about integration efforts.

    Al-Saadi acknowledged there had been payment problems, but he blamed the difficulties on technical snags.

    "It wasn't a political decision," he said, adding that he was certain salaries are now being paid.

    Elsewhere in Iraq, a police official in Salahuddin province said that four al-Qaida operatives escaped in a jailbreak from a police station in the town of Yathrib, about 50 miles (80 kilometers) north of Baghdad early Tuesday.

    The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to release information to the media, said two of the escaped convicts had been sentenced to death over sectarian killings in the area.

    Police officers in Yathrib police station confirmed the jailbreak.

    The officials said the four prisoners escaped through the ventilation system, and that police forces are now searching for them in nearby farms and orchards.

    In another attack, a Katyusha rocket landed close to Baghdad's green zone, though no casualties were reported, according to a police officer who spoke on condition of anonymity.

    He said Iraqi soldiers who were near the place where the rocket was believed to have been fired raided the area and arrested three people who were moving in an open field with a small rocket launcher with them.

    The U.S. military said it was investigating the incident but had no further details.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Sameer N. Yacoub contributed to this report.

  • #2
    Iraq To Re-hire 20,000 Former Army Officers

    The NYT is reporting that Iraq intends to re-hire upwards of 20,000 former military officers beginning immediately. With elections just days away, is it fair to ask about the genuinity of this announcement? I think so-

    Iraq To Re-Hire 20,000 Former Hussein-Era Officers-NYT Feb. 26, 2010
    "This aggression will not stand, man!" Jeff Lebowski
    "The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool." Lester Bangs

    Comment


    • #3
      Well it was the US that put Iraqs Baathists into power in the first place .... whats the problem ?

      Comment


      • #4
        Black Prince Reply

        "Well it was the US that put Iraqs Baathists into power in the first place .... whats the problem ?"

        Support your comments.
        "This aggression will not stand, man!" Jeff Lebowski
        "The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool." Lester Bangs

        Comment


        • #5
          OK ...no problem. Memories seem selectively short when it suits the US agenda so heres a reminder

          Another very good example of a CIA-organized regime change was a coup in 1963 that employed political assassination, mass imprisonment, torture and murder. This was the military coup that first brought Saddam Hussein's beloved Ba'ath Party to power in Iraq. At the time, Richard Helms was Director for Plans at the CIA. That is the top CIA position responsible for covert actions, like organizing coups. Helms served in that capacity until 1966, when he was made Director.

          In the quotations collected below, the name of the leader who was assassinated is spelled variously as Qasim, Qassim and Kassem. But, however you spell his name, when he took power in a popularly-backed coup in 1958, he certainly got recognized in Washington. He carried out such anti-American and anti-corporatist policies as starting the process of nationalizing foreign oil companies in Iraq, withdrawing Iraq from the US-initiated right-wing Baghdad Pact (which included another military-run, US-puppet state, i.e., Pakistan) and decriminalizing the Iraqi Communist Party. Despite these actions, and more likely because of them, he was Iraq's most popular leader. He had to go!

          In 1959, there was a failed assassination attempt on Qasim. The failed assassin was none other than a young Saddam Hussein. In 1963, a CIA-organized coup did successfully assassinate Qasim and Saddam's Ba'ath Party came to power for the first time. Saddam returned from exile in Egypt and took up the key post as head of Iraq's secret service. The CIA then provided the new pliant, Iraqi regime with the names of thousands of communists, and other leftist activists and organizers. Thousands of these supporters of Qasim and his policies were soon dead in a rampage of mass murder carried out by the CIA's close friends in Iraq.

          Regime Change: How the CIA put Saddam's Party in Power

          Saddam was always YOUR man until he suddenly became Satan incarnate overnight by not doing as he was told and invading your other client state Kuwait. Interestingly you had no qualms at all about supporting his attack on his other neighbour Iran in 1980 even selling him nerve agents which he used to great effect after 1983 against Iranian mass attacks and dissaffected minorities within his own borders

          It didnt then matter that he was an SOB as long as he was YOUR SOB ... right ?
          Last edited by Black Prince; 28 Feb 10,, 20:46.

          Comment


          • #6
            Black Prince Reply

            "Well it was the US that put Iraqs Baathists into power in the first place ...."

            Maybe. Single-sourcing without quotes may seem disingenous scribe-work but, avoiding that pedanticism for now, doesn't assure the accuracy of Sander's conclusion. What follows, though, is more important-your conclusion.

            Assuming that you are accurate in assessing America's single-handed engineering of a baathist rise to Iraqi power, you've failed to connect the past to the present. In effect, you've de-railed the thread without understanding the complaint-

            "whats the problem ?"

            The problem isn't the Iraqi government's intention to elevate 20,000 former military officers back into the army (whether all dyed-in-the-wool baathists or otherwise unlike your presumptions) as you presume from your above question.

            It's instead a question/problem of whether offering re-integration of these former officers is truly the GoI's intent, to what degree, and whether this may be a disingenuous ploy of the shia-dominated regime to quell anti-election resistance directed from the sunni constituencies.

            That's central to the thread regardless of your now-exposed political predilections. It appears missed altogether by you in your haste to divert this topic off into neo-liberal back-biting about the distant past at the expense of the very near present.

            Please leave quote-marks in the future when cutting and pasting. It makes easier, among other things, separating the dissemblance of one writer from another.

            Thanks.:)
            "This aggression will not stand, man!" Jeff Lebowski
            "The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool." Lester Bangs

            Comment


            • #7
              I believe in calling hypocracy for what it is S 2 and that has little to do with my politics frankly.

              There would have probably been no such thing as Baathists to worry about were it not for US interference in Iraqi poltics in the first place was the point I was making ;).

              Comment


              • #8
                Black Prince Reply

                "I believe in calling hypocracy for what it is S 2 and that has little to do with my politics frankly."

                I believe the word you desire is "hypocrisy". Your point is unproven regardless of how you characterize it. Further, it's irrelevant to the thread here. Your obligation, if driven to reply to this post in the manner thus far, is to do so in your own thread on the topic.

                "There would have probably been no such thing as Baathists to worry about..."

                It is your presumption that all these former officers are baathists. Possibly but unproven. For those that might have been baathists, how committed they'd have been is also a separate issue and neither concern speaks to the intent of the thread.

                What these former officers almost certainly would be are sunnis. The issue to be drawn from the NYT article questions the earnestness surrounding the GoI's offer. You've not answered that.

                "...were it not for US interference in Iraqi poltics in the first place was the point I was making."

                Irrelevant to the topic at hand. The present condition is the reality which faces Iraqi elections and this thread. We'll see if you can discern the difference between the past as you see it and the present as it is.

                Thanks.
                "This aggression will not stand, man!" Jeff Lebowski
                "The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool." Lester Bangs

                Comment

                Working...
                X