What's the best form of government as demonstrated by history?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Best Form of Government?
Collapse
X
-
Hobbes, referring back to Gibbons, cites the "three happy emperors" in Rome, I think. That would be Trajan, Hadrian and Marcus Aurelius. I should add that Hobbes is speaking more theoretically, not practically.
Still, if you think about it, a benevolent dictator would be the best form of govt. because he would get things done -- and it would be "good" things. If you want a modern example, consider Turkey under Ataturk.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Countezero View PostHobbes, referring back to Gibbons, cites the "three happy emperors" in Rome, I think. That would be Trajan, Hadrian and Marcus Aurelius. I should add that Hobbes is speaking more theoretically, not practically.
Still, if you think about it, a benevolent dictator would be the best form of govt. because he would get things done -- and it would be "good" things. If you want a modern example, consider Turkey under Ataturk."Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves, therefore, are its only safe depositories." Thomas Jefferson
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shamus View PostSheesh...here I thought you were talking about Hobbes the stuffed tiger from "Calvin and Hobbes".....just sounded like something he would say;).
I can't stop seeing:
Sunday Funnies:
TRAJAN & HOBBES
mmphph.
Praugh
& the content.
hack, gurble, mmmph
Comment
-
Originally posted by Prof View PostShamus:
I can't stop seeing:
Sunday Funnies:
TRAJAN & HOBBES
mmphph.
Praugh
& the content.
hack, gurble, mmmph
"Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves, therefore, are its only safe depositories." Thomas Jefferson
Comment
-
Originally posted by Countezero View PostHobbes, referring back to Gibbons, cites the "three happy emperors" in Rome, I think. That would be Trajan, Hadrian and Marcus Aurelius. I should add that Hobbes is speaking more theoretically, not practically.
Still, if you think about it, a benevolent dictator would be the best form of govt. because he would get things done -- and it would be "good" things. If you want a modern example, consider Turkey under Ataturk.
If thats the best dorm of government why are people abandoning that way of government?
Comment
-
Originally posted by scotsboyuk View PostWhat's the best form of government as demonstrated by history?
Comment
-
Originally posted by 7thsfsniper View PostRegardless of history, its one that minds its own business and interferes minimally in peoples lives. Alot like what our founding fathers envisioned, not the bastard we have today. IMO, things started sliding about 1860 and have been headed for hell ever since.:(
The Body Politic
Comment
-
7th,
IMO, things started sliding about 1860 and have been headed for hell ever since
it took US government power to change social norms across the US, for the better.
also, re: what our founding fathers envisioned, if you read their writings carefully...
what they were all in favor of was a white, agrarian, protestant america, with representatives elected by the educated elite of society (thus the land-owning requirements for voting). these representatives were to be the super-elite (Founding Father John Dickinson said the Senate should be like the British House of Lords), as the ideal politician of the time was thought to be landed gentlemen-farmers (whom farmed for FUN, as he was supposed to be Old Money). most of them were for Congressional deliberations to be done in secret.
as for what they voraciously disagreed upon, one prominent Founding Father (Alexander Hamilton and his supporters) wanted to abolish states altogether under a centralized government with a senate that served for life. extreme members of his wing actually wanted some sort of elected constitutional monarchy, where the "president" would serve for life, as well.
others wanted to keep the loose Articles of Confederation; what resulted in the end was a compromise that actually tilted more towards Hamilton.
one thing i am disappointed about in US education is the tendency to "deify" the Founding Fathers. most people have NO idea what they stood for, or whom they were. it often comes as a surprise when they find out-- highly intelligent men, for the most part, but very much a product of their times.There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."- Isaac Asimov
Comment
-
speaking from a political scientist perspective, there IS no such thing as a best form of government-- ideal forms change depending on the culture, population size, territory, timeframe, a million other factors.
for a relatively small group of individuals, a dictatorship is often the best (replicated in militaries, for instance).
for a city-state, a benevolent dictatorship could very well outperform a democratic system on a consistent basis. for a medium-sized country, things start breaking down for the same dictatorship due to complexity.
for large countries, representative democracy seems to be the best method, but nations actually tend to evolve there as a result of economic growth. we have actually seen very little data that decisively solves this chicken-and-egg question.There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."- Isaac Asimov
Comment
Comment