Page 86 of 86 FirstFirst ... 77787980818283848586
Results 1,276 to 1,277 of 1277

Thread: Littoral Combat Ships

  1. #1276
    Regular thebard's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Jul 17
    Columbus OH
    Quote Originally Posted by ghost792 View Post
    Seems like the perfect mission for LCS.
    Those Zumwalts would make some really cool looking targets too.

  2. #1277
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    14 Apr 09
    Here’s how much the US Navy saves by cutting the first 4 LCS more than a decade early

    by David B. Larter
    05 March 2020
    Defense News

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Navy’s top requirements officer said in testimony Wednesday that other budget priorities have crowded out the first four littoral combat ships, leaving them on the cutting-room floor in 2021.

    In total, the service saved about $1.8 billion over five years with the move, said Vice Adm. James Kilby, the deputy chief of naval operations for war-fighting requirements and capabilities.

    “As we looked at our budget for [fiscal 2021], we looked at how much it would cost in the FYDP [Future Years Defense Program] collectively — $1.2 billion — and how much it would cost collectively to upgrade those first models — $600 million total — and we determined that money could be applied in other areas,” Kilby told the House Armed Service’s Committee’s Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee. “We didn’t want to do it.”

    Kilby said the service prioritized the Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine and readiness above maintaining older force structure.

    During the Navy’s budget rollout in February, the service’s budget director, Rear Adm. Randy Crites, told reporters that the ships were unique and not like the other LCS in the fleet, making them special cases in the LCS class. They had previously been designated test ships for crewing models and the long-delayed mission packages.

    The hulls — Freedom, Independence, Fort Worth and Coronado — have accrued between six and 12 years of service, but their usefulness as test vessels is waning and they’re no longer worth a deeper financial investment, according to Crites.

    “Those four test ships were instrumental to wringing out the crewing, the maintenance and all the other things we needed to learn from them,” Crites told reporters during the Feb. 10 budget rollout. “But they’re not configured like the other LCS in the fleet, and they need significant upgrades. Everything from combat [systems] to structural, you name it. They’re expensive to upgrade.”

    Still, Kilby said, the Navy is committed to the class, adding that they were necessary to ease the burden on the fleet’s beleaguered destroyers.

    “I think there is great capability in the LCS class,” Kilby said. “And we need those ships in the future to have a mix to allow those ships to do what they are designed to do.

    “When I deployed in 2017 as a strike group commander, I used a destroyer to do maritime fisheries enforcement. That’s not a great use for a DDG [destroyer]. That’s a good use for an LCS.”



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Australia ’s Hazard(ous) Frigate Upgrade
    By xinhui in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 27 Nov 08,, 22:41
  2. Stealth ships for the Swedish Navy
    By 101st Airborne in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 21 Mar 07,, 06:22
  3. Royal Navy ASW, MW,careers, etc
    By rickusn in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04 Dec 06,, 20:12
  4. New Rules for New Enemies
    By Shek in forum The Field Mess
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12 Nov 06,, 00:01
  5. 2003 CONOPS chp 8-9 & appendix's
    By Defcon 6 in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07 Jul 06,, 03:38

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts