Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!
The World Affairs Board is the premier forum for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include military and defense developments, international terrorism, insurgency & COIN doctrine, international security and policing, weapons proliferation, and military technological development.
Our membership includes many from military, defense, academic, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
New Yorker Cover: Clever Satire or ‘Tasteless and Offensive’?
Susan Davis reports on the presidential race.
The July 21 cover of the New Yorker cover depicts a turban-wearing Barack Obama fist-bumping his Afro-headed, machine gun toting wife Michelle as they stand in the Oval Office, with a portrait of Osama bin Laden above the fireplace with an American flag burning inside.
NewYorkerGet it?
The satirical cover harpooning the stereotypes and more insidious accusations against the expected Democratic nominee hasn’t prompted any laughs from the Obama campaign, which a spokesman called “tasteless and offensive,” an opinion seconded by John McCain’s campaign.
(Lost in the discussion is the actual story, “Making it: How Chicago Shaped Obama” which can be read HERE.)
“Obviously I wouldn’t have run a cover just to get attention — I ran the cover because I thought it had something to say. What I think it does is hold up a mirror to the prejudice and dark imaginings about Barack Obama’s — both Obamas’ — past, and their politics,” New Yorker editor David Remnick told the Huffington Post today, “I can’t speak for anyone else’s interpretations, all I can say is that it combines a number of images that have been propagated, not by everyone on the right but by some, about Obama’s supposed ‘lack of patriotism’ or his being ‘soft on terrorism’ or the idiotic notion that somehow Michelle Obama is the second coming of the Weathermen or most violent Black Panthers. That somehow all this is going to come to the Oval Office.”
Remnick continued: “The idea that we would publish a cover saying these things literally, I think, is just not in the vocabulary of what we do and who we are… We’ve run many many satirical political covers. Ask the Bush administration how many.”
The high-brow publication has long been a favorite of sophisticates who presumably would get the joke. Not so much. “I hope the New Yorker sees a drop in subscriptions from this stunt,” wrote a poster on MyDD.com, the liberal blog which opined the view of many on the left that the cover will only serve to spread, not debunk, the Obama rumors.
“So, apparently, it’s ‘satire.’ Trouble is, we can count on the media not to play it that way. They will probably raise a big fuss over it, and the net effect will simply be a further spreading of the rumors the cover is pretending to debunk,’” the site wrote, “Apparently, the satirists at the New Yorker weren’t prescient enough to see that it would play out that way, or didn’t care.”
It's satire, just a joke, you're not supposed to take it literally. If anything, it's insulting the people who go on about "Terrorist fist jabs" and "Obama is a black muslim terrorist"
The only people who will look at this and think otherwise (the same people who talk about fist jabs etc..) are people that would never even vote for Obama in the first place. So it doesn't make a difference whatsoever.
Satire, Joke, Malafide or Mischief, call it what you want, it has a powerful message that will surely affect the mind of the voters,
Masterful in terms of Psyops.
"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."
I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.
Comment