pari,
again, if you follow MY original argument, it is that politically if you want a government that is environmentally-friendly, your sole choice is to go with an administration/EPA that includes the principle of anthropocentric global warming.
because under a Republican administration you get an EPA stuffed with industry lobbyists.
there's no option C, "environmentally friendly administration that doesn't include the principle of anthropocentric global warming."
No, my argument is that subbing religious views for scientific ones invalidates the EPA.
because under a Republican administration you get an EPA stuffed with industry lobbyists.
there's no option C, "environmentally friendly administration that doesn't include the principle of anthropocentric global warming."
Comment