Does congress/USN think about reactivating the Iowa and Wisonsin for supporting this assault, both with their T-hawks, gunfire and mere presence?
*Wont happen, for various reasons both political and economical. As Gun Grape mentioned before you go with what you have not what you wish for and to put any of the BB's back into service would require approximately 12 months for either Missouri and Wisconsin and more needed time for New Jersey and if need be the Iowa but doubtfull. You are comparing 1983-1990's tech with 2000-2010's tech not worth the money and the time unless you are going to do it right and that means painstaking time, effort and funding. In other words they would not be available under the amount of time and not up to USN standards for in theatre operations.
That is not to state they are not worthy, but that they could not meet the military's stringent timeframe.
*Wont happen, for various reasons both political and economical. As Gun Grape mentioned before you go with what you have not what you wish for and to put any of the BB's back into service would require approximately 12 months for either Missouri and Wisconsin and more needed time for New Jersey and if need be the Iowa but doubtfull. You are comparing 1983-1990's tech with 2000-2010's tech not worth the money and the time unless you are going to do it right and that means painstaking time, effort and funding. In other words they would not be available under the amount of time and not up to USN standards for in theatre operations.
That is not to state they are not worthy, but that they could not meet the military's stringent timeframe.
Comment