Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!
The World Affairs Board is the premier forum for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include military and defense developments, international terrorism, insurgency & COIN doctrine, international security and policing, weapons proliferation, and military technological development.
Our membership includes many from military, defense, academic, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
The USN decided around 59-60 to keep the St. Paul (CA 71) in commission and decommission the Des Moines (CA 134).
Ive never quite understood that.
Anybody out there have any info on the decision.
Thanks. Rick
To speculate, the St. Paul CA 73 homeport was moved to Yokosuka in 1959 and ended up being the First Fleet Flagship shortly afterwards. My dad's destroyer homeport was moved to Yokosuka about the same time. We came back in 1962 due to his destroyer's scheduled FRAM.
The USN decided around 59-60 to keep the St. Paul (CA 73) in commission and decommission the Des Moines (CA 134).
Ive never quite understood that.
Anybody out there have any info on the decision.
Thanks. Rick
Rick,
Perhaps maybe for the same reason the KittyHawk being our oldest carrier in service is based at Yokosuka. Perhaps they wanted to keep the Des Moines
here because being the newer cruiser and the auto 8"s perhaps they didnt want anybody getting to close to look her over real good. Why not let them look at an older less powerful cruiser while we keep the new one available for deployment elsewhere if needed. (Even know it didnt happen.). We could also speculate that the reason we didnt let Des Moines go was Japan was a very big fan of heavy cruisers and therefore maybe really interested to take a much closer look at a new one.
You will note that Washington is supposed to replace the KittyHawk. And she is the sixth (I believe) of the Nimitz class carriers. Perhaps since she is older then the other five big carriers that is what her fate is resigned to. Let them look at an older carrier while the newer larger ones stay either at sea or here any place but beneath some other military's "eyes".
The Des Moines and Salem were basically East coast ships where as the St. Paul was homeported in Long Beach at the time. Yokosuka was used to having all types of cruisers in. I have a picture from 1955 with the USS Helena, USS Bremerton, USS Los Angeles and the USS Rochester in. The Rochester with it's single funnel could easily be mis-identified as being in the same class as the Des Moines.
By 1959-60 at least 3 West coast CA's (Helena, Toledo and Los Angeles) had been fitted with the Regulus rocket and I believe all had served as flagship at one time so I'm surprised that one of them wasn't assigned to Yokosuka for a couple of years prior to their decommissioning.
I will say this..For the very brief time we were aboard her she was in very good condition interior wise. Not that being her age didnt have her faults but when the Navy lays a ship up for that amount of time they appear to be super thorough atleast to the interior spaces. Being she was laid up about "61" walking inside her interior spaces some 45 years later shows just how good of a job they do.
Hey come to think of it I walked through the last of a dead breed. That is not being museumed but a mothballed hull in storage.
Alot of people dont realize her sister ship Newport News (CA148) played a roll in blockading during the Cuban Missle Crisis.
There are some great shots of her being pulled from the basin as well.:)
Another interesting area of these ships was the aft lower aircraft hangar where her seaplane was to be held. Many people dont know these ships were designed to carry her sea plane below decks instead of on the fantail or catapult as in other cruiser designs. This is the aft section of Des Moines (CA134). Note the original 3" on both sides of the stern in the gun tubs and her aircraft crane disassembled on the aft deck.
Another interesting area of these ships was the aft lower aircraft hangar where her seaplane was to be held. Many people dont know these ships were designed to carry her sea plane below decks instead of on the fantail or catapult as in other cruiser designs. This is the aft section of Des Moines (CA134). Note the original 3" on both sides of the stern in the gun tubs and her aircraft crane disassembled on the aft deck.
The Baltimore Class CA's also had the seaplanes and hangar. Around 1949-50 they were converted for helicopters. They still kept the crane(s) on the fantail.
The Baltimore Class CA's also had the seaplanes and hangar. Around 1949-50 they were converted for helicopters. They still kept the crane(s) on the fantail.
I can remember reading somewhere that Des Moines class didnt have elevators and used the crane to bring the aircraft out and return it via crane to the hangar when finished. Does this sound correct to you? and did the Baltimore class have elevators?
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
Dreadnought: In your picture, the weather is obviously very wet. But what interests me is it appears that somebody is growing parsley in the seams of the deck planks.
Dreadnought: In your picture, the weather is obviously very wet. But what interests me is it appears that somebody is growing parsley in the seams of the deck planks.
When's the harvest?
Just goes to show you "parsley" can grow just about anywhere eh?
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
Comment