Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Agreement reached on Darfur peacekeepers By LES NEUHAUS, Associated Press Writer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Agreement reached on Darfur peacekeepers By LES NEUHAUS, Associated Press Writer

    Agreement reached on Darfur peacekeepers By LES NEUHAUS, Associated Press Writer
    34 minutes ago

    ADDIS ABABA, Ethiopia - Sudan reversed its long-standing opposition to allowing U.N. peacekeepers within its borders, agreeing in principle to a plan that will permit an international force to bolster African troops in Darfur, one of the world's bloodiest conflict zones.

    Sudanese diplomats, meeting with African, Arab, European and U.N. leaders, said Thursday they needed to consult with their superiors in Khartoum before their government could give its unreserved approval to a revised peacekeeping plan.

    The force could be as large as 27,000, including the existing 7,000-member AU peacekeeping force in Darfur. U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said the additional personnel could include as many as 17,000 soldiers and 3,000 police officers.

    The leaders did not lay out a timetable for the force to start work partly because Sudan had some reservations, including the question of who would be in charge. But Annan said the expansion of the existing force would take place in three phases.

    Sudan is expected to present its final views at an AU meeting in the Republic of Congo on Nov. 24, Annan said.

    The U.N. Security Council voted in August to replace the AU's 7,000 troops, an underpowered force, with 20,000 U.N. peacekeepers. But Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir refused to allow their deployment, saying they would be "neocolonialists."

    The senior British government representative at the meeting, International Development Secretary Hilary Benn, appealed to the Sudanese government to "accept the clear view of all the others present."

    Benn called the joint U.N.-AU focus on Sudan "the best opportunity we have to bring this crisis to an end. In the mean time, we need an effective cease-fire, with all the parties committing to stop the fighting."

    Annan, who would like to stop the bloodshed in Darfur before he leaves office on Jan. 1., said the U.N. and African Union should meet with the Sudanese government in the coming weeks to "resolve outstanding issues by the end of the year."

    The agreement was announced at a meeting in Ethiopia that brought together senior officials from the AU, the Arab League, the European Union, Sudan, the United States, China, Russia, Egypt, France and a half-dozen African countries.

    "The United States welcomes the successful outcome of this historic meeting," Andrew Natsios, the U.S. special envoy to Sudan, said in a statement.

    An African Union Peace and Security Council meeting will be held in the Republic of Congo on Nov. 24 during which Sudan is expected to present its final views, Annan said.

    In recent days, pro-government militia forces known as janjaweed have stepped up attacks on villages in Darfur, killing dozens of people, international observers said Wednesday. In one raid, janjaweed militiamen — backed by government troops — forced children into a thatched hut, then set it ablaze, killing parents who tried to rescue the children, rebels said.

    After years of low-level clashes over water and land in the vast, arid Darfur region, rebels from ethnic African tribes took up arms against Sudan's Arab-dominated central government in 2003. Khartoum is accused of unleashing the janjaweed. The militiamen are accused of many of the atrocities in a conflict that has killed some 200,000 people and chased 2.5 million from their homes.

    The conflict has destabilized a wide region that includes parts of neighboring Chad and the Central African Republic. The chaos has been exploited by rebels from Sudan, Chad and the Central African Republic, and ethnic violence mirroring attacks in Darfur has been seen in Chad in recent weeks.

    The Sudanese army has denied any connection to janjaweed attacks, saying the claims were politically motivated.

    The U.N. humanitarian chief, who was visiting Darfur, said the withdrawal of non-governmental organizations from some areas had left people displaced by the conflict with fewer services and more exposure to violence.

    "This is my fourth visit to Darfur, and I have never before seen such a bad security situation," Jan Egeland said from El Geneina, capital of West Darfur. "There are too many armed elements in and around the camps threatening the inhabitants and preventing us from going in."

    "Aid workers in West Darfur cannot move on the roads because they are being attacked and their vehicles are being stolen," Egeland said.

    Human Rights Watch has called for a major increase in the Darfur peacekeeping force to stop the growing number of attacks on civilians.

    The New York-based advocacy group said it has documented renewed aerial bombing of civilians both in Darfur and inside neighboring Chad since late October.

    The aid agency Doctors Without Borders, or Medecins Sans Frontieres, also reported that thousands of people have fled their homes and refugee camps in Darfur. The agency said it was increasingly difficult to provide aid to the victims because of the violence.
    To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway

  • #2
    Sudan denies agreeing to hybrid force in Darfur Sat Nov 18, 7:29 AM ET

    KHARTOUM (AFP) - Sudan has denied it has agreed to the deployment of combined United Nations and African Union peacekeeping forces in the troubled Darfur region.

    "We did not agree to the deployment of hybrid United Nations-African Union forces in Darfur, as was declared by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan after the Addis Ababa consultative meeting," Sudanese Foreign Minister Lam Akol told reporters Saturday.

    Akol, who attended Thursday's talks in the Ethiopian capital, said the Sudanese delegation agreed only on UN technical units to back up the AU forces in Darfur.

    "We agreed that the AU forces carry on with their mission and receive support from UN technical units," Akol said. "We also rejected a proposal for a combined AU-UN command, as well as the proposed number of troops."

    He said Khartoum still has reservations about the figure of 17,300 troops proposed by the United Nations, and added that talk about troop numbers in Darfur was premature.

    "We think it appropriate to leave it to Sudanese, UN and AU military experts to determine the number of the troops required," he said.

    Akol said he considered the outcome of the Addis Ababa meeting on Darfur was that UN Security Council Resolution 1706 "has been overtaken, and the search for an alternative that will be acceptable to all parties is under way".

    The resolution, adopted on August 31, called for the deployment of 20,000 UN peacekeepers in Darfur -- an option repeatedly rejected by Khartoum.

    Annan's announcement on Thursday took many people by surprise because of Sudan's vehement rejections of any UN role and its insistence that only the current AU force can operate in Darfur.

    Diplomats and observers who attended the talks that led to the apparent compromise said Khartoum's stance was not entirely clear, as Sudanese officials repeated that no UN peacekeepers would be allowed on the ground.

    The war in Darfur erupted in February 2003 when rebels from minority tribes took up arms to demand an equal share of national resources, prompting a heavy-handed crackdown from government forces and a proxy militia called the Janjaweed.

    At least 200,000 people have since died from the combined effects of fighting, famine and disease, according to the United Nations. Some sources say the toll is much higher.
    To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway

    Comment

    Working...
    X