Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 1234567891011 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 185

Thread: Evolution: Violates law of thermodynamics

  1. #16
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    26 Aug 03
    Posts
    3,169
    Quote Originally Posted by M21Sniper
    The Earth is part of the universe, which is a closed system, so the earth is also a part of a closed system.
    If the Earth was a closed system, there would be no energy or matter leaving it or hitting it. This obviously is not the case. The Earth is indeed an open system, a system open to the rest of the Universe.

  2. #17
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    The Earth is merely a very, very, very, very, very, very small part of a CLOSED system, end of story. The Earth is merely a subsystem of a much larger mechanism.
    Last edited by Bill; 07 Jan 06, at 01:20.

  3. #18
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    26 Aug 03
    Posts
    3,169
    Quote Originally Posted by M21Sniper
    The Earth is merely a very, very, very, very, very, very small part of a CLOSED system, end of story. The Earth is merely a subsystem of a much larger mechanism.
    Whats your point? It doesn't change the fact that the Earth is not a closed system, it is affected by things outside of the Earth.

  4. #19
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    26 Aug 03
    Posts
    3,169
    Quote Originally Posted by astralis
    in that case, there is never a true open system.

    seeing as how we can define a closed system to be "one in which the number of particles as well as the total energy are fixed by boundary conditions", how would one explain that the universe has expanded and continues to expand since the big bang?

    thus, hole in the argument.
    The Universe is not expanding, only the Galaxies within the Universe are spreading apart from one another.

  5. #20
    Administrator
    Lei Feng Protege
    Defense Professional
    Join Date
    23 Aug 05
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    9,165
    The Universe is not expanding, only the Galaxies within the Universe are spreading apart from one another.
    so...what was the action of the big bang?

    and here you go.

    http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...on_020320.html

  6. #21
    Dirty Kiwi Parihaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Nov 04
    Posts
    16,019
    Quote Originally Posted by astralis
    so...what was the action of the big bang?

    and here you go.

    http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...on_020320.html
    Bit of a mind bender the old acceleration thing.... Maybe the 'travel in a straight line far enough and you'll end up where you started' crowd were right. Perhaps we're accelerating towards our start point whilst still travelling in a straight line.

  7. #22
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    26 Aug 03
    Posts
    3,169
    Quote Originally Posted by astralis
    so...what was the action of the big bang?

    and here you go.

    http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...on_020320.html

    That is refering to the distances between the Galaxies. The distances between atoms or molecules are not increasing.

  8. #23
    Lord High Hullabalooster Senior Contributor dalem's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Nov 04
    Location
    Columbia Heights, MN
    Posts
    11,797
    Quote Originally Posted by Praxus
    The Universe is not expanding, only the Galaxies within the Universe are spreading apart from one another.
    You are wrong. Every galaxy is not moving away from every other galaxy within a bounded and fixed enclosure called "the universe". Instead, every galaxy has its own intrinsic velocity vector and the space through which they move, called "the universe", is also expanding.

    The best way I've ever read it explained is roughly as follows:

    1. Take a spherical balloon.

    2. Inflate it just enough so that it has a spherical shape.

    3. Take a black magic marker and randomly dot the surface of the balloon with spots.

    4. Begin inflating the balloon.

    5. Think of the dots as galaxies, the surface of the balloon as a 2-dimensional model of the 3-dimensional space of the universe, and the radial distance "r" between the center of the balloon and the surface as time.

    6. Note that as the balloon inflates, the surface of the balloon expands and the absolute distance between the dots increases. To tune this model further, assume that each black dot is instead a very slow-moving ant that crawls on the surface of the balloon.

    7. As long as the rate of expansion is greater than a certain value, the surface of the balloon, our universe, expands so fast that even two ants crawling towards one another on the surface will always become farther apart.

    8. Also note that the universe has no "beginning" or "end" in terms of physical distance - the surface is continuous, i.e. "infinite".

    So the universe itself is indeed expanding, and everything is indeed moving away from everything else.

    -dale

  9. #24
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    26 Aug 03
    Posts
    3,169
    Quote Originally Posted by dalem
    You are wrong. Every galaxy is not moving away from every other galaxy within a bounded and fixed enclosure called "the universe". Instead, every galaxy has its own intrinsic velocity vector and the space through which they move, called "the universe", is also expanding.

    If the Universe is unbounded, it can not expand, as it would have nowhere to expand. So no, I am not wrong. Specific things within the Universe are moving away from each other, but the Universe in it's totality is not expanding.

    So the universe itself is indeed expanding, and everything is indeed moving away from everything else.
    Atoms/Molecules are not moving apart from each other, in the sense of an expanding Universe, and I would challange you to prove otherwise.
    Last edited by Praxus; 08 Jan 06, at 19:07.

  10. #25
    Lord High Hullabalooster Senior Contributor dalem's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Nov 04
    Location
    Columbia Heights, MN
    Posts
    11,797
    Quote Originally Posted by Praxus
    If the Universe is unbounded, it can not expand, as it would have nowhere to expand. So no, I am not wrong. Specific things within the Universe are moving away from each other, but the Universe in it's totality is not expanding.
    Again, you are wrong. Please go through the model I posted above and note that, although it suffers a bit for being a 3-dimensional model of a 4-dimensional (3 space dimensions and a time dimension) system, in broad scope it matches many of the key cosmological conditions.

    The universe is expanding and there is a mountain of evidence to back that observation up.

    Atoms/Molecules are not moving apart from each other, in the sense of an expanding Universe, and I would challange you to prove otherwise.
    If you are saying that matter itself is not expanding, as in the protons in an Oxygen molecule moving away from each other, and the subatomic particles within the protons moving away from each other, then yes, you are correct. But the space in which the particles move is getting larger.

    Addendum:

    The idea that you are proposing, that the universe is not expanding but that objects within it are merely moving with their own intrinsic velocities, is invalidated by the fact that all galaxies are observed to be all moving away from our vantage point of the Earth. All of them, every single one, everywhere, in every direction we look.

    -dale
    Last edited by dalem; 09 Jan 06, at 05:20.

  11. #26
    Dirty Kiwi Parihaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Nov 04
    Posts
    16,019
    Quote Originally Posted by dalem
    You are wrong. Every galaxy is not moving away from every other galaxy within a bounded and fixed enclosure called "the universe". Instead, every galaxy has its own intrinsic velocity vector and the space through which they move, called "the universe", is also expanding.

    The best way I've ever read it explained is roughly as follows:

    1. Take a spherical balloon.

    2. Inflate it just enough so that it has a spherical shape.

    3. Take a black magic marker and randomly dot the surface of the balloon with spots.

    4. Begin inflating the balloon.

    5. Think of the dots as galaxies, the surface of the balloon as a 2-dimensional model of the 3-dimensional space of the universe, and the radial distance "r" between the center of the balloon and the surface as time.

    6. Note that as the balloon inflates, the surface of the balloon expands and the absolute distance between the dots increases. To tune this model further, assume that each black dot is instead a very slow-moving ant that crawls on the surface of the balloon.

    7. As long as the rate of expansion is greater than a certain value, the surface of the balloon, our universe, expands so fast that even two ants crawling towards one another on the surface will always become farther apart.

    8. Also note that the universe has no "beginning" or "end" in terms of physical distance - the surface is continuous, i.e. "infinite".

    So the universe itself is indeed expanding, and everything is indeed moving away from everything else.

    -dale
    Thats a nice description of it, thanks

  12. #27
    Lord High Hullabalooster Senior Contributor dalem's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Nov 04
    Location
    Columbia Heights, MN
    Posts
    11,797
    After re-reading my post myself, I should correct the model above slightly. The rate and nature of the expansion is such that local galaxies can remain clustered and with real velocity vectors that close the distance between each other. The dots/ants should rather be thought of as galactic clusters. I think that is a little less muddy.

    -dale

  13. #28
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Praxus
    Whats your point? It doesn't change the fact that the Earth is not a closed system, it is affected by things outside of the Earth.
    My point is that the earth is not a system, it's a subsystem of a closed system.

    Hell, we don't even really know if the universe is a closed system either. We can't see that far.

  14. #29
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    Quote Originally Posted by dalem
    7. As long as the rate of expansion is greater than a certain value, the surface of the balloon, our universe, expands so fast that even two ants crawling towards one another on the surface will always become farther apart.

    -dale
    Not really true. The milky way is on a collision course with Andromeda.

    Oh, and Praxus, it is a universally accepted tenet that the universe IS expanding(at approx the speed of light).

  15. #30
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    26 Aug 03
    Posts
    3,169
    If you are saying that matter itself is not expanding, as in the protons in an Oxygen molecule moving away from each other, and the subatomic particles within the protons moving away from each other, then yes, you are correct. But the space in which the particles move is getting larger.

    Addendum:

    The idea that you are proposing, that the universe is not expanding but that objects within it are merely moving with their own intrinsic velocities, is invalidated by the fact that all galaxies are observed to be all moving away from our vantage point of the Earth. All of them, every single one, everywhere, in every direction we look.

    -dale
    The only thing that is happening is that certain existents (Galaxies) are spreading apart. That is not the same thing as saying that the Universe - the sum of all that exists - is expanding. Something with no boundries (e.g. the Universe), by definition, can not expand.

    I think this is what people mean when they say the Universe is expanding. My only point, is that it is a misuse of the concept of the Universe.

    If the Universe - the sum of all that exists - were expanding, it would have to expand into something that doesn't exist for it to expand into.
    Last edited by Praxus; 09 Jan 06, at 20:30.

Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 1234567891011 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Fatwa against singing Vande Mataram
    By Vaman in forum International Politics
    Replies: 154
    Last Post: 27 Oct 07,, 21:47
  2. Christians besieged in Pakistan
    By Tronic in forum International Politics
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 07 Jun 07,, 04:51
  3. Bush Moves Toward Martial Law
    By Octoldit in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01 Dec 06,, 19:18
  4. Islamic law: a Divine gift
    By Ray in forum International Politics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06 Aug 05,, 18:53
  5. Godwin's Law
    By ZFBoxcar in forum World Affairs Board Pub
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 27 Aug 04,, 21:59

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •