+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 56

Thread: Stop Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth

  1. #16
    Dirty Kiwi Parihaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Nov 04
    Posts
    15,723
    Country: New Zealand
    :Sighs:
    Why do I get the impression you two aren't the best of friends.
    Wudeness will not be tolerwated, will not be tolerwated I tell you!

  2. #17
    A Self Important Senior Contributor troung's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    6,661
    Country: Kyrgyzstan
    Wudeness will not be tolerwated, will not be tolerwated I tell you!
    I so don't know this guy...

    Zraver beats him up elsewhere...
    To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway

  3. #18
    Senior Contributor Castellano's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Apr 08
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    826
    Country: Spain
    See? you don't get it.

  4. #19
    Senior Contributor Castellano's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Apr 08
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    826
    Country: Spain
    If there is anybody interested and concerned about environmental issues who is reading this, I would advice that person NOT to join Greenpeace.

    Like Amnesty International, they have sold their soul for political reasons. And in my view, as the years go by, they are more and more wrong about a number of issues, like nuclear energy.

  5. #20
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,322
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Castellano View Post
    Look at the case of Ethiopia.

    Remember the famine in the 80s?

    Have a look at the population then, and what is now.
    You should look at birth rate and death rate of each specific region. Just because the absolute number of people increased doesn't mean there's overpopulation. There's something called population momentum. European nations are riding on the tails of this momentum, and if not corrected, Europe will suffer decades of aging population, lack of labor, crushing welfare cost, and eventually, disintegration.

    Europe suffers from lack of replacement population.

    Africa MIGHT suffer from overpopulation. But this overpopulation is not a result of insufficient land but of warfare and corruption.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  6. #21
    Military Professional dave lukins's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jan 07
    Location
    cheshire uk
    Posts
    10,316
    Country: England
    Quote Originally Posted by Parihaka View Post
    :Sighs:
    Why do I get the impression you two aren't the best of friends.
    Wudeness will not be tolerwated, will not be tolerwated I tell you!
    Is that the same as knit one pearl one drop one...some sort of knitting circle jorgon I hear

  7. #22
    A Self Important Senior Contributor troung's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    6,661
    Country: Kyrgyzstan
    See? you don't get it.
    Sorry I'm a traitor who supports modified foods, big trucks and eating polar bears.

    Explain.
    Last edited by troung; 23 Apr 09, at 06:45.
    To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway

  8. #23
    Dirty Kiwi Parihaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Nov 04
    Posts
    15,723
    Country: New Zealand
    Quote Originally Posted by dave lukins View Post
    Is that the same as knit one pearl one drop one...some sort of knitting circle jorgon I hear
    Is a jorgon a baby klingon?

  9. #24
    Senior Contributor Castellano's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Apr 08
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    826
    Country: Spain

    Little time now...

    "I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here.

    It came to me when I tried to classify your species and I realized that you're not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment but you humans do not.

    You move to an area and you multiply and multiply until every natural resource is consumed and the only way you can survive is to spread to another area.

    There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is?

    A virus."

    Agent Smith
    The Matrix

  10. #25
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,322
    Country: United States
    All mammals will multiply until they reach the environment's capacity. Ask the Australians about their rabbit problems. It is foolish to think animals live in harmony with nature.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  11. #26
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    29 Mar 08
    Posts
    999
    And what are your suggestions to get rid of these viruses?

  12. #27
    Senior Contributor Castellano's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Apr 08
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    826
    Country: Spain
    Well, in general yes.

    Still, it's a good quote, specially the virus mentality thing.

    Your previous post deserves a more thorough answer, I'll come back to you as soon as I can. Gotta go now.

  13. #28
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Contrary by Nature.
    zraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Oct 06
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    9,269
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    What's wrong with the conservative approach to these things? Energy conservation and pollution control is a good idea mainly because it saves you money? What's wrong with that approach instead of force feeding everyone the earth is dying pill?
    Dealing with genetically engineered foods is a slightly different issue. Two issues actually

    First, lets say Monsanto creates a strain of rice that has a 300% yield and can't be flooded and only needs 50% of the water in a drought- but cant breed. What use is it to local family farmers who lacking currency cannot buy fresh seed stock every year. These bio-science crops need to be able to propagate so farmers can set aside seed for the next year or you only end up with share croppers in hock to the company store. Plus as more farms use the seed the bigger the supply the less the price the more indebt the farmers are becuase they have to buy more seed every year.

    However creating these crops means we have to know they are safe before we turn them loose. This is the second issue, what if an enzyme in that need breed of rice increased the risk of breast cancer by 15% or 50% We are not sure they are safe.

  14. #29
    Dirty Kiwi Parihaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Nov 04
    Posts
    15,723
    Country: New Zealand
    Quote Originally Posted by Castellano View Post
    "I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here.

    It came to me when I tried to classify your species and I realized that you're not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment but you humans do not.
    Yes, unfortunately agent Smiths script writers don't know shit about mammals. Or marsupials.

  15. #30
    Dirty Kiwi Parihaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Nov 04
    Posts
    15,723
    Country: New Zealand
    genetic engineering is partially an attempt to bypass the often lengthy periods that it takes selective breeding to isolate specific traits but this is a bad thing. The time delays in the selective breeding allow a natural filter to wean out dangerous hybrids without mass promulgation. GE allows no such filters. The main problem however is that with selective breeding seed stock is not copyright-able, with genetic engineering it is as companies can insert specific gene markers to make it identifiable. Thus companies can own the worlds grain output and royalties must be paid simply for the right to grow food.

    Over my dead body.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts