View Poll Results: Do you think AGW is real? Please check the proper one for nationality.

Voters
101. You may not vote on this poll
  • AGW is real-American member

    19 18.81%
  • AGW is real-Non-American member

    24 23.76%
  • AGW is not real-American member

    40 39.60%
  • AGW is not real-Non American member

    18 17.82%
Page 5 of 217 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 3249
Like Tree128Likes

Thread: Global Warming...Fact or Fiction?

  1. #61
    Global Moderator
    Dirty Kiwi
    Parihaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Nov 04
    Location
    Wellington, Te Ika a Maui, Aotearoa
    Posts
    18,178
    Quote Originally Posted by ba1025 View Post
    I remember Kennedy getting shot and grew up when the local river( the naugatuck river) stank and had nothing but worms and bacteria living in it. it has salmon now...cant ever eat them because PCBs don't go away easily but they are living there now. You do know the far right fought the laws that brought that river back to life and used 'science' to base the argument on back then as well ...I haven't been called young in a few years. I am a firm believer in Age and Treachery always getting the better of youth and beauty
    I'm well aware of the effects of pollution on the environment, and have indeed seen at first hand the effects of industry pollutants and mismanagement of environments through overuse.
    What I haven't seen is any actual empirical evidence that anthropogenic CO2 is a forcer of global temperature increase. What I have seen is a single graph by Mann et al in the original IPCC report as proof that there has been an escalation in the background rise (yes background rise) of global temperatures.
    I can go into the reasons for why Mann et al is now regarded as a big pile of smelly poo and has been dropped from the IPCC reports if you like, but the only other thing I've seen from the IPCC are a whole lot of models based on Mann (i.e. using his data as predictor) that have thus far completely failed to predict the temperature fluctuations around the globe. Plus an awful lot of political statements that bear no relation to any of the few scientific papers they've actually presented.
    In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility

    Gottfried Leibniz

  2. #62
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    07 Oct 08
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    5,229
    Quote Originally Posted by 7thsfsniper View Post

    I'm sorry you feel the way you do. But I want to thank you for helping me make my point. You didn't bring anything here that would change my mind. So you have chosen to quit debate and stomp away. It's OK, I apologize for upsetting you.
    :(
    you can lead a horse to water but if you try to make him drink he'll just trample you you didnt upset me. Like i said i wouldn't be upset with a Christian who insisted the world was 5000 years old at some point i would realize the belief was based on faith so beyond the need of proof and their was no point in continuing to press a point he was incapable of acknowledging
    Last edited by Roosveltrepub; 01 May 08, at 17:17.
    Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost.
    ~Ronald Reagan

  3. #63
    Regular
    Join Date
    01 Mar 08
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by ba1025 View Post
    you can lead a horse to water but if you try to make him drink he'll just trample you you didnt upset me. Like i said i wouldn't be upset with a Christian who insisted the world was 5000 years old at some point i would realize the belief was based on faith so beyond the need of proof and their was no point in continuing to press a point he was incapable of acknowledging
    Well it's good for you that I'm not a horse then.

  4. #64
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    07 Oct 08
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    5,229
    Quote Originally Posted by Parihaka View Post
    I'm well aware of the effects of pollution on the environment, and have indeed seen at first hand the effects of industry pollutants and mismanagement of environments through overuse.
    What I haven't seen is any actual empirical evidence that anthropogenic CO2 is a forcer of global temperature increase. What I have seen is a single graph by Mann et al in the original IPCC report as proof that there has been an escalation in the background rise (yes background rise) of global temperatures.
    I can go into the reasons for why Mann et al is now regarded as a big pile of smelly poo and has been dropped from the IPCC reports if you like, but the only other thing I've seen from the IPCC are a whole lot of models based on Mann (i.e. using his data as predictor) that have thus far completely failed to predict the temperature fluctuations around the globe. Plus an awful lot of political statements that bear no relation to any of the few scientific papers they've actually presented.
    i don't think it's a stretch to think greenhouse gases may cause an increased greenhouse effect. Even if you argue the warming is a natural wouldn't we want to mitigate that natural trend to avoid the natural consequences. I have np with man changing his environment. i am not some knee jerker saying don't drill in Anwar...the polar bears are already fuxored whats the big deal. I also linked a .gov site where they reached the conclusion it was from increased CO2
    Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost.
    ~Ronald Reagan

  5. #65
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    07 Oct 08
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    5,229
    Quote Originally Posted by 7thsfsniper View Post
    Well it's good for you that I'm not a horse then.
    OMG IT IS SO HARD NOT TO FOLLOW THIS THOUGHT THROUGH...but who would u all have to disagree with if I got suspended again
    Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost.
    ~Ronald Reagan

  6. #66
    Regular
    Join Date
    01 Mar 08
    Posts
    151
    OK........OK...........OK! I concede! The climate IS CHANGING!


    just not like some of you think

  7. #67
    Regular
    Join Date
    01 Mar 08
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by ba1025 View Post
    OMG IT IS SO HARD NOT TO FOLLOW THIS THOUGHT THROUGH...but who would u all have to disagree with if I got suspended again
    HAHAHAHAHA! So you learned something while sitting in the corner?)

  8. #68
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    07 Oct 08
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    5,229
    Quote Originally Posted by 7thsfsniper View Post
    HAHAHAHAHA! So you learned something while sitting in the corner?)
    in a word No...I made a conditional request to be suspended
    Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost.
    ~Ronald Reagan

  9. #69
    Global Moderator
    Dirty Kiwi
    Parihaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Nov 04
    Location
    Wellington, Te Ika a Maui, Aotearoa
    Posts
    18,178
    Quote Originally Posted by ba1025 View Post
    i don't think it's a stretch to think greenhouse gases may cause an increased greenhouse effect. Even if you argue the warming is a natural wouldn't we want to mitigate that natural trend to avoid the natural consequences. I have np with man changing his environment. i am not some knee jerker saying don't drill in Anwar...the polar bears are already fuxored whats the big deal. I also linked a .gov site where they reached the conclusion it was from increased CO2
    It's a bit of a stretch but it's true stranger things have happened.
    However, as there isn't actually any science that proves it, it's all just theory despite the IPCC press releases and the faith-based internet sites you've linked to.
    You've got to admit, if you substituted the word 'god' for 'global warming' on those internet sites, you'd be sitting around a campfire singing kumbuyah and damning the heretics. 'He's not a man, he's a duck' 'that's true, I saw him floating in the water just the other day'.

    The problem of course is that even though it's not proven, wouldn't it be better to do something, just to be on the safe side. Look after our kids and grandkids? Well yes, but....
    When you f*ck with a system as complex as mans energy dependency you better be damn sure you know what you're doing, and be damn sure you need to do it.
    Ethanol. Great, not more dirty oil.
    More polution. Shhh.
    Higher food prices. No worries, we can afford it.

    Ah, but millions, possibly billions can't and will starve to death, because after all mass production of food is heavily reliant on petrochemicals right through the entire process, irrespective of whether you divert a small part of that food to provide combustible fuel.
    The current food riots over a small price rise from increased ethanol production are nothing compared to the distortions in food prices that will occur when carbon tax gets applied to food production under Kyoto.
    F*ck with the farms at your peril.
    In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility

    Gottfried Leibniz

  10. #70
    Regular
    Join Date
    01 Mar 08
    Posts
    151
    Pari- Good post! Really illustrates the bigger, immediate problem. HERE, HERE!

  11. #71
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    22,736
    May I ask some questions?

    What is the "correct" temperature for the earth?

    Can there be variations? If so, what time frame are we talking about?

    This is just like those liberals who claim the "gap between the rich and the poor" is getting wider. But when I ask what the "correct" gap is, no one could tell me.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  12. #72
    Regular
    Join Date
    01 Mar 08
    Posts
    151
    I have read that a swing of 10 to 15 degrees either way from the current averages would affect food production, ocean currents and weather patterns so drastically that depending on the length of the period, only 10% or less of the population would survive.

  13. #73
    Field mechanik Senior Contributor omon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Nov 06
    Location
    bk
    Posts
    3,588
    i say fvck global warming, pollution is much bigger and real threat. that is something that needs to be addressed yesterday.
    deforestation is hurting ecosystem a lot, i also read somewhere, cutting trees isn,t that bad, not putting new ones is worst, also young trees produce more oxygen, than old ones, size by size
    Last edited by omon; 01 May 08, at 18:18.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin

  14. #74
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Shek's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Feb 05
    Location
    Krblachistan
    Posts
    11,588
    Quote Originally Posted by ba1025 View Post
    That's weather and the BBC is not a govt or a peer reviewed publication
    No, it's the BBC, a secondary source, using a primary source, the World Meterological Organization.

    Quote Originally Posted by ba1025
    That quote is from your source.
    Again from your source.
    Basically saying this is an argument agaisnt Global warming is like saying a few cold winters is an ice age.
    When I use sources, I provide links so that someone can read through it all. The quotes predicting future rising temperatures don't impress me - my question is what did the models predict, and if their predictions are wrong, then why should we put any faith into the model?

    Quote Originally Posted by ba1025
    Image:Instrumental Temperature Record.png - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    I believe this is the answer to your question. It has a number of peaks and troughs but a clear trend
    A clear trend over the past 5 years of no rise in temperature, although it will take 5 more years to see that moving 5 year average.

    Quote Originally Posted by ba1025
    thats a scary one huh?
    So we're less than one degree warmer compared to an unspecified mean time period? That's not scary to me.

    Quote Originally Posted by ba1025
    This is a topic I would gladly argue all day long. it's like being armed with a bazooka in a knife fight
    Until that knife fighter sneaks up from behind

    Quote Originally Posted by ba1025
    I dont see here it's been real 'cold' lately and neither does our conservative govt.
    The US recorded the 63rd warmest March on record. Not too hot here in the US. However, the point you're probably trying to make is about the world average temperature in March, which was the 2nd warmest in the 129 years of collecting data. One month does not a year make, so I'll until next January to see what happens this year.

    Quote Originally Posted by ba1025
    ....El Nina is winding down

    Are you really saying we are not experiencing global warming Shek or are you just saying you can make a counter argument? Leaving cause out of the picture
    Over what time period? My original piece looked at the past decade, but over a longer time period, sure we're seeing warming. However, if models can't predict accurately, then that means we don't have the science to capture the causal mechanisms, which means that we can't develop solutions to weigh on a cost-benefit analysis to enact policies.
    "So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3

  15. #75
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    07 Oct 08
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    5,229
    Well models don't account for weather, el nina is weather
    Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost.
    ~Ronald Reagan

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Strategic Bombing - Fact or Fiction
    By Shek in forum The Staff College
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 31 Mar 11,, 16:54
  2. 'Atlas Shrugged': From Fiction to Fact in 52 Years
    By Shek in forum International Economy
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 27 Apr 09,, 23:09
  3. Robert E. Lee quote - fact or historical fiction?
    By Shek in forum American Civil War
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 28 Oct 08,, 14:49
  4. Global Warming - Kangaroo farts could ease global warming
    By PowerPunch in forum World Affairs Board Pub
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07 Dec 07,, 06:30
  5. Fact about Taj Mahal and the global influence of Vedic culture.
    By mega-drive in forum International Politics
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 28 Aug 06,, 05:14

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •